Global use of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in nephrology: a mixed methods study

被引:7
作者
Anderson, Nicola Elizabeth [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kyte, Derek [1 ,4 ]
McMullan, Christel [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Cockwell, Paul [1 ,8 ]
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee [1 ,3 ,7 ,9 ,10 ,11 ]
Verdi, Rav [12 ]
Calvert, Melanie [1 ,3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,9 ,10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Heath Res, Ctr Patient Reported Outcomes Res, Birmingham, England
[2] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Res Dev & Innovat, Birmingham, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, NIHR Appl Res Collaborat, Birmingham, England
[4] Univ Worcester, Sch Allied Hlth & Community, Worcester, England
[5] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR SRMRC, Birmingham, England
[6] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, England
[7] Univ Birmingham, NIHR Blood & Transplant Res Unit BTRU Precis Trans, Birmingham, England
[8] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Renal Med, Birmingham, England
[9] Univ Birmingham, NIHR Birmingham Biomed Res Ctr, Birmingham, England
[10] Univ Birmingham, Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Birmingham, England
[11] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham Hlth Partners Ctr Regulatory Sci & Inno, Birmingham, England
[12] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Ctr Patient Reported Outcomes Res CPROR, Birmingham, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 07期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
telemedicine; dialysis; quality of life; registries; patient reported outcome measures; qualitative research; CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH; HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS; FOLLOW-UP; COLLECTION; CARE; PERSPECTIVES; PERCEPTIONS; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070927
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThe use of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems to support the management of patients with chronic kidney disease is increasing. This mixed-methods study aimed to comprehensively identify existing and developing ePRO systems, used in nephrology settings globally, ascertaining key characteristics and factors for successful implementation. Study designePRO systems and developers were identified through a scoping review of the literature and contact with field experts. Developers were invited to participate in a structured survey, to summarise key system characteristics including: (1) system objectives, (2) population, (3) PRO measures used, (4) level of automation, (5) reporting, (6) integration into workflow and (7) links to electronic health records/national registries. Subsequent semistructured interviews were conducted to explore responses. Setting and participantsEligible systems included those being developed or used in nephrology settings to assess ePROs and summarise results to care providers. System developers included those with a key responsibility for aspects of the design, development or implementation of an eligible system. Analytical approachStructured survey data were summarised using descriptive statistics. Interview transcripts were analysed using Codebook Thematic Analysis using domains from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. ResultsFifteen unique ePRO systems were identified across seven countries; 10 system developers completed the structured survey and 7 participated in semistructured interviews. Despite system heterogeneity, reported features required for effective implementation included early and sustained patient involvement, clinician champions and expanding existing electronic platforms to integrate ePROs. Systems demonstrated several common features, with the majority being implemented within research settings, thereby affecting system implementation readiness for real-world application. ConclusionsThere has been considerable research investment in ePRO systems. The findings of this study outline key system features and factors to support the successful implementation of ePROs in routine kidney care.Cite Now
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 98 条
  • [1] Aaronson N., 2015, User's Guide to Implementing Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessment in Clinical Practice, Ved 2
  • [2] Beyond lip service and box ticking: how effective patient engagement is integral to the development and delivery of patient-reported outcomes
    Absolom, K.
    Holch, P.
    Woroncow, B.
    Wright, E. P.
    Velikova, G.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (05) : 1077 - 1085
  • [3] A narrative review of current evidence supporting the implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in the management of chronic diseases
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Nair, Devika
    Peipert, John Devin
    Schick-Makaroff, Kara
    Mucsi, Istvan
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN CHRONIC DISEASE, 2021, 12
  • [4] Development and usability testing of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) system for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Kyte, Derek
    Cockwell, Paul
    Marshall, Tom
    Dutton, Mary
    Walmsley-Allen, Natalie
    Auti, Ram
    Calvert, Melanie
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2018, 101 : 120 - 127
  • [5] Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to promote quality of care and safety in the management of patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney disease (PRO-trACK project): a mixed-methods project protocol
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Kyte, Derek
    Cockwell, Paul
    Marshall, Tom
    Dutton, Mary
    Slade, Anita
    Marklew, Neil
    Price, Gary
    Verdi, Rav
    Waters, Judi
    Sharpe, Keeley
    Calvert, Melanie
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (06):
  • [6] Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in adult patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Kyte, Derek
    Cockwell, Paul
    Marshall, Tom
    Gheorghe, Adrian
    Keeley, Thomas
    Slade, Anita
    Calvert, Melanie
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (06):
  • [7] Visualization formats of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a systematic review about preferences and interpretation accuracy
    Albers, Elaine A. C.
    Fraterman, Itske
    Walraven, Iris
    Wilthagen, Erica
    Schagen, Sanne B.
    van der Ploeg, Iris M.
    Wouters, Michel W. J. M.
    van de Poll-franse, Lonneke V.
    de Ligt, Kelly M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2022, 6 (01)
  • [8] SYMPTOM BURDEN IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE: A REVIEW OF RECENT LITERATURE
    Almutary, Hayfa
    Bonner, Ann
    Douglas, Clint
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RENAL CARE, 2013, 39 (03) : 140 - 150
  • [9] The Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients Treated With Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Perspective
    Anderson, Nicola Elizabeth
    Calvert, Melanie
    Cockwell, Paul
    Dutton, Mary
    Kyte, Derek
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2019, 74 (03) : 399 - 406
  • [10] Using patient-reported outcome measures during the management of patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring treatment with haemodialysis (PROM-HD): a qualitative study
    Anderson, Nicola Elzabeth
    McMullan, Christel
    Calvert, Melanie
    Dutton, Mary
    Cockwell, Paul
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan L.
    Kyte, Derek
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (08):