Patient Comfort During Postop Period in Breast Cancer Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Opioid and Opioid-Free Anesthesia

被引:3
|
作者
Yuvaraj, Aravindhan Krishnasamy [1 ]
Gayathri, Balasubramaniam [1 ]
Balasubramanian, Natarajan [1 ]
Mirunalini, Gunaseelan [1 ]
机构
[1] SRM Med Coll Hosp & Res Ctr, Anaesthesiol, Chennai, India
关键词
opioid free anesthesia; pain; emotions; quality of recovery; modified radical mastectomy; opioids; RECOVERY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.33871
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Anesthetic management practices have advanced to opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) often replacing opioids in oncologic surgeries. The study was conducted to find the quality of recovery (QoR) of patients undergoing breast cancer surgeries receiving OFA. Methods: A double-blinded, randomized controlled study was conducted with 60 patients randomized to group OFA and group OA (opioid anesthesia). Group OFA received one-time dosing of ketamine 0.3 mg/kg, lignocaine 1.5 mg/kg, and dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg. Group OA received fentanyl 2mcg/kg. Intraoperatively, Group OFA received dexmedetomidine 0.4 mcg/kg/h and the OA group received fentanyl 0.5 mcg/kg/h infusion. Bispectral index (BIS), hemodynamics, muscle relaxant administration, and sevoflurane concentration were noted. A modified QoR-40 score was used to assess the quality of recovery in the postoperative period. Results: A higher QoR-40 score was found in the OA group (median 182, IQR 178-186) compared to the OFA group (median 180, IQR 178-184). Out of the five components, the patient's emotional state was better in the group OA (39.9 +/- 2.77) than in the OFA group (37.9 +/- 2.77). The patient's physical comfort was found to be better in the group OFA (52.52 +/- 3.23) compared to group OA (50.93 +/- 3.23). Physical independence, psychological support, and pain were comparable between the two groups. Patients in group OFA received less sevoflurane, a muscle relaxant, and showed a mild reduction in heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) when compared to group OA. The time taken to reach a Modified Aldrete score of 9 was high in OFA (11.47 +/- 2.16) and (9.17 +/- 1.09) when compared to group OA. No significant differences were noted with the visual analog score (VAS) score, Ramsay sedation score, and modified post-anesthesia discharge scoring system (PADSS) score.Conclusion: We conclude that the quality of recovery of patients receiving opioid-free methods of anesthesia was not inferior to OA in patients undergoing breast cancer surgeries.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of an opioid-free anesthetic on postoperative opioid consumption after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial
    Perez, Josiah Joco
    Strunk, Joseph D.
    Preciado, Octavio M.
    DeFaccio, Rian J.
    Chang, Lily C.
    Mallipeddi, Mohan K.
    Deal, Shanley B.
    Oryhan, Christine L.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [42] Effect of opioid-free anesthesia combined with pectoral nerve block on the quality of recovery in patients after mastectomy: A randomized, controlled trial
    Chen, Jiawei
    He, Lewei
    Shi, Yuying
    Jiao, Jing
    Huang, Shaoqiang
    Zhou, Jianhua
    Luo, Qingyan
    PLOS ONE, 2025, 20 (04):
  • [43] Impact of Opioid-Free Anesthesia on Analgesia and Recovery Following Bariatric Surgery: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies
    Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    Chiu, Chong-Chi
    Hsu, Chih-Wei
    Lin, Chien-Ming
    Liao, Shu-Wei
    Teng, I. -Chia
    Chen, I. -Wen
    Sun, Cheuk-Kwan
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2022, 32 (09) : 3113 - 3124
  • [44] Comparison of the effects of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) and opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) on postoperative analgesia and intraoperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing spine surgery: A prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial
    Rani, Ugrani S.
    Panda, Nidhi B.
    Chauhan, Rajeev
    Mahajan, Shalvi
    Kaloria, Narender
    Tripathi, Manjul
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 18 (02) : 173 - 180
  • [45] TEDOFA Trial Study Protocol: A Prospective Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Opioid-Free versus Opioid Anesthesia on the Quality of Postoperative Recovery and Chronic Pain in Patients Receiving Thoracoscopic Surgery
    Song, Bijia
    Li, Xiuliang
    Yang, Jiguang
    Li, Wenjing
    Wan, Lei
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2024, 17 : 635 - 642
  • [46] Opioid-Free Forefoot Surgery vs Traditional Perioperative Opiate Regimen: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Rooney, Edward M. M.
    Odum, Susan M. M.
    Hamid, Nady
    Irwin, Todd A. A.
    CORE Study Group
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 44 (01) : 21 - 31
  • [47] Opioid-Free Anesthesia Benefit-Risk Balance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Salome, Arthur
    Harkouk, Hakim
    Fletcher, Dominique
    Martinez, Valeria
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (10)
  • [48] The efficacy and safety of opioid-free anesthesia combined with ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block vs. opioid-based anesthesia in thyroid surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Davis, Shane
    Batan, Tom
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2024, 38 (04) : 572 - 572
  • [49] The efficacy and safety of opioid-free anesthesia combined with ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block vs. opioid-based anesthesia in thyroid surgery—a randomized controlled trial
    Zhi Liu
    Congjie Bi
    Xingguo Li
    Ruonan Song
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2023, 37 : 914 - 922
  • [50] Postoperative recovery after breast cancer surgery A randomised controlled trial of opioid-based versus opioid-free anaesthesia with thoracic paravertebral block
    Zhang, Qingfen
    Wu, Yaqing
    An, Haiyan
    Feng, Yi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 40 (08) : 552 - 559