Use of tree-based machine learning methods to screen affinitive peptides based on docking data

被引:1
|
作者
Feng, Hua [1 ]
Wang, Fangyu [1 ]
Li, Ning [1 ]
Xu, Qian [1 ]
Zheng, Guanming [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Xuefeng [1 ]
Hu, Man [1 ]
Li, Xuewu [1 ]
Xing, Guangxu [1 ]
Zhang, Gaiping [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Henan Agr Univ, Coll Food Sci & Technol, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Univ Chinese Med, Publ Hlth & Prevent Med Teaching & Res Ctr, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[3] Longhu Modern Immunol Lab, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, Sch Adv Agr Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Yangzhou Univ, Jiangsu Coinnovat Ctr Prevent & Control Important, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
affinity classification; docking data; machine learning; peptides; tree-based algorithms; FEATURE-SELECTION; PROTEIN; BINDING;
D O I
10.1002/minf.202300143
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Screening peptides with good affinity is an important step in peptide-drug discovery. Recent advancement in computer and data science have made machine learning a useful tool in accurately affinitive-peptide screening. In current study, four different tree-based algorithms, including Classification and regression trees (CART), C5.0 decision tree (C50), Bagged CART (BAG) and Random Forest (RF), were employed to explore the relationship between experimental peptide affinities and virtual docking data, and the performance of each model was also compared in parallel. All four algorithms showed better performances on dataset pre-scaled, -centered and -PCA than other pre-processed dataset. After model re-built and hyperparameter optimization, the optimal C50 model (C50O) showed the best performances in terms of Accuracy, Kappa, Sensitivity, Specificity, F1, MCC and AUC when validated on test data and an unknown PEDV datasets evaluation (Accuracy=80.4 %). BAG and RFO (the optimal RF), as two best models during training process, did not performed as expecting during in testing and unknown dataset validations. Furthermore, the high correlation of the predictions of RFO and BAG to C50O implied the high stability and robustness of their prediction. Whereas although the good performance on unknown dataset, the poor performance in test data validation and correlation analysis indicated CARTO could not be used for future data prediction. To accurately evaluate the peptide affinity, the current study firstly gave a tree-model competition on affinitive peptide prediction by using virtual docking data, which would expand the application of machine learning algorithms in studying PepPIs and benefit the development of peptide therapeutics. image
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Embedding covariate adjustments in tree-based automated machine learning for biomedical big data analyses
    Elisabetta Manduchi
    Weixuan Fu
    Joseph D. Romano
    Stefano Ruberto
    Jason H. Moore
    BMC Bioinformatics, 21
  • [32] Embedding covariate adjustments in tree-based automated machine learning for biomedical big data analyses
    Manduchi, Elisabetta
    Fu, Weixuan
    Romano, Joseph D.
    Ruberto, Stefano
    Moore, Jason H.
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [33] Comparison of tree-based methods for prognostic stratification of survival data
    Radespiel-Tröger, M
    Rabenstein, T
    Schneider, HT
    Lausen, B
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 28 (03) : 323 - 341
  • [34] Potential of kernel and tree-based machine-learning models for estimating missing data of rainfall
    Sattari, Mohammad Taghi
    Falsafian, Kambiz
    Irvem, Ahmet
    Shahab, S.
    Qasem, Sultan Noman
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID MECHANICS, 2020, 14 (01) : 1078 - 1094
  • [35] Replica tree-based federated learning using limited data
    Ghilea, Ramona
    Rekik, Islem
    NEURAL NETWORKS, 2025, 186
  • [36] Tree-Based Metric Learning for Distance Computation in Data Mining
    Yan, Ming
    Zhang, Yan
    Wang, Hongzhi
    WEB TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS (APWEB 2015), 2015, 9313 : 377 - 388
  • [37] Tree-Based and Machine Learning Algorithm Analysis for Breast Cancer Classification
    Bhardwaj, Arpit
    Bhardwaj, Harshit
    Sakalle, Aditi
    Uddin, Ziya
    Sakalle, Maneesha
    Ibrahim, Wubshet
    COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 2022
  • [38] Uncovering Sociological Effect Heterogeneity Using Tree-Based Machine Learning
    Brand, Jennie E.
    Xu, Jiahui
    Koch, Bernard
    Geraldo, Pablo
    SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY, VOL 51, ISSUE 2, 2021, 51 (02): : 189 - 223
  • [39] A general tree-based machine learning accelerator with memristive analog CAM
    Pedretti, Giacomo
    Serebryakov, Sergey
    Strachan, John Paul
    Graves, Catherine E.
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (ISCAS 22), 2022, : 220 - 224
  • [40] Determining the Happiness Class of Countries with Tree-Based Algorithms in Machine Learning
    Dogruel, Merve
    Kara, Selin Soner
    ACTA INFOLOGICA, 2023, 7 (02): : 243 - 252