Global use of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in nephrology: a mixed methods study

被引:7
作者
Anderson, Nicola Elizabeth [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kyte, Derek [1 ,4 ]
McMullan, Christel [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Cockwell, Paul [1 ,8 ]
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee [1 ,3 ,7 ,9 ,10 ,11 ]
Verdi, Rav [12 ]
Calvert, Melanie [1 ,3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,9 ,10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Heath Res, Ctr Patient Reported Outcomes Res, Birmingham, England
[2] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Res Dev & Innovat, Birmingham, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, NIHR Appl Res Collaborat, Birmingham, England
[4] Univ Worcester, Sch Allied Hlth & Community, Worcester, England
[5] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR SRMRC, Birmingham, England
[6] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, England
[7] Univ Birmingham, NIHR Blood & Transplant Res Unit BTRU Precis Trans, Birmingham, England
[8] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Renal Med, Birmingham, England
[9] Univ Birmingham, NIHR Birmingham Biomed Res Ctr, Birmingham, England
[10] Univ Birmingham, Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Birmingham, England
[11] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham Hlth Partners Ctr Regulatory Sci & Inno, Birmingham, England
[12] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Ctr Patient Reported Outcomes Res CPROR, Birmingham, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 07期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
telemedicine; dialysis; quality of life; registries; patient reported outcome measures; qualitative research; CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH; HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS; FOLLOW-UP; COLLECTION; CARE; PERSPECTIVES; PERCEPTIONS; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070927
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThe use of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems to support the management of patients with chronic kidney disease is increasing. This mixed-methods study aimed to comprehensively identify existing and developing ePRO systems, used in nephrology settings globally, ascertaining key characteristics and factors for successful implementation. Study designePRO systems and developers were identified through a scoping review of the literature and contact with field experts. Developers were invited to participate in a structured survey, to summarise key system characteristics including: (1) system objectives, (2) population, (3) PRO measures used, (4) level of automation, (5) reporting, (6) integration into workflow and (7) links to electronic health records/national registries. Subsequent semistructured interviews were conducted to explore responses. Setting and participantsEligible systems included those being developed or used in nephrology settings to assess ePROs and summarise results to care providers. System developers included those with a key responsibility for aspects of the design, development or implementation of an eligible system. Analytical approachStructured survey data were summarised using descriptive statistics. Interview transcripts were analysed using Codebook Thematic Analysis using domains from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. ResultsFifteen unique ePRO systems were identified across seven countries; 10 system developers completed the structured survey and 7 participated in semistructured interviews. Despite system heterogeneity, reported features required for effective implementation included early and sustained patient involvement, clinician champions and expanding existing electronic platforms to integrate ePROs. Systems demonstrated several common features, with the majority being implemented within research settings, thereby affecting system implementation readiness for real-world application. ConclusionsThere has been considerable research investment in ePRO systems. The findings of this study outline key system features and factors to support the successful implementation of ePROs in routine kidney care.Cite Now
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 98 条
[31]   Feasibility of Tablet-Based Patient-Reported Symptom Data Collection Among Hemodialysis Patients [J].
Flythe, Jennifer E. ;
Tugman, Matthew J. ;
Narendra, Julia H. ;
Dorough, Adeline ;
Hilbert, Johnathan ;
Assimon, Magdalene M. ;
DeWalt, Darren A. .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL REPORTS, 2020, 5 (07) :1026-1039
[32]   Development and content validity of a hemodialysis symptom patient-reported outcome measure [J].
Flythe, Jennifer E. ;
Dorough, Adeline ;
Narendra, Julia H. ;
Wingard, Rebecca L. ;
Dalrymple, Lorien S. ;
DeWalt, Darren A. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (01) :253-265
[33]   Rapid Electronic Capturing of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Older Adults With End-Stage Renal Disease: A Feasibility Study [J].
Gabbard, Jennifer ;
McLouth, Christopher J. ;
Brenes, Gretchen ;
Claudel, Sophie ;
Ongchuan, Samantha ;
Burkart, John ;
Pajewski, Nicholas ;
Callahan, Kathryn E. ;
Williamson, Jeff D. ;
Murea, Mariana .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 38 (05) :432-440
[34]   Routine provision of feedback from patient-reported outcome measurements to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice [J].
Gibbons, Chris ;
Porter, Ian ;
Goncalves-Bradley, Daniela C. ;
Stoilov, Stanimir ;
Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio ;
Tsangaris, Elena ;
Gangannagaripalli, Jaheeda ;
Davey, Antoinette ;
Gibbons, Elizabeth J. ;
Kotzeva, Anna ;
Evans, Jonathan ;
van der Wees, Philip J. ;
Kontopantelis, Evangelos ;
Greenhalgh, Joanne ;
Bower, Peter ;
Alonso, Jordi ;
Valderas, Jose M. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, (10)
[35]   Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources [J].
Greenhalgh, T ;
Peacock, R .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7524) :1064-1065
[36]   The Symptom Monitoring with Feedback Trial (SWIFT): protocol for a registry-based cluster randomised controlled trial in haemodialysis [J].
Greenham, Lavern ;
Bennett, Paul N. ;
Dansie, Kathryn ;
Viecelli, Andrea K. ;
Jesudason, Shilpanjali ;
Mister, Rebecca ;
Smyth, Brendan ;
Westall, Portia ;
Herzog, Samuel ;
Brown, Chris ;
Handke, William ;
Palmer, Suetonia C. ;
Caskey, Fergus J. ;
Couchoud, Cecile ;
Simes, John ;
McDonald, Stephen P. ;
Morton, Rachael L. .
TRIALS, 2022, 23 (01)
[37]   Leveraging Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Data Visualization [J].
Grossman, Lisa V. ;
Feiner, Steven K. ;
Mitchell, Elliot G. ;
Creber, Ruth M. Masterson .
APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2018, 9 (03) :565-575
[38]  
Grove B, 2018, QUAL LIFE RES, V27, pS143
[39]   Remote follow-up based on patient-reported outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease: A qualitative study of patient perspectives [J].
Grove, Birgith Engelst ;
Schougaard, Liv Marit Valen ;
Ivarsen, Per ;
Hjollund, Niels Henrik ;
de Thurah, Annette ;
Mejdahl, Caroline Trillingsgaard .
PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (02)
[40]   Patient-reported outcome measures for clinical decision-making in outpatient follow-up: validity and reliability of a renal disease questionnaire [J].
Grove, Birgith Engelst ;
Schougaard, Liv Marit Valen ;
Ivarsen, Per Ramlov ;
Kyte, Derek ;
Hjollund, Niels Henrik ;
de Thurah, Annette .
JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2021, 5 (01)