Primary care physicians' perceptions of social determinants of health recommendations: a qualitative study

被引:2
作者
Mizumoto, Junki [1 ]
Mitsuyama, Toshichika [1 ]
Eto, Masato [1 ]
Izumiya, Masashi [1 ]
Horita, Shoko [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Int Res Ctr Med Educ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Med Educ Studies, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
love and breakup letter methodology; qualitative research; social determinants of health; primary health care; general practice; DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; HELP-SEEKING; CANCER; DIAGNOSIS; COLONOSCOPY; PEOPLE; DOCTOR; WORRY;
D O I
10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0129
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Several organisations have called for primary care professionals to address social determinants of health (SDoH) in clinical settings. For primary care physicians to fulfill their community health responsibilities, the implications of the SDoH recommendations need to be clarified.Aim: To describe primary care physicians' views about being asked to address SDoH in clinical settings, from both positive and negative perspectives.Design & setting: A qualitative study in Japan. Twenty -one physicians were purposively recruited.Method: 'Love and breakup letter' methodology was used to collect qualitative data that contained both positive and negative feelings. Participants wrote love and breakup letters about being asked to address SDoH in a clinical setting, then undertook an in -depth online interview. Data were analysed via thematic analysis using the framework approach.Results: The following themes were identified: (i) primary care physicians take pride in being expected to address SDoH; (ii) primary care physicians rely on the recommendations as a partner, even in difficult situations; (iii) primary care physicians consider the recommendations to be bothersome, with unreasonable demands and challenges, especially when supportive surroundings are lacking; and (iv) primary care physicians reconstruct the recommendations on the basis of their experience.Conclusion: Primary care physicians felt both sympathy and antipathy towards recommendations asking them to address SDoH in their clinical practice. The recommendations were not followed literally, instead contributing to physicians' clinical mindlines. Professional organisations that plan to develop and publish recommendations about SDoH should consider how their recommendations might be perceived by their target audience.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), 2021, CANC IN AUSTR
[2]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), Pathology, imaging and other diagnostic services
[3]  
Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), Quarterly private health insurance statistics
[4]   Decision making and referral from primary care for possible lung and colorectal cancer: a qualitative study of patients' experiences [J].
Banks, Jon ;
Walter, Fiona M. ;
Hall, Nicola ;
Mills, Katie ;
Hamilton, William ;
Turner, Katrina M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2014, 64 (629) :E775-E782
[5]   Preferences for cancer investigation: a vignette-based study of primary-care attendees [J].
Banks, Jonathan ;
Hollinghurst, Sandra ;
Bigwood, Lin ;
Peters, Tim J. ;
Walter, Fiona M. ;
Hamilton, Willie .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2014, 15 (02) :232-240
[6]   Responding to symptoms suggestive of lung cancer: a qualitative interview study [J].
Birt, Linda ;
Hall, Nicky ;
Emery, Jon ;
Banks, Jon ;
Mills, Katie ;
Johnson, Margaret ;
Hamilton, Willie ;
Walter, Fiona M. .
BMJ OPEN RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2013, 1 (01)
[7]   How does safety netting for lung cancer symptoms help patients to reconsult appropriately? A qualitative study [J].
Black, Georgia B. ;
van Os, Sandra ;
Renzi, Cristina ;
Walter, Fiona ;
Hamilton, Willie ;
Whitaker, Katriina L. .
BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2022, 23 (01)
[8]   Reducing overuse in healthcare: advancing Choosing Wisely [J].
Born, Karen ;
Kool, Tijn ;
Levinson, Wendy .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 367
[9]  
Braun V., 2006, Qual Res Psychol, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1037/13620-004, DOI 10.1037/13620-004]
[10]   Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force [J].
Bridges, John F. P. ;
Hauber, A. Brett ;
Marshall, Deborah ;
Lloyd, Andrew ;
Prosser, Lisa A. ;
Regier, Dean A. ;
Johnson, F. Reed ;
Mauskopf, Josephine .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) :403-413