Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services Provided by Different Rural Landscape

被引:3
作者
Bartolini, Fabio [1 ]
Vergamini, Daniele [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ferrara, Dept Chem Pharmaceut & Agr Sci, I-44121 Ferrara, Italy
[2] Univ Pisa, Dept Agr Food & Environm, I-56126 Pisa, Italy
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
rural landscape; ecosystem services; Italy; multi-criteria analysis; fuzzy; AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES; VALUATION; CLASSIFICATION; MONETARY; POLICY; FIELD;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy13040977
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Ecosystems in rural areas play a crucial role in promoting human well-being and economic development by providing essential resources such as food, water, raw materials, and energy. Furthermore, rural ecosystems offer various services, such as recreational opportunities, climate regulation, biodiversity conservation, and environmental mitigation. However, a narrow focus on provisioning services has led to the standardisation of landscapes, decreased levels of biodiversity and reduced ecosystem services in several areas. Moreover, diverse rural landscapes can enrich the provisioning, regulating, cultural, and supporting services. While much research has explored the relationship between land use, landscape, and ecosystem services, there is still a need to better understand the trade-offs and synergies between these factors in providing ecosystem services. To address this gap, we conducted an empirical analysis of the perception of ecosystem services provided by different rural landscapes in the Tuscany region. Specifically, we used the concept of morphotypes, which describes 'invariants' that distinguish six different rural landscape typologies in the region. We surveyed 28 experts to identify rural landscape contributions to 17 ecosystem services. Our results provide empirical evidence and insight into the mechanisms necessary to align the provision of ecosystem services by rural landscapes with current and future needs.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [21] A contribution towards a transfer of the ecosystem service concept to landscape planning using landscape metrics
    Frank, Susanne
    Fuerst, Christine
    Koschke, Lars
    Makeschin, Franz
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 : 30 - 38
  • [22] Fratianni S, 2017, WOR GEOMORPHOL LANDS, P29, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26194-2_4
  • [23] Landscape products for sustainable agricultural landscapes
    Garcia-Martin, Maria
    Huntsinger, Lynn
    Jose Ibarrola-Rivas, Maria
    Penker, Marianne
    D'Ambrosio, Ugo
    Dimopoulos, Thymios
    Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria E.
    Kizos, Thanasis
    Munoz-Rojas, Jose
    Saito, Osamu
    Zimmerer, Karl S.
    Abson, David J.
    Liu, Jianguo
    Quintas-Soriano, Cristina
    Sorensen, Irene Holm
    Verburg, Peter H.
    Plieninger, Tobias
    [J]. NATURE FOOD, 2022, 3 (10): : 814 - 821
  • [24] Agricultural cooperatives contributing to the alleviation of rural poverty. The case of Konjic (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
    Gava, Oriana
    Ardakani, Zahra
    Delalic, Adela
    Azzi, Nour
    Bartolini, Fabio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2021, 82 : 328 - 339
  • [25] Multi-criteria decision making methods to address rural land allocation problems: A systematic review
    Gebre, Sintayehu Legesse
    Cattrysse, Dirk
    Alemayehu, Esayas
    Van Orshoven, Jos
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION RESEARCH, 2021, 9 (04) : 490 - 501
  • [26] Evaluation and simulation of the impact of land use change on ecosystem services trade-offs in ecological restoration areas, China
    He, Juan
    Shi, Xueyi
    Fu, Yangjun
    Yuan, Ye
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 99
  • [27] Hermann A., 2011, Living Reviews in Landscape Research, V5, P1
  • [28] Classification and valuation of soil ecosystem services
    Jonsson, Jon Orvar G.
    Davidsdottir, Brynhildur
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2016, 145 : 24 - 38
  • [29] Mapping and assessment of landscape aesthetic quality in Lithuania
    Kalinauskas, Marius
    Miksa, Katazyna
    Inacio, Miguel
    Gomes, Eduardo
    Pereira, Paulo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 286
  • [30] Agroforestry is paying off - Economic evaluation of ecosystem services in European landscapes with and without agroforestry systems
    Kay, Sonja
    Graves, Anil
    Palma, Joao H. N.
    Moreno, Gerardo
    Roces-Diaz, Jose, V
    Aviron, Stephanie
    Chouvardas, Dimitrios
    Crous-Duran, Josep
    Ferreiro-Dominguez, Nuria
    de Jalon, Silvestre Garcia
    Macicasan, Vlad
    Rosa Mosquera-Losada, Maria
    Pantera, Anastasia
    Javier Santiago-Freijanes, Jose
    Szerencsits, Erich
    Torralba, Mario
    Burgess, Paul J.
    Herzog, Felix
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 36