Complexity science: A framework for psychotherapy integration

被引:11
作者
Schiepek, Gunter [1 ]
Pincus, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Paracelsus Med Univ Salzburg, Inst Synerget & Psychotherapy Res, Salzburg, Austria
[2] Chapman Univ, Crean Coll Hlth & Behav Sci, Dept Psychol, Orange, CA USA
关键词
case formulation; complexity science; personalised psychotherapy; psychotherapy feedback; psychotherapy integration; SUDDEN GAINS; MODEL; DYNAMICS; PATTERNS; PATIENT; SYSTEMS; STIMULATION; COMMON;
D O I
10.1002/capr.12641
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The paradigm of complexity science provides a new way to address the problem of psychotherapy integration and allows us to bypass the various shortcomings of the linear-interventionist perspective. Nine criteria are outlined, which should be satisfied by any integrative approach to psychotherapy: (a) the use of complexity science to provide a meta-theoretical and generic understanding of change processes (from neuronal to social system levels); (b) a comprehensive and formalised modelling of change processes and personality development; (c) an integrative method of case formulation; (d) the ability to understand a variety of techniques in terms of basic change principles; (e) criteria to guide microdecisions; (f) the application of data-driven feedback and real-time monitoring of change dynamics; (g) standardised assessment of outcomes in naturalistic settings; (h) guidelines for training; and (i) strategies that are well-suited to science-practice integration. Using these criteria as a framework for evaluation, one may grasp the potential of complexity science to drive innovation in the pursuit of psychotherapy integration.
引用
收藏
页码:941 / 955
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   How the Science of Memory Reconsolidation Advances the Effectiveness and Unification of Psychotherapy [J].
Ecker, Bruce ;
Bridges, Sara K. .
CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK JOURNAL, 2020, 48 (03) :287-300
[42]   Training Issues in Psychotherapy Integration: A Commentary [J].
Castonguay, Louis G. .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY INTEGRATION, 2005, 15 (04) :384-391
[43]   Psychotherapy Integration: A main Obstacle and Challenge [J].
Caro, Isabel .
TERAPIA PSICOLOGICA, 2018, 36 (03) :177-180
[44]   Levels of Meaning and the Need for Psychotherapy Integration [J].
Wakefield, Jerome C. ;
Baer, Judith C. ;
Conrad, Jordan A. .
CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK JOURNAL, 2020, 48 (03) :236-256
[45]   Psychotherapy Integration via Theoretical Unification [J].
Tryon, Warren W. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2016, 7 :1-26
[46]   Psychotherapy integration: An assimilative, psychodynamic approach [J].
Stricker, G ;
Gold, JR .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 1996, 3 (01) :47-58
[47]   An overview of directions in psychotherapy integration research [J].
Glass, CR ;
Arnkoff, DB ;
Rodriguez, BF .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY INTEGRATION, 1998, 8 (04) :187-209
[48]   HiTOP and Psychotherapy Integration: Promising Potential [J].
Eubanks, Catherine F. ;
Hunter, Elaine Budreck .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY INTEGRATION, 2020, 30 (04) :498-505
[49]   Levels of Meaning and the Need for Psychotherapy Integration [J].
Jerome C. Wakefield ;
Judith C. Baer ;
Jordan A. Conrad .
Clinical Social Work Journal, 2020, 48 :236-256
[50]   Experiential Dynamic Psychotherapy and Cognitive Psychotherapy: Comparative analysis and integration hypothesis [J].
Alberti, Giorgio G. .
RESEARCH IN PSYCHOTHERAPY-PSYCHOPATHOLOGY PROCESS AND OUTCOME, 2007, 10 (02) :121-175