Metaphor, Stance, and Identity: A Corpus-Based Study of CEO Letters in Chinese and American Corporate Social Responsibility Reports

被引:5
作者
Hu, Chunyu [1 ]
Zhang, Aoran [2 ]
Xu, Yilin [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510420, Peoples R China
[2] Ctr Natl Immigrat Adm Beijing Repatriat, Beijing 100071, Peoples R China
关键词
CEO letters; corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports; corpus-based discourse analysis; cross-cultural studies; identity; metaphor; stance; CSR; COMMUNICATION; STATEMENTS; DISCOURSE; ENGLISH;
D O I
10.1109/TPC.2024.3358421
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Background: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports are strategic tools for winning stakeholder support and trust through building and maintaining favorable identities and positive images. Literature review: The metaphorical construction of corporate identity in CSR reports has received little scholarly attention. Research questions: 1. What are the main genre-specific conceptual metaphors used in Chinese and American CEO letters within CSR corporate reports? 2. How do the metaphors build companies' corporate identities? Data and method: We collected 630 Chinese and American CEO letters in CSR reports, identified linguistic metaphors by using the Metaphor Identification Procedure Vrije Universiteit (MIPVU), inferred genre-specific conceptual metaphors, and conducted comparative analysis of metaphor-based stance and identity. Results and conclusions: Although Chinese and American companies share several genre-specific conceptual metaphors, there exists variation in the metaphor scenarios used to produce the stances and evaluations that contribute to favorable corporate identity construction. In the economic dimension, companies from both countries portray themselves as "capable builders," "competent players," and "hard-working gardeners," but only Chinese companies identify themselves as "active architects and travelers following national policy." In the environmental dimension, Chinese companies delineate themselves as "determined environmental protectors" and "faithful friends" of nature, while American companies describe themselves as "environment-conscious travelers"and "responsible stewards" of nature. Both identify themselves as "good corporate citizens" in the social dimension.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 62
页数:16
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   What We Know and Don't Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Glavas, Ante .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2012, 38 (04) :932-968
[2]  
Aiezza MariaCristina., 2015, Studies in Communication Sciences, V15, P68, DOI [10.1016/j.scoms.2015.03.005, DOI 10.1016/J.SCOMS.2015.03.005]
[3]  
Albert S., 1998, IDENTITY ORG BUILDIN, P273
[4]  
ALESSANDRI Sue., 2008, Facets of Corporate Identity, Communication and Reputation, P55
[5]   A Cross-Cultural Examination of Corporate Social Responsibility Marketing Communications in Mexico and the United States: Strategies for Global Brands [J].
Becker-Olsen, Karen L. ;
Taylor, Charles R. ;
Hill, Ronald Paul ;
Yalcinkaya, Goksel .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MARKETING, 2011, 19 (02) :30-44
[6]  
Berman R., 2002, WRIT LANG LIT, V5, P253, DOI DOI 10.1075/WLL.5.2.06BER
[7]   ADVERBIAL STANCE TYPES IN ENGLISH [J].
BIBER, D ;
FINEGAN, E .
DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 1988, 11 (01) :1-34
[8]   The future in reports Prediction, commitment and legitimization in CSR [J].
Bondi, Marina .
PRAGMATICS AND SOCIETY, 2016, 7 (01) :57-81
[9]   Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach [J].
Bucholtz, M ;
Hall, K .
DISCOURSE STUDIES, 2005, 7 (4-5) :585-614
[10]  
Carroll A.B., 2016, Business and Society: Ethics, Sustainability, and StakeholderManagement, V6th