Inequality in Fossil Fuel Power Plants in China: A Perspective of Efficiency and Abatement Cost

被引:1
作者
Choi, Yongrok [1 ]
Ma, Yunning [1 ]
Zhao, Yu [2 ]
Lee, Hyoungsuk [3 ]
机构
[1] Inha Univ, Program Ind Secur Governance, Incheon 22212, South Korea
[2] Shandong Univ, Inst Blue & Green Dev, Jinan 264209, Peoples R China
[3] Korea Univ, Grad Sch Energy & Environm, KU KIST Green Sch, Energy Environm Policy & Technol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
CO2; emissions; meta-frontier stochastic frontier analysis; shadow price; China's fossil fuel power plants; METAFRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION; CARBON EMISSION PERFORMANCE; DISTANCE FUNCTION; SHADOW PRICE; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; POTENTIAL GAINS; TECHNOLOGY GAP; CO2; EMISSIONS; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.3390/su15054365
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Quantifying the shadow price (SP) of CO2 emissions is the key to achieving China's "double carbon" targets. Considering technology heterogeneity, this study applies stochastic frontier analysis combined with meta-frontier technology to estimate the environmental technical efficiency (ETE) and SP of CO2 emissions for China's fossil fuel power plants from 2005 to 2015. This approach overcomes the lack of statistical inference and consistency of traditional methods and improves the reliability of results. The main results are as follows: (a) the average ETE of China's power plants is 0.9444, indicating that inefficient production accounts for 5.66%. The difference in efficiency between the central and local groups is significant. (b) The national average SP of CO2 is 266.8 US dollars per ton, which is much higher than the carbon price in the emission trading system. This result implies the need to design a carbon trading price mechanism. (c) The distribution of SP shows obvious corporation and geographical characteristics that are closely related to the level of regional economic development. Finally, the findings provide policy implications for the improvement of the efficiency and abatement of costs of power plants and the determination of carbon prices.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies [J].
Battese, GE ;
Rao, DSP ;
O'Donnell, CJ .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2004, 21 (01) :91-103
[2]  
Battese GE., 2002, International Journal of Business and Economics, V1, P87
[3]   Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China's thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model [J].
Bi, Gong-Bing ;
Song, Wen ;
Zhou, P. ;
Liang, Liang .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 66 :537-546
[4]   A Bayesian stochastic frontier analysis of Chinese fossil-fuel electricity generation companies [J].
Chen, Zhongfei ;
Barros, Carlos Pestana ;
Borges, Maria Rosa .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 48 :136-144
[5]   Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: A slacks-based efficiency measure [J].
Choi, Yongrok ;
Zhang, Ning ;
Zhou, P. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2012, 98 :198-208
[6]   Potential impact of (CET) carbon emissions trading on China's power sector: A perspective from different allowance allocation options [J].
Cong, Rong-Gang ;
Wei, Yi-Ming .
ENERGY, 2010, 35 (09) :3921-3931
[7]   Environmental technical efficiency, technology gap and shadow price of coal-fuelled power plants in China: A parametric meta-frontier analysis [J].
Du, Limin ;
Hanley, Aoife ;
Zhang, Ning .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 43 :14-32
[8]   Estimating the environmental efficiency and marginal CO2 abatement cost of coal-fired power plants in China [J].
Du, Limin ;
Mao, Jie .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 85 :347-356
[9]   Sources of inefficient power generation by coal-fired thermal power plants in China: A metafrontier DEA decomposition approach [J].
Eguchi, Shogo ;
Takayabu, Hirotaka ;
Lin, Chen .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 138
[10]   Substitutability among undesirable outputs [J].
Faere, Rolf ;
Grosskopf, Shawna ;
Pasurka, Carl A., Jr. ;
Weber, William L. .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2012, 44 (01) :39-47