An industry perspective on current QSP trends in drug development

被引:10
作者
Cucurull-Sanchez, Lourdes [1 ]
机构
[1] GlaxoSmithKline, Clin Pharmacol Modelling & Simulat, Stevenage, Herts, England
关键词
Quantitative systems pharmacology; QSP; MIDD; MID3; QUANTITATIVE SYSTEMS PHARMACOLOGY; MODEL; DISCOVERY; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10928-024-09905-y
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
2023 marks the 10th anniversary of Natpara ' s submission to the US FDA, which led to the first recorded regulatory interaction where a decision was supported by Quantitative and Systems Pharmacology (QSP) simulations. It had taken about 5 years for the timid QSP discipline to emerge as an effective Model-Informed Drug Development (MIDD) tool with visible impact in the pharmaceutical industry. Since then, the presence of QSP in the regulatory environment has continued to increase, to the point that the Agency reported 60 QSP submissions in 2020 alone, representing similar to 4% of their annual IND submissions [1]. What sort of industry mindset has enabled QSP to reach this level of success ? How does QSP fit within the MIDD paradigm? Does QSP mean the same to Discovery and to Clinical Development projects? How do 'platforms' compare to 'fit-for-purpose' QSP models in an industrial setting? Can QSP and empirical Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PKPD) modelling be complementary? What level of validation is required to inform drug development decisions? This article reflects on all these questions, in particular addressing those audiences with limited line-of-sight into the drug industry decision-making machinery.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 520
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Evaluating Systems Pharmacology Models Is Different From Evaluating Standard Pharmacokinetic Pharmacodynamic Models
    Agoram, B.
    [J]. CPT-PHARMACOMETRICS & SYSTEMS PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 3 (02):
  • [2] Efficient Generation and Selection of Virtual Populations in Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Models
    Allen, R. J.
    Rieger, T. R.
    Musante, C. J.
    [J]. CPT-PHARMACOMETRICS & SYSTEMS PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 5 (03): : 140 - 146
  • [3] Next-Generation Model-Based Drug Discovery and Development: Quantitative and Systems Pharmacology
    Allerheiligen, S. R. B.
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 88 (01) : 135 - 137
  • [4] American Society for Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, US
  • [5] American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ESMA), ASS CRED COMP MOD VE
  • [6] Towards a comprehensive assessment of QSP models: what would it take?
    Androulakis, Ioannis P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2022, 51 (5) : 521 - 531
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2011, Nat Rev Drug Discov, V10, P889
  • [8] Quantitative systems pharmacology: Landscape analysis of regulatory submissions to the US Food and Drug Administration
    Bai, Jane P. F.
    Earp, Justin C.
    Florian, Jeffry
    Madabushi, Rajanikanth
    Strauss, David G.
    Wang, Yaning
    Zhu, Hao
    [J]. CPT-PHARMACOMETRICS & SYSTEMS PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 10 (12): : 1479 - 1484
  • [9] FDA-Industry Scientific Exchange on assessing quantitative systems pharmacology models in clinical drug development: a meeting report, summary of challenges/gaps, and future perspective
    Bai, Jane P. F.
    Schmidt, Brian J.
    Gadkar, Kapil G.
    Damian, Valeriu
    Earp, Justin C.
    Friedrich, Christina
    van der Graaf, Piet H.
    Madabushi, Rajanikanth
    Musante, Cynthia J.
    Naik, Kunal
    Rogge, Mark
    Zhu, Hao
    [J]. AAPS JOURNAL, 2021, 23 (03)
  • [10] Evaluation framework for systems models
    Braakman, Sietse
    Pathmanathan, Pras
    Moore, Helen
    [J]. CPT-PHARMACOMETRICS & SYSTEMS PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 11 (03): : 264 - 289