Flexible Facilitation: Coaching and Modelling to Support Inclusive Education

被引:1
作者
Lane, Danielle [1 ]
Semon, Sarah [2 ]
Catania, Nicholas [3 ]
Abu-Alghayth, Khalid M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Western Oregon Univ, Special Educ, Monmouth, OR 97361 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[3] State Coll Florida, Elementary Educ, Bradenton, FL 34207 USA
[4] King Khalid Univ, Special Educ, Abha, Saudi Arabia
来源
QUALITATIVE REPORT | 2023年 / 28卷 / 01期
关键词
inclusion; coaching; modelling; case study; PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; INTERVENTION; DISABILITIES; STUDENTS; CHILDREN; NEEDS;
D O I
10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5601
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The practices of education, such as separate and resource placements, pull-out services, scripted intervention programmes, an emphasis on diagnoses, and behaviorist discipline practices, are not conducive to the goals of inclusive education. This study demonstrates how one instructional coach worked to disrupt traditional special education practices and guide special educators towards the use of more effective research-based instructional strategies and collaborative practices to promote inclusion. Using Robert Stake's intrinsic case study methodology, we explored the perceived roles of coaching and modelling to promote inclusion through the lens of one coach who modelled methods for the special education teachers in multiple general education classrooms. The following themes emerged from the multiphase analysis of data collected throughout the coaching project: coaching as flexible facilitation, coaching as recognition of existing good practice, coaching pedagogical decision-making, coaching instructional reflectivity, and coaching collaborative partnerships. Coaching and modelling for special educators are recommended for promoting inclusive education as they embrace the complexity of changing classroom practice and can enhance collaborative instructional practice.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 91
页数:19
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention - A review of the literature [J].
Al Otaiba, S ;
Fuchs, D .
REMEDIAL AND SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2002, 23 (05) :300-316
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, UNESCO Education
[3]   3. COACHING A SCHOOL BOARD'S TRANSITION INTO INCLUSION [J].
Bennett, Sheila .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS, 2016, 16 :897-898
[4]   CEC Needs Assessment Identifies Preferences in Professional Development [J].
Bullock, Jennifer .
TEACHING EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2018, 50 (06) :396-398
[5]   Key influences on special education teachers' intentions to leave: The effects of administrative support and teacher team efficacy in a mediational model [J].
Conley, Sharon ;
You, Sukkyung .
EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION & LEADERSHIP, 2017, 45 (03) :521-540
[6]  
Eisenberg EB., 2017, Instructional coaching in action: An integrated approach that transforms thinking, practice, and schools
[7]  
Faraclas KL, 2018, INT J SPEC EDUC, V33, P524
[8]   The State of the Special Education Profession Survey Report [J].
Fowler, Susan A. ;
Coleman, Mary Ruth B. ;
Bogdan, William K. .
TEACHING EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2019, 52 (01) :8-29
[9]  
Friend M, 2015, EDUC LEADERSHIP, V73, P16
[10]   What Is Intensive Instruction and Why Is It Important? [J].
Fuchs, Douglas ;
Fuchs, Lynn S. ;
Vaughn, Sharon .
TEACHING EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2014, 46 (04) :13-18