Non-pharmaceutical interventions to reduce COVID-19 transmission in the UK: a rapid mapping review and interactive evidence gap map

被引:3
|
作者
Duval, D. [1 ]
Evans, B. [1 ]
Sanders, A. [1 ]
Hill, J. [2 ]
Simbo, A. [3 ]
Kavoi, T. [4 ]
Lyell, I [5 ]
Simmons, Z. [1 ]
Qureshi, M. [2 ]
Pearce-Smith, N. [1 ]
Arevalo, C. R. [1 ]
Beck, C. R. [6 ]
Bindra, R. [2 ]
Oliver, I [7 ]
机构
[1] UK Hlth Secur Agcy UKHSA, Res Evidence & Knowledge Div, London E14 5EA, England
[2] UKHSA, Clin & Publ Hlth Response Div, London E14 5EA, England
[3] UKHSA, Evaluat & Epidemiol Sci Div, Colindale NW9 5EQ, England
[4] UKHSA, Cheshire & Merseyside Hlth Protect Team, Liverpool L3 1DS, England
[5] UKHSA, Greater Manchester Hlth Protect Team, Manchester M1 3BN, England
[6] UKHSA, Evaluat & Epidemiol Sci Div, Salisbury SP4 0JG, England
[7] UKHSA, London E14 5EA, England
关键词
COVID-19; non-pharmaceutical interventions; SARS-COV-2; LOCKDOWN; OUTBREAKS; GUIDANCE; CONDUCT; DEATHS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1093/pubmed/fdae025
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) were crucial in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, although uncertainties about their effectiveness remain. This work aimed to better understand the evidence generated during the pandemic on the effectiveness of NPIs implemented in the UK.Methods We conducted a rapid mapping review (search date: 1 March 2023) to identify primary studies reporting on the effectiveness of NPIs to reduce COVID-19 transmission. Included studies were displayed in an interactive evidence gap map.Results After removal of duplicates, 11 752 records were screened. Of these, 151 were included, including 100 modelling studies but only 2 randomized controlled trials and 10 longitudinal observational studies. Most studies reported on NPIs to identify and isolate those who are or may become infectious, and on NPIs to reduce the number of contacts. There was an evidence gap for hand and respiratory hygiene, ventilation and cleaning.Results After removal of duplicates, 11 752 records were screened. Of these, 151 were included, including 100 modelling studies but only 2 randomized controlled trials and 10 longitudinal observational studies. Most studies reported on NPIs to identify and isolate those who are or may become infectious, and on NPIs to reduce the number of contacts. There was an evidence gap for hand and respiratory hygiene, ventilation and cleaning.Conclusions Our findings show that despite the large number of studies published, there is still a lack of robust evaluations of the NPIs implemented in the UK. There is a need to build evaluation into the design and implementation of public health interventions and policies from the start of any future pandemic or other public health emergency.
引用
收藏
页码:e279 / e293
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 transmission: rapid review of evidence from Italy, the United States, the United Kingdom, and China
    Faherty, Laura J.
    de Lima, Pedro Nascimento
    Lim, Jing Zhi
    Roberts, Derek
    Karr, Sarah
    Lawson, Emily
    Willis, Henry H.
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 12
  • [2] Effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions as implemented in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review
    Ashcroft, T.
    Mcswiggan, E.
    Agyei-Manu, E.
    Nundy, M.
    Atkins, N.
    Kirkwood, J. R.
    Machiri, M. Ben Salem
    Vardhan, V.
    Lee, B.
    Kubat, E.
    Ravishankar, S.
    Krishan, P.
    De Silva, U.
    Iyahen, E. O.
    Rostron, J.
    Zawiejska, A.
    Ogarrio, K.
    Harikar, M.
    Chishty, S.
    Mureyi, D.
    Evans, B.
    Duval, D.
    Carville, S.
    Brini, S.
    Hill, J.
    Qureshi, M.
    Simmons, Z.
    Lyell, I
    Kavoi, T.
    Dozier, M.
    Curry, G.
    Ordonez-Mena, J. M.
    de Lusignan, S.
    Sheikh, A.
    Theodoratou, E.
    Mcquillan, R.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2025,
  • [3] Non-pharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A review
    Perra, Nicola
    PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 2021, 913 : 1 - 52
  • [4] Systematic review of empirical studies comparing the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19
    Mendez-Brito, Alba
    El Bcheraoui, Charbel
    Pozo-Martin, Francisco
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2021, 83 (03) : 281 - 293
  • [5] Pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic
    Molla, Jeta
    Farhang-Sardroodi, Suzan
    Moyles, Iain R.
    Heffernan, Jane M.
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2023, 10 (12):
  • [6] Ranking Effectiveness of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions Against COVID-19: A Review
    Susič D.
    Tomšič J.
    Gams M.
    Informatica (Slovenia), 2022, 46 (04): : 449 - 456
  • [7] The economic reaction to non-pharmaceutical interventions during Covid-19
    Segarra-Blasco, Agusti
    Teruel, Mercedes
    Cattaruzzo, Sebastiano
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2021, 72 : 592 - 608
  • [8] Modeling COVID-19 for Lifting Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions
    Koehler, Matthew
    Slater, David M.
    Jacyna, Garry
    Thompson, James R.
    JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, 2021, 24 (02):
  • [9] The methodologies to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: a systematic review
    Banholzer, Nicolas
    Lison, Adrian
    Ozcelik, Dennis
    Stadler, Tanja
    Feuerriegel, Stefan
    Vach, Werner
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 37 (10) : 1003 - 1024
  • [10] Environmental Indicator for COVID-19 Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions
    Lian, Xinbo
    Huang, Jianping
    Zhang, Li
    Liu, Chuwei
    Liu, Xiaoyue
    Wang, Lina
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 48 (02)