Experimental validation of Monte Carlo dosimetry for therapeutic beta emitters with radiochromic film in a 3D-printed phantom

被引:14
作者
Van, Benjamin [1 ]
Dewaraja, Yuni K. [1 ]
Niedbala, Jeremy T. [1 ]
Rosebush, Gerrid [1 ]
Kazmierski, Matthew [1 ]
Hubers, David [1 ]
Mikell, Justin K. [2 ,3 ]
Wilderman, Scott J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Med, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Michigan Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Washington Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Nucl Engn & Radiol Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
dosimetry; monte carlo; radiopharmaceutical therapy; ELECTRON-BEAMS; PROTOCOL; DPM; RADIONUCLIDES; CALIBRATION; PHOTON; SPECT; Y-90;
D O I
10.1002/mp.15926
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose Validation of dosimetry software, such as Monte Carlo (MC) radiation transport codes used for patient-specific absorbed dose estimation, is critical prior to their use in clinical decision making. However, direct experimental validation in the clinic is generally not performed for low/medium-energy beta emitters used in radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) due to the challenges of measuring energy deposited by short-range particles. Our objective was to design a practical phantom geometry for radiochromic film (RF)-based absorbed dose measurements of beta-emitting radionuclides and perform experiments to directly validate our in-house developed Dose Planning Method (DPM) MC code dedicated to internal dosimetry. Methods The experimental setup was designed for measuring absorbed dose from beta emitters that have a range sufficiently penetrating to similar to 200 mu m in water as well as to capture any photon contributions to absorbed dose. Assayed Lu-177 and Y-90 liquid sources, 13-450 MBq estimated to deliver 0.5-10 Gy to the sensitive layer of the RF, were injected into the cavity of two 3D-printed half-cylinders that had been sealed with 12.7 mu m or 25.4 mu m thick Kapton Tape. A 3.8 x 6 cm strip of GafChromic EBT3 RF was sandwiched between the two taped half-cylinders. After 2-48 h exposures, films were retrieved and wipe tested for contamination. Absorbed dose to the RF was measured using a commercial triple-channel dosimetry optimization method and a calibration generated via 6 MV photon beam. Profiles were analyzed across the central 1 cm(2) area of the RF for validation. Eleven experiments were completed with Lu-177 and nine with Y-90 both in saline and a bone equivalent solution. Depth dose curves were generated for Lu-177 and Y-90 stacking multiple RF strips between a single filled half-cylinder and an acrylic backing. All experiments were modeled in DPM to generate voxelized MC absorbed dose estimates. We extended our study to benchmark general purpose MC codes MCNP6 and EGSnrc against the experimental results as well. Results A total of 20 experiments showed that both the 3D-printed phantoms and the final absorbed dose values were reproducible. The agreement between the absorbed dose estimates from the RF measurements and DPM was on average -4.0% (range -10.9% to 3.2%) for all single film Lu-177 experiments and was on average -1.0% (range -2.7% to 0.7%) for all single film Y-90 experiments. Absorbed depth dose estimates by DPM agreed with RF on average 1.2% (range -8.0% to 15.2%) across all depths for Lu-177 and on average 4.0% (range -5.0% to 9.3%) across all depths for Y-90. DPM absorbed dose estimates agreed with estimates from EGSnrc and MCNP across the board, within 4.7% and within 3.4% for Lu-177 and Y-90 respectively, for all geometries and across all depths. MC showed that absorbed dose to RF from betas was greater than 92% of the total (betas + other radiations) for Lu-177, indicating measurement of dominant beta contribution with our design. Conclusions The reproducible results with a RF insert in a simple phantom designed for liquid sources demonstrate that this is a reliable setup for experimentally validating dosimetry algorithms used in therapies with beta-emitting unsealed sources. Absorbed doses estimated with the DPM MC code showed close agreement with RF measurement and with results from two general purpose MC codes, thereby validating the use of this algorithms for clinical RPT dosimetry.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 556
页数:17
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams [J].
Almond, PR ;
Biggs, PJ ;
Coursey, BM ;
Hanson, WF ;
Huq, MS ;
Nath, R ;
Rogers, DWO .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (09) :1847-1870
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, DUPONT KAPTON HN POL
[3]   An update on "dose calibrator' settings for nuclides used in nuclear medicine [J].
Bergeron, Denis E. ;
Cessna, Jeffrey T. .
NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 39 (06) :500-504
[4]  
Bolch WE, 1999, J NUCL MED, V40, p11S
[5]   Investigation of Kodak extended dose range (EDR) film for megavoltage photon beam dosimetry [J].
Chetty, IJ ;
Charland, PM .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (20) :3629-3641
[6]   Benchmarking of the Dose Planning Method (DPM) Monte Carlo code using electron beams from a racetrack microtron [J].
Chetty, IJ ;
Moran, JM ;
McShan, DL ;
Fraass, BA ;
Wilderman, SJ ;
Bielajew, AF .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) :1035-1041
[7]   Bone equivalent liquid solution to assess accuracy of transmission measurements in SPECT and PET [J].
deDreuille, O ;
Strijckmans, V ;
Almeida, P ;
Loch, C ;
Bendriem, B .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1997, 44 (03) :1186-1190
[8]  
Detwiler RS., 2021, Compendium of Material Composition Data for Radiation Transport Modeling
[9]  
Dewaraja YK, 2005, J NUCL MED, V46, P840
[10]  
Dewaraja YK., 2022, J NUCL MED, DOI DOI 10.2967/JNUMED.121.263738