Administrative Processes Efficiency Measurement in Higher Education Institutions: A Scoping Review

被引:3
作者
Alvarez-Sandez, Dulce [1 ]
Velazquez-Victorica, Karla [1 ]
Mungaray-Moctezuma, Alejandro [1 ]
Lopez-Guerrero, Aida [1 ]
机构
[1] Autonomous Univ Baja Calif, Fac Engn, Mexicali 21100, Mexico
关键词
efficiency; quality; higher education; administrative processes; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/educsci13090855
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Universities, like any organization, must attend to the needs of the environment to provide quality services. Among the various aspects related to educational quality, administrative efficiency management has gained interest in recent times. This is due to the need to optimize resources and streamline the daily operations of an educational institution. This scoping review examines how efficiency is being measured in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). Taking as a reference the proposed methodology by Arksey and O'Malley and the PRISMA Scr (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guide, we performed a search of the literature in the Scopus database from 2017 to 2022. As a result, different ways to measure administrative process efficiency were found, such as formulated models, methods, and indicators that show quantitative benefits. A significant finding was Lean or Six Sigma practices to improve administrative efficiency, in addition to the consideration of the interest group opinion through the application of measurement instruments to measure the impact on the user satisfaction level.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Management of Higher Education Institutions and the Evaluation of their Efficiency and Performance [J].
Tommaso Agasisti .
Tertiary Education and Management, 2017, 23 (3) :187-190
[2]  
Alvarado P.L., 2017, Opcion, V33, P471
[3]   Lean Six Sigma journey in a UK higher education institute: a case study [J].
Antony, Jiju ;
Ghadge, Abhijeet ;
Ashby, Stephanie A. ;
Cudney, Elizabeth A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2018, 35 (02) :510-526
[4]  
Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
[5]   Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies [J].
Baas, Jeroen ;
Schotten, Michiel ;
Plume, Andrew ;
Cote, Gregoire ;
Karimi, Reza .
QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES, 2020, 1 (01) :377-386
[6]   Lean university: applying the ECRS method to improve an administrative process [J].
Barsan, Raluca Mihaela ;
Codrea, Felicia-Mihaela .
9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND EDUCATION (MSE 2019): TRENDS IN NEW INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION, 2019, 290
[7]   Employing Industrial Quality Management Systems for Quality Assurance in Outcome-Based Engineering Education: A Review [J].
Bin Rais, Rao Naveed ;
Rashid, Muhammad ;
Zakria, Muaaz ;
Hussain, Sajjad ;
Qadir, Junaid ;
Imran, Muhammad A. .
EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (02) :1-24
[8]  
Briones C.P., 2020, ProSciences, V4, P69
[9]   A QUEST FOR WASTE REDUCTION AT INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING: INVESTIGATING THE INTEGRATION OF SIX SIGMA AND LEAN SIX SIGMA METHODOLOGIES WITH TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT [J].
Brits, H. J. .
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 32 (04) :37-50
[10]  
Chadegani A.A., 2013, Asian Social Science, V9, P18, DOI DOI 10.5539/ASS.V9N5P18