Multi-objective integrated optimization study of prefabricated building projects introducing sustainable levels

被引:18
作者
Peng, Junlong [1 ]
Feng, Yue [1 ]
Zhang, Qi [1 ]
Liu, Xiangjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Changsha Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Traff & Transportat Engn, Changsha 410114, Peoples R China
关键词
TRADE-OFF; LIFE-CYCLE; COST; TIME; PERFORMANCE; FRAMEWORK; CARBON;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-29881-6
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
As construction becomes greener, people have higher and higher requirements for engineering project management, which makes it necessary to deeply study the comprehensive optimization of schedule, cost and sustainability level. Adhering to the concept of low carbon and green, the article takes carbon emission factor into the total cost of building construction and improves the traditional cost objective of engineering projects; then quantitatively analyzes the economic, environmental and social impacts of assembled buildings from the perspective of sustainability, and introduces the sustainability objective into the traditional duration-cost problem study, taking the duration of each job in the double code arrow diagram as the independent variable to construct the duration -cost-sustainability level multi-objective optimization model. In order to solve the type effectively, a series of Pareto optimal solutions are obtained using the NSGA-II algorithm, and the efficacy coefficient method is used for program decision making. The results show that the Pareto solution set can provide effective support for the project manager's decision making, and the NSGA-II algorithm is effective in solving the multi-objective optimization model.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [31] Integrating triple bottom line input-output analysis into life cycle sustainability assessment framework: the case for US buildings
    Onat, Nuri Cihat
    Kucukvar, Murat
    Tatari, Omer
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (08) : 1488 - 1505
  • [32] Incorporating quality considerations into project time/cost tradeoff analysis and decision making
    Pollack-Johnson, Bruce
    Liberatore, Matthew J.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2006, 53 (04) : 534 - 542
  • [33] Pour N.S., 2012, WORLD APPL SCI J, V18, P404, DOI DOI 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.18.03.874
  • [34] Rose W., LANDFILL TAX RATE EX
  • [35] Sustainability and sustainable development: A review of principles and definitions
    Ruggerio, Carlos Alberto
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 786
  • [36] A robust scheduling of projects with time, cost, and quality considerations
    Salmasnia, Ali
    Mokhtari, Hadi
    Abadi, Isa Nakhai Kamal
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 60 (5-8) : 631 - 642
  • [37] Research on Supplier Selection of Prefabricated Building Elements from the Perspective of Sustainable Development
    Song, Yinghui
    Wang, Junwu
    Guo, Feng
    Lu, Jiequn
    Liu, Sen
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [38] Tran D.H., 2018, ENG CONSTR ARCHIT MA
  • [39] Life cycle assessment of building demolition waste based on building information modeling
    Wang, Jingjing
    Wei, Jiajia
    Liu, Zhansheng
    Huang, Chun
    Du, Xiuli
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2022, 178
  • [40] Wang Z., 2019, J BUILD STRUCT, V40, P231