Barriers for Participation in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: a Qualitative Study

被引:0
作者
Phillipsen, Sofie [1 ]
Weltz, Louise Kongsmark [1 ]
Dressler, Jannie [2 ]
Nielsen, Marie Konge [3 ,4 ]
Rasmussen, Morten [2 ]
Jorgensen, Lars Nannestad [2 ]
Johnsen, Anna Thit [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Fac Hlth Sci, JB Winslovs Vej 19-3, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Hosp, Digest Dis Ctr, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Publ Hlth, User Perspect & Community Based Intervent, Odense, Denmark
[4] Univ Coll Absalon, Dept Nursing, Slagelse, Denmark
[5] Univ Southern Denmark, Inst Psychol, Odense, Denmark
[6] Zealand Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Oncol & Palliat Care, Roskilde, Denmark
[7] Zealand Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Oncol & Palliat Care, Naestved, Denmark
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Screening; Barriers; Qualitative study; NONPARTICIPATION; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1007/s12029-022-00876-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The participation rate in the Danish National Screening Program for Colorectal Cancer is around 60%. Since early detection of cancer through the colorectal cancer screening program (CRCS) reduces mortality rates, it is important to understand why people do not participate. The aim of this study was therefore to examine in depth why some people do not participate in the Danish CRCS program. Methods Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 people who had not participated in the national CRCS program. Data was analyzed using an inductive hermeneutic approach. Results The analysis uncovered three main themes describing barriers to screening: (a) the accountability for ensuring personal health covered the following sub-themes: (i) when invitation is out of sight it is out of mind, (ii) aversion against own stool sample collection, and (iii) the perceived risk of getting colorectal cancer (CRC); (b) attitudes towards the healthcare system and its organization covered the following sub-themes: (i) positivity towards CRCS, (ii) trust in the healthcare system, (iii) lack of internal communication in the healthcare system, and (iv) wish for involvement of the general practitioner (GP); (c) knowledge about disease and screening covered the following sub-themes: (i) knowledge about CRC and CRCS, (ii) wish for information via new channels, and (iii) CRC is rarely something you talk about. Conclusion Among the informants included in this study, lack of participation in the CRCS program was not due to an active opt-out, as most informants had intentions of participating. The informants thought it would motivate them to participate if their GP would remind them of the screening program.
引用
收藏
页码:873 / 881
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sociodemographic predictors of participation in colorectal cancer screening
    Ulrik Deding
    Anna Sharon Henig
    Ann Salling
    Christian Torp-Pedersen
    Henrik Bøggild
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2017, 32 : 1117 - 1124
  • [42] Factors affecting participation in the colorectal cancer screening program: a cross-sectional population study
    Alexandra Romanová
    Michala Lustigová
    Jana Urbanová
    Radan Keil
    Pavlína Krollová
    Jan Šťovíček
    Martin Wasserbauer
    Štěpán Hlava
    Jana Malinovská
    Jiří Drábek
    Jan Brož
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2023, 149 : 11135 - 11143
  • [43] Sociodemographic predictors of participation in colorectal cancer screening
    Deding, Ulrik
    Henig, Anna Sharon
    Salling, Ann
    Torp-Pedersen, Christian
    Boggild, Henrik
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 32 (08) : 1117 - 1124
  • [44] A cross-sectional study on colorectal cancer screening knowledge and barriers among university students
    Hebatalla Abdelmaksoud Abdelmonsef Ahmed
    Bander Saad Albagawi
    Amany Hamed AboZayed
    Ahmed Yousef
    Marzouk M. Marzouk
    Ibrahim Naif Alenezi
    Abeer A. Almowafy
    Hoda Ali Ahmed Shiba
    BMC Public Health, 25 (1)
  • [45] Factors associated with participation in colorectal cancer screening: A population-based study of 7200 individuals
    Huang, Junjie
    Choi, Peter
    Pang, Tiffany W. Y.
    Chen, Xiao
    Wang, Jingxuan
    Ding, Hanyue
    Jin, Yinzi
    Zheng, Zhi-Jie
    Wong, Martin C. S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2021, 30 (02)
  • [46] Overcoming barriers to colorectal cancer screening tests
    Lachter, Jesse
    Leska-Aharoni, Tal
    Warum, Daniel
    Eliakim, Rami
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2008, 10 (8-9): : 621 - 626
  • [47] Recognition and participation of colorectal cancer screening in Turkiye: A systematic review and meta-analysis study
    Gedik, Sevil Aydogan
    Metintas, Selma
    Onsuz, Muhammed Fatih
    NORTHERN CLINICS OF ISTANBUL, 2023, 10 (06) : 819 - 829
  • [48] Polish immigrants’ access to colorectal cancer screening in Norway – a qualitative study
    Sameer Bhargava
    Elżbieta Czapka
    Solveig Hofvind
    Maria Kristiansen
    Esperanza Diaz
    Paula Berstad
    BMC Health Services Research, 22
  • [49] Validity and Reliability of the Instruments to Measure Colorectal Cancer Screening Benefits and Barriers-Turkish Version
    Donmez, Elif
    Nahcivan, Nursen O.
    Rawl, Susan M.
    CANCER NURSING, 2022, 45 (02) : E364 - E373
  • [50] Registered nurses' perspectives on barriers of cervical cancer screening in Swaziland: a qualitative study
    Mkhonta, Siphiwesihle Sibonisiwe
    Shirinde, Joyce
    PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 38