Nanocarriers overcoming biological barriers induced by multidrug resistance of chemotherapeutics in 2D and 3D cancer models

被引:11
作者
Petrikaite, Vilma [1 ,2 ]
D'Avanzo, Nicola [3 ,4 ]
Celia, Christian [1 ]
Fresta, Massimo [5 ]
机构
[1] Lithuanian Univ Hlth Sci, Inst Cardiol, Lab Drug Targets Histopathol, Sukileli u Pr 13, LT-50162 Kaunas, Lithuania
[2] Vilnius Univ, Inst Biotechnol, Life Sci Ctr, Sauletekio Al 7, LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
[3] Univ Chieti Pescara GAnnunzio, Dept Pharm, Via Vestini 31, I-66100 Chieti, Italy
[4] Magna Graecia Univ Catanzaro, Dept Expt & Clin Med, Campus Univ Germaneto,Viale Europa, I-88100 Catanzaro, Italy
[5] Univ Catanzaro Magna Graecia, Dept Hlth Sci, Viale S Venuta Snc, I-88100 Catanzaro, Italy
关键词
Nanocarriers; Nanomedicine; Multi -drug resistance; Biological barriers; 2D; 3D cancer models; TUMOR SPHEROID MODELS; TARGETED CO-DELIVERY; DRUG-RESISTANCE; BREAST-CANCER; STEM-CELLS; IN-VITRO; OXIDE NANOPARTICLES; SELF-RENEWAL; DNA-DAMAGE; DOXORUBICIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.drup.2023.100956
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Multidrug resistance (MDR) is currently a big challenge in cancer therapy and limits its success in several pa-tients. Tumors use the MDR mechanisms to colonize the host and reduce the efficacy of chemotherapeutics that are injected as single agents or combinations. MDR mechanisms are responsible for inactivation of drugs and formbiological barriers in cancer like the drug efflux pumps, aberrant extracellular matrix, hypoxic areas, altered cell death mechanisms, etc. Nanocarriers have some potential to overcome these barriers and improve the effi-cacy of chemotherapeutics. In fact, they are versatile and can deliver natural and synthetic biomolecules, as well as RNAi/DNAi, thus providing a controlled release of drugs and a synergistic effect in tumor tissues. Biocom-patible and safe multifunctional biopolymers, with or without specific targeting molecules, modify the surface and interface properties of nanocarriers. These modifications affect the interaction of nanocarriers with cellular models as well as the selection of suitable models for in vitro experiments. MDR cancer cells, and particularly their 2D and 3D models, in combination with anatomical and physiological structures of tumor tissues, can boost the design and preparation of nanomedicines for anticancer therapy. 2D and 3D cancer cell cultures are suitable models to study the interaction, internalization, and efficacy of nanocarriers, the mechanisms of MDR in cancer cells and tissues, and they are used to tailor a personalized medicine and improve the efficacy of anticancer treatment in patients. The description of molecular mechanisms and physio-pathological pathways of these models further allow the design of nanomedicine that can efficiently overcome biological barriers involved in MDR and test the activity of nanocarriers in 2D and 3D models of MDR cancer cells.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Differences of statin activity in 2D and 3D pancreatic cancer cell cultures
    Paskeviciute, Migle
    Petrikaite, Vilma
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2017, 11 : 3273 - 3280
  • [32] Genotoxicity assessment of eight nitrosamines using 2D and 3D HepaRG cell models
    Ji-Eun Seo
    Joshua Z. Yu
    Hannah Xu
    Xilin Li
    Aisar H. Atrakchi
    Timothy J. McGovern
    Karen L. Davis Bruno
    Nan Mei
    Robert H. Heflich
    Xiaoqing Guo
    Archives of Toxicology, 2023, 97 : 2785 - 2798
  • [33] Accelerating cardiovascular research: recent advances in translational 2D and 3D heart models
    Mohr, Elisa
    Thum, Thomas
    Baer, Christian
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2022, 24 (10) : 1778 - 1791
  • [34] Synergy between Photodynamic Therapy and Dactinomycin Chemotherapy in 2D and 3D Ovarian Cancer Cell Cultures
    Hadi, Layla Mohammad
    Yaghini, Elnaz
    MacRobert, Alexander J.
    Loizidou, Marilena
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2020, 21 (09)
  • [35] Epithelial cancer cells exhibit different electrical properties when cultured in 2D and 3D environments
    Mulhall, Hayley J.
    Hughes, Michael P.
    Kazmi, Batool
    Lewis, Mark P.
    Labeed, Fatima H.
    BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS, 2013, 1830 (11): : 5136 - 5141
  • [36] Genotoxicity assessment of eight nitrosamines using 2D and 3D HepaRG cell models
    Seo, Ji-Eun
    Yu, Joshua Z.
    Xu, Hannah
    Li, Xilin
    Atrakchi, Aisar H.
    McGovern, Timothy J.
    Bruno, Karen L. Davis
    Mei, Nan
    Heflich, Robert H.
    Guo, Xiaoqing
    ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 2023, 97 (10) : 2785 - 2798
  • [37] Using 2D and 3D pluripotent stem cell models to study neurotropic viruses
    Lanoce, Emma
    Dumeng-Rodriguez, Jeriel
    Christian, Kimberly M.
    FRONTIERS IN VIROLOGY, 2022, 2
  • [38] Assessing the Combinatorial Chemo-Photothermal Therapy Mediated by Sulfobetaine Methacrylate-Functionalized Nanoparticles in 2D and 3D In Vitro Cancer Models
    Mo, Ines
    Alves, Catia G.
    de Melo-Diogo, Duarte
    Lima-Sousa, Rita
    Correia, Ilidio J.
    BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 15 (12)
  • [39] Evaluation of Liposomal and Microbubbles Mediated Delivery of Doxorubicin in Two-Dimensional (2D) and Three-Dimensional (3D) Models for Breast Cancer
    Aydin, Melek
    Ozdemir, Ekrem
    Altun, Zekiye
    Kilic, Sevgi
    Aktas, Safiye
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2021, 17 (03) : 274 - 282
  • [40] Comparison Between Polypyridyl and Cyclometalated Ruthenium(II) Complexes: Anticancer Activities Against 2D and 3D Cancer Models
    Huang, Huaiyi
    Zhang, Pingyu
    Chen, Hongmin
    Ji, Liangnian
    Chao, Hui
    CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL, 2015, 21 (02) : 715 - 725