Comparison of estimated glomerular filtration rate equations based on serum creatinine-, cystatin C- and creatinine-cystatin C in elderly Chinese patients

被引:2
|
作者
Xia, Fangxiao [1 ,2 ]
Hao, Wenke [1 ]
Liang, Jinxiu [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Zhi [1 ]
Wu, Yanhua [1 ]
Yu, Feng [1 ]
Hu, Wenxue [1 ]
Fang, Xiaowu [1 ]
Liu, Wei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Prov Geriatr Inst, Dept Geriatr Nephrol, Guangzhou 510080, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Sch Clin Med 2, Guangzhou 510515, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Elderly; Glomerular filtration rate; Equation; Serum creatinine; Cystatin C;
D O I
10.1007/s11255-022-03370-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background This study aimed to further evaluate the accuracy of eleven GFR equations in different subgroups of an elderly Chinese hospitalized population. Methods All participants of the study were divided into seven separate groups including age-subgroup, sex-subgroup, GFR Staging-subgroup and whether combined with diabetic, hypertensive, coronary heart disease (CHD) and cerebrovascular disease. Referring to Tc-99m-DTPA dual plasma sample clearance method, six serum creatinine (Cr)-based [Cockcroft-Gault (CG), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPICr), Lund-Malmo Revised (LMR), Berlin Initiative Study (BIS1), Full Age Spectrum (FAS(Cr)) and European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC)], two serum cystatin C(Cys)-based (CKD-EPICys and FAS(Cys)), and three Cr-Cys combination based (CKD-EPICr-Cys, BIS2 and FAS(Cr-Cys)) equations were employed. Bias, interquartile range of the median difference (IQR), P30, and GFR misclassification rate were calculated to compare the performance of the selected equations. Results A total of 359 elderly Chinese patients were enrolled. Overall, median mGFR was 36.91(25.26,56.32)ml/min/1.73 m(2). Smaller biases (ml/min/1.73 m(2)) were shown in CKD-EPICr and BIS1 equations (0.75 and 0.61). IQR (ml/min/1.73m(2)) was least with BIS2 equation and FAS(Cr-Cys) equation (10.34 and 10.65). For accuracy (P30), performance of FAS(Cr-Cys), BIS2, and BIS1 equation was superior (78.3%, 78.0%, and 74.7%, respectively). In terms of RMSE (ml/min/1.73 m(2)), BIS1 and FAS(Cr-Cys) equation performed better (12.44 and 12.51). Conclusions Overall, this study showed that the eGFR equations were less accurate in the diabetic and non-hypertension group than in the non-diabetic and hypertension group, respectively. Among all enrolled equations, the BIS2 and FAS(Cr-Cys) equations might be the best choice to evaluate glomerular filtration rate in Chinese elderly patients.
引用
收藏
页码:943 / 952
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reference glomerular filtration rate levels in Japanese children: using the creatinine and cystatin C based estimated glomerular filtration rate
    Uemura, Osamu
    Nagai, Takuhito
    Ishikura, Kenji
    Ito, Shuichi
    Hataya, Hiroshi
    Gotoh, Yoshimitsu
    Fujita, Naoya
    Akioka, Yuko
    Kaneko, Tetsuji
    Honda, Masataka
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEPHROLOGY, 2015, 19 (04) : 683 - 687
  • [32] Reference glomerular filtration rate levels in Japanese children: using the creatinine and cystatin C based estimated glomerular filtration rate
    Osamu Uemura
    Takuhito Nagai
    Kenji Ishikura
    Shuichi Ito
    Hiroshi Hataya
    Yoshimitsu Gotoh
    Naoya Fujita
    Yuko Akioka
    Tetsuji Kaneko
    Masataka Honda
    Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, 2015, 19 : 683 - 687
  • [33] The Ratio of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Cystatin C and Creatinine Reflecting Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetic Patients
    Khang, Ah Reum
    Lee, Min Jin
    Yi, Dongwon
    Kang, Yang Ho
    DIABETES & METABOLISM JOURNAL, 2023, 47 (03) : 415 - 425
  • [34] Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate from Serum Myo-Inositol, Valine, Creatinine and Cystatin C
    Staemmler, Frank
    Grassi, Marcello
    Meeusen, Jeffrey W.
    Lieske, John C.
    Dasari, Surendra
    Dubourg, Laurence
    Lemoine, Sandrine
    Ehrich, Jochen
    Schiffer, Eric
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (12)
  • [35] ESTIMATION OF GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE FROM SERUM CYSTATIN C AND CREATININE IN PATIENTS WITH THYROID DYSFUNCTION
    Cabarkapa, Velibor
    Mijovic, Romana
    Stosic, Zoran
    Curic, Nikola
    Zeravica, Radmila
    Ilincic, Branislava
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2012, 31 (02) : 88 - 93
  • [36] Creatinine- and cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate slopes for the prediction of kidney outcome: a comparative retrospective study
    Suhyun Kim
    Subin Hwang
    Hye Ryoun Jang
    Insuk Sohn
    Hyeon Seon Ahn
    Hyung-Doo Park
    Wooseong Huh
    Dong-Chan Jin
    Yoon-Goo Kim
    Dae Joong Kim
    Ha Young Oh
    Jung Eun Lee
    BMC Nephrology, 20
  • [37] Prospective Comparison of Equations Based on Creatinine and Cystatin C for the Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation in Chinese Renal Transplant Recipients
    Tang, Z.
    Tao, J.
    Sun, L.
    Han, Z.
    Chen, H.
    Huang, Z.
    Zhou, W.
    Zhao, C.
    Fei, S.
    Que, H.
    Li, Y.
    Tan, R.
    Gu, M.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 50 (01) : 85 - 91
  • [38] Comparative study of cystatin C and serum creatinine in the estimative of glomerular filtration rate in children
    Cordeiro, Vania F.
    Pinheiro, Diana C. S. N.
    Silva, Geraldo B., Jr.
    Lima, Jose Wellington O.
    Mota, Rosa M. S.
    Liborio, Alexandre B.
    Daher, Elizabeth F.
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2008, 391 (1-2) : 48 - 50
  • [39] Revised Equations to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate from Serum Creatinine and Cystatin C in China
    Yang, Min
    Zou, Yonghua
    Lu, Tong
    Nan, Yule
    Niu, Jianying
    Du, Xin
    Gu, Yong
    KIDNEY & BLOOD PRESSURE RESEARCH, 2019, 44 (04) : 553 - 564
  • [40] Factors influencing glomerular filtration rate as estimated using preoperative creatinine and cystatin C levels
    Nishimura, Fumihiro
    Oniki, Kentaro
    Miyamura, Shigeyuki
    Ushijima, Tomoko
    Harada, Hisao
    Taki, Tomofumi
    Yanagi, Shigeki
    Saruwatari, Junji
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 61 (08) : 363 - 370