Non-pharmaceutical interventions to reduce COVID-19 transmission in the UK: a rapid mapping review and interactive evidence gap map

被引:3
|
作者
Duval, D. [1 ]
Evans, B. [1 ]
Sanders, A. [1 ]
Hill, J. [2 ]
Simbo, A. [3 ]
Kavoi, T. [4 ]
Lyell, I [5 ]
Simmons, Z. [1 ]
Qureshi, M. [2 ]
Pearce-Smith, N. [1 ]
Arevalo, C. R. [1 ]
Beck, C. R. [6 ]
Bindra, R. [2 ]
Oliver, I [7 ]
机构
[1] UK Hlth Secur Agcy UKHSA, Res Evidence & Knowledge Div, London E14 5EA, England
[2] UKHSA, Clin & Publ Hlth Response Div, London E14 5EA, England
[3] UKHSA, Evaluat & Epidemiol Sci Div, Colindale NW9 5EQ, England
[4] UKHSA, Cheshire & Merseyside Hlth Protect Team, Liverpool L3 1DS, England
[5] UKHSA, Greater Manchester Hlth Protect Team, Manchester M1 3BN, England
[6] UKHSA, Evaluat & Epidemiol Sci Div, Salisbury SP4 0JG, England
[7] UKHSA, London E14 5EA, England
关键词
COVID-19; non-pharmaceutical interventions; SARS-COV-2; LOCKDOWN; OUTBREAKS; GUIDANCE; CONDUCT; DEATHS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1093/pubmed/fdae025
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) were crucial in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, although uncertainties about their effectiveness remain. This work aimed to better understand the evidence generated during the pandemic on the effectiveness of NPIs implemented in the UK.Methods We conducted a rapid mapping review (search date: 1 March 2023) to identify primary studies reporting on the effectiveness of NPIs to reduce COVID-19 transmission. Included studies were displayed in an interactive evidence gap map.Results After removal of duplicates, 11 752 records were screened. Of these, 151 were included, including 100 modelling studies but only 2 randomized controlled trials and 10 longitudinal observational studies. Most studies reported on NPIs to identify and isolate those who are or may become infectious, and on NPIs to reduce the number of contacts. There was an evidence gap for hand and respiratory hygiene, ventilation and cleaning.Results After removal of duplicates, 11 752 records were screened. Of these, 151 were included, including 100 modelling studies but only 2 randomized controlled trials and 10 longitudinal observational studies. Most studies reported on NPIs to identify and isolate those who are or may become infectious, and on NPIs to reduce the number of contacts. There was an evidence gap for hand and respiratory hygiene, ventilation and cleaning.Conclusions Our findings show that despite the large number of studies published, there is still a lack of robust evaluations of the NPIs implemented in the UK. There is a need to build evaluation into the design and implementation of public health interventions and policies from the start of any future pandemic or other public health emergency.
引用
收藏
页码:e279 / e293
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Agility and Sustainability: A Qualitative Evaluation of COVID-19 Non-pharmaceutical Interventions in the UK Logistics Sector
    Wei, Hua
    Daniels, Sarah
    Whitfield, Carl A.
    Han, Yang
    Denning, David W.
    Hall, Ian
    Regan, Martyn
    Verma, Arpana
    van Tongeren, Martie
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [22] The methodologies to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: a systematic review
    Nicolas Banholzer
    Adrian Lison
    Dennis Özcelik
    Tanja Stadler
    Stefan Feuerriegel
    Werner Vach
    European Journal of Epidemiology, 2022, 37 : 1003 - 1024
  • [23] Impacts of worldwide individual non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 transmission across waves and space
    Ge, Yong
    Zhang, Wen-Bin
    Liu, Haiyan
    Ruktanonchai, Corrine W.
    Hu, Maogui
    Wu, Xilin
    Song, Yongze
    Ruktanonchai, Nick W.
    Yan, Wei
    Cleary, Eimear
    Feng, Luzhao
    Li, Zhongjie
    Yang, Weizhong
    Liu, Mengxiao
    Tatem, Andrew J.
    Wang, Jin-Feng
    Lai, Shengjie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2022, 106
  • [24] Non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccination during COVID-19 in Canada: Implications for COVID and non-COVID outcomes
    Ammi, Mehdi
    Desson, Zachary W.
    Doumbia, Maeva Z.
    HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [25] Effect of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions on COVID-19 in Rwanda: An Observational Study
    Rwagasore, Edson
    Nsekuye, Olivier
    Rutagengwa, Alfred
    El-Khatib, Ziad
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GLOBAL HEALTH, 2023, 13 (02) : 239 - 247
  • [26] Analysis of non-pharmaceutical interventions impacts on COVID-19 pandemic in Iran
    Saadatmand, Sara
    Salimifard, Khodakaram
    Mohammadi, Reza
    NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2022, 109 (01) : 225 - 238
  • [27] The impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 transmission and its effect on life expectancy in two European regions
    Estadilla, Carlo Delfin S.
    Cicolani, Chiara
    Blasco-Aguado, Ruben
    Saldana, Fernando
    Borri, Alessandro
    Mar, Javier
    Van-Dierdonck, Joseba Bidaurrazaga
    Ibarrondo, Oliver
    Stollenwerk, Nico
    Aguiar, Maira
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [28] Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on the COVID-19 epidemic: A modelling study
    Awaidy, Salah Al
    Mahomed, Ozayr
    SAGE OPEN MEDICINE, 2020, 8
  • [29] Analysis of non-pharmaceutical interventions impacts on COVID-19 pandemic in Iran
    Sara Saadatmand
    Khodakaram Salimifard
    Reza Mohammadi
    Nonlinear Dynamics, 2022, 109 : 225 - 238
  • [30] Commentary: Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe
    Kuhbandner, Christof
    Homburg, Stefan
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 7