Cross-sectional survey of barriers and opportunities for engaging backyard poultry producers and veterinarians in addressing poultry health

被引:2
作者
Greening, S. S. [1 ,2 ]
Gates, M. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Massey Univ, Sch Vet Sci, Palmerston North, New Zealand
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Vet Med, Dept Pathobiol, Wildlife Futures Program, Kennett Sq, PA 19348 USA
关键词
Backyard poultry; poultry health; veterinary engagement; database systems; cross-sectional survey; COMMERCIAL POULTRY; BIOSECURITY; FLOCKS; FARMERS; WELFARE; TRUST;
D O I
10.1080/00480169.2022.2128461
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Aims To assess the current level of engagement between backyard poultry keepers and veterinarians in New Zealand; to understand the opportunities and barriers for improving access to poultry health care; and to gauge the interest of backyard poultry keepers in participating in a voluntary national poultry health information system. Materials and methods Backyard poultry were defined as any bird species kept for non-commercial purposes. Separate cross-sectional surveys were administered to backyard poultry keepers and veterinarians in New Zealand over 12-week periods starting 22 March 2021 and 03 May 2021 respectively. The veterinarian survey was advertised in the monthly update e-mail from the Veterinary Council of New Zealand, while the survey for backyard poultry keepers was advertised on various online platforms that focus on raising backyard poultry. Results for quantitative variables were reported as basic descriptive statistics, while qualitative free-text responses from open-ended questions were explored using thematic analysis. Results A total of 125 backyard poultry keepers and 35 veterinarians completed the survey. Almost half (56/125; 44.8%) of backyard poultry keepers reported that they had never taken their birds to a veterinarian, with common reasons being difficulty finding a veterinarian, cost of treatment, and perceptions that most visits result in the bird being euthanised. The majority (113/125; 90.4%) of backyard poultry keepers reported that a general internet search was their primary source for poultry health advice. However, it remains unclear if owners were satisfied with the advice found online, as many cited that having access to reliable health information would be an incentive for registering with a poultry health information system. Of the veterinarian responses, 29/35 (82.9%) reported treating an increasing number of poultry in the last 5 years, although many (27/35; 77.1%) suggested they would be hesitant to increase their poultry caseload due to concerns over their lack of knowledge and confidence in poultry medicine; a lack of clinic resources to treat poultry; concerns over the cost-effectiveness of treatments; and a general feeling of helplessness when treating poultry, with most consultations being for end-stage disease and euthanasia. Conclusion The results of this study highlight opportunities for increased engagement between backyard poultry keepers and veterinarians, including making available accurate poultry health information and providing veterinarians with improved training in poultry medicine. The results also support the development of a poultry health information system in New Zealand to further enhance health and welfare in backyard poultry populations.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 26
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cross-sectional survey of owner knowledge and husbandry practices, tack and health issues affecting working horses in Lesotho
    Upjohn, M. M.
    Shipton, K.
    Pfeiffer, D. U.
    Lerotholi, T.
    Attwood, G.
    Verheyen, K. L. P.
    EQUINE VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2012, 44 (03) : 310 - 318
  • [32] Assessment of Need for Recovery and Its Relationship With Work Characteristics and Health in a Sample of Chinese Doctors: A Cross-Sectional Survey
    Sun, Tao
    Shi, Yu
    Yin, Dong
    Zhang, Shu'e
    Wang, Xiaohe
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [33] Knowledge, views and expectations for cancer polygenic risk testing in clinical practice: A cross-sectional survey of health professionals
    Smit, Amelia K.
    Sharman, Ashleigh R.
    Espinoza, David
    Wallingford, Courtney
    Young, Mary-Anne
    Dunlop, Kate
    Tiller, Jane
    Newson, Ainsley J.
    Meiser, Bettina
    Cust, Anne E.
    Yanes, Tatiane
    CLINICAL GENETICS, 2021, 100 (04) : 430 - 439
  • [34] The prevalence and related factors for low health literacy in Xingtai A cross-sectional survey in prefecture-level city
    Wang, Changhong
    Gu, Guoxiao
    Yang, Qiuxia
    Yu, Shuli
    Liu, Huihui
    Yang, Ziwen
    Yang, Hui
    Qiao, Yu
    Yu, Lijing
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (10) : E24848
  • [35] Association Between Suboptimal Health Status and Health-Related Productivity Loss in Primary Healthcare Workers in China: a Cross-Sectional Survey
    Lu, Liang
    Chen, Yongfa
    RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY, 2024, 17 : 1349 - 1359
  • [36] Occupational safety and health in China: junior college students' knowledge from a large cross-sectional survey in Jiangsu Province
    Xu Shuqing
    Wang Lei
    Wang Boshen
    Guo Haoran
    Han Lei
    Xu Surong
    Chen Hong
    Zhu Baoli
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY, 2020, 41 (03) : 375 - 385
  • [37] The Use of Mobile Health Care Among Medical Professionals in the Sichuan-Chongqing Region: Cross-Sectional Survey Study
    Tang, Yan
    Yang, Juan
    Wang, Ni
    Wang, Xin
    Hu, Wenli
    JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2024, 11
  • [38] Health information, what do people search and where? a cross-sectional online survey study in the adult Swiss population
    Diaz Hernandez, Laura
    Fischer, Roland
    Zeller, Andreas
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (10):
  • [39] Engagement With and Use of Health Information on Social Media Among US Latino Individuals: National Cross-Sectional Survey Study
    Rivera, Yonaira M.
    Corpuz, Kathryna
    Karver, Tahilin Sanchez
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2025, 27
  • [40] Integrating Placebo Effects in General Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey to Investigate Perspectives From Health Care Professionals in the Netherlands
    Smits, Rosanne M.
    Veldhuijzen, Dieuwke S.
    van Middendorp, Henriet
    van der Heijden, Marianne J. E.
    van Dijk, Monique
    Evers, Andrea W. M.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 12