Capabilities for circular economy innovation: Factors leading to product/ service innovations in the construction and manufacturing industries

被引:7
作者
Saari, Ulla A. [1 ]
Damberg, Svenja [2 ,5 ]
Schneider, Matthias [2 ]
Aarikka-Stenroos, Leena [1 ]
Herstatt, Cornelius [2 ]
Lanz, Minna [3 ]
Ringle, Christian M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ, Ctr Innovat & Technol Res, Ind Engn & Management, Korkeakoulunkatu 8, Tampere 33720, Finland
[2] Hamburg Univ Technol, Inst Technol & Innovat Management, Schwarzenberg Campus 4, D-21073 Hamburg, Germany
[3] Tampere Univ, Automat Technol & Mech Engn, Korkeakoulunkatu 6, Tampere 33720, Finland
[4] Hamburg Univ Technol, Inst Management & Decis Sci, Schwarzenberg Campus 4, D-21073 Hamburg, Germany
[5] Univ Twente, Dept Hightech Business & Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship & Technol Management, Drienerlolaan 5, NL-7522 NB Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Circular economy implementation; Circular economy innovation capability; IT resource orchestration capability; PLS-SEM; Product/service innovations; BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATION; RESOURCE ORCHESTRATION; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; PERFORMANCE; SUSTAINABILITY; MANAGEMENT; PLS; INTEGRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140295
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As companies in the manufacturing and construction industries strive to meet the EU circular economy (CE) targets, they need to develop new capabilities to implement CE activities that can positively influence their product/service innovations. However, companies in both industries, and beyond, still struggle to develop internal capabilities to innovate products and services that would help them in implementing CE principles and move towards the CE. The objective of this research is to analyze the types of innovation capabilities that are needed to enable CE implementation and achieve product/service innovations in two different industrial sectors. Prior research has focused on innovating and implementing circular business models and elaborated less on the innovation capability types. We collected survey data in December 2021-January 2022 that consists of responses from companies operating in Germany (n = 177), including employees in manufacturing (n = 87) and construction companies (n = 90). The results from the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) based on measurement models from the literature indicate that employees in both sectors overall perceive higher levels of CE implementation capability as important for the company's product/service innovations. Furthermore, the results reveal differences in the way CE innovation capability and IT resource orchestration capability influence CE implementation and product/service innovations in the two sectors. Our study offers theoretical implications on how dynamic capabilities are associated with CE innovations and how they influence companies' product/service innovations based on empirical evidence from two industrial sectors. Those capabilities that are crucial for circular product/service innovations need to be associated with CE implementation capabilities. The results further advise practitioners in the development of CE innovation and CE implementation capabilities and how they are linked to IT resource orchestration capability and provide evidence on their relevance to creating product/service innovations.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 129 条
  • [51] Who is in charge? A review and a research agenda on the 'human side' of the circular economy
    Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta
    Sarkis, Joseph
    Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa
    Renwick, Douglas William Scott
    Singh, Sanjay Kumar
    Grebinevych, Oksana
    Kruglianskas, Isak
    Godinho Filho, Moacir
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 222 : 793 - 801
  • [52] When stakeholder pressure drives the circular economy Measuring the mediating role of innovation capabilities
    Jakhar, Suresh Kumar
    Mangla, Sachin Kumar
    Luthra, Sunil
    Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov
    [J]. MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2019, 57 (04) : 904 - 920
  • [53] Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?
    Janssen, Matthijs J.
    Abbasiharofteh, Milad
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 180
  • [54] How to renew business strategy to achieve sustainability and circularity? A process model of strategic development in incumbent technology companies
    Kaipainen, Jenni
    Aarikka-Stenroos, Leena
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (05) : 1947 - 1963
  • [55] The role of dynamic capabilities in circular economy implementation and performance of companies
    Khan, Owais
    Daddi, Tiberio
    Iraldo, Fabio
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 27 (06) : 3018 - 3033
  • [56] Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU)
    Kirchherr, Julian
    Piscicelli, Laura
    Bour, Ruben
    Kostense-Smit, Erica
    Muller, Jennifer
    Huibrechtse-Truijens, Anne
    Hekkert, Marko
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 150 : 264 - 272
  • [57] Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions
    Kirchherr, Julian
    Reike, Denise
    Hekkert, Marko
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 127 : 221 - 232
  • [58] Towards a collaboration framework for circular economy: The role of dynamic capabilities and open innovation
    Kohler, Julia
    Sonnichsen, Sonnich Dahl
    Beske-Jansen, Philip
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (06) : 2700 - 2713
  • [59] SCANNING AND DATA CAPTURING FOR BIM-SUPPORTED RESOURCES ASSESSMENT: A CASE STUDY
    Kovacic, Iva
    Honic, Meliha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 26 : 624 - 638
  • [60] Towards a business analytics capability for the circular economy
    Kristoffersen, Eivind
    Mikalef, Patrick
    Blomsma, Fenna
    Li, Jingyue
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 171