A systematic review of Green AI

被引:102
作者
Verdecchia, Roberto [1 ]
Sallou, June [2 ]
Cruz, Luis
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Florence, Italy
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
artificial intelligence; environmental sustainability; Green AI; systematic literature review; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1002/widm.1507
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
With the ever-growing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI)-based systems, the carbon footprint of AI is no longer negligible. AI researchers and practitioners are therefore urged to hold themselves accountable for the carbon emissions of the AI models they design and use. This led in recent years to the appearance of researches tackling AI environmental sustainability, a field referred to as Green AI. Despite the rapid growth of interest in the topic, a comprehensive overview of Green AI research is to date still missing. To address this gap, in this article, we present a systematic review of the Green AI literature. From the analysis of 98 primary studies, different patterns emerge. The topic experienced a considerable growth from 2020 onward. Most studies consider monitoring AI model footprint, tuning hyperparameters to improve model sustainability, or benchmarking models. A mix of position papers, observational studies, and solution papers are present. Most papers focus on the training phase, are algorithm-agnostic or study neural networks, and use image data. Laboratory experiments are the most common research strategy. Reported Green AI energy savings go up to 115%, with savings over 50% being rather common. Industrial parties are involved in Green AI studies, albeit most target academic readers. Green AI tool provisioning is scarce. As a conclusion, the Green AI research field results to have reached a considerable level of maturity. Therefore, from this review emerges that the time is suitable to adopt other Green AI research strategies, and port the numerous promising academic results to industrial practice.This article is categorized under:Technologies > Machine Learning
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 119 条
[31]   Green AI: Do Deep Learning Frameworks Have Different Costs? [J].
Georgiou, Stefanos ;
Kechagia, Maria ;
Sharma, Tushar ;
Sarro, Federica ;
Zou, Ying .
2022 ACM/IEEE 44TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (ICSE 2022), 2022, :1082-1094
[32]   THE CONSTANT COMPARATIVE METHOD OF QUALITATIVE-ANALYSIS [J].
GLASER, BG .
SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 1965, 12 (04) :436-445
[33]   Performance and Efficiency Evaluation of ASR Inference on the Edge [J].
Gondi, Santosh ;
Pratap, Vineel .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (22)
[34]  
Guldner A., 2021, GI JAHR
[35]   Energy-Harvesting Distributed Machine Learning [J].
Guler, Basak ;
Yener, Aylin .
2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION THEORY (ISIT), 2021, :320-325
[36]  
Gupta A., 2020, SECURE SOCIAL ENV CE, DOI DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2006.06217
[37]  
Gutierrez M., 2022, 2022 INT C ICT SUST
[38]   AI lifecycle models need to be revised An exploratory study in Fintech [J].
Haakman, Mark ;
Cruz, Luis ;
Huijgens, Hennie ;
van Deursen, Arie .
EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2021, 26 (05)
[39]  
Hampau Raluca Maria, 2022, EASE 2022: The International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering 2022, P50, DOI 10.1145/3530019.3530025
[40]  
Hanafy Walid A., 2021, e-Energy '21: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Future Energy Systems, P302, DOI 10.1145/3447555.3465326