Network-Coding-Enabled and QoS-Aware Message Delivery for Wireless Sensor Networks

被引:1
作者
Abdullah, Saima [1 ]
Asghar, Mamoona N. N. [2 ]
Fleury, Martin [3 ]
Mushtaq, Zaigham [1 ]
机构
[1] Islamia Univ Bahawalpur, Dept Comp Sci, Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan
[2] Univ Galway, Sch Comp Sci, Galway H91 TK33, Ireland
[3] Univ Suffolk, Sch Sci Technol & Engn, Ipswich IP4 1QJ, England
关键词
Energy efficiency; Wireless sensor network; Lower latency; Network coding; Quality-of-Service; ROUTING PROTOCOL; EFFICIENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11277-023-10613-y
中图分类号
TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0809 ;
摘要
Message-transmission energy expenditure dominates battery lifetime in a Wireless Sensor Network (WSN). This paper newly combines network coding with a brokered WSN architecture to decrease the number of messages by means of message aggregation. It also facilitates low-latency delivery of critical messages and improves the overall energy efficiency of a WSN. Sensor nodes are arranged into subgroups, in each of which a broker separates messages into High Priority (HP) and Best Effort (BE) queues. Both arriving HP and BE messages are separately aggregated through network coding and, according to priority, are forwarded to the next broker or eventually to a data sink, where they are decoded. Service differentiation, together with network coding, prolongs the lifetime of the network by reducing the amount of energy consumed in brokers and increases message throughput by reducing waiting times at intermediate brokers. Best-effort message latency was reduced message as well as for high-priority messages. Without network coding all WSN nodes had run out of energy, whereas with the network-coded approach, twenty percent of the sensor nodes were still alive. This compares with some prior research which provides one or more of low message latency, increased message throughput, reduced WSN energy consumption, and prioritized queueing but not all these features together.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 359
页数:31
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Abdullah S, 2013, 2013 IEEE ONLINE CONFERENCE ON GREEN COMMUNICATIONS (ONLINEGREENCOM), P175, DOI 10.1109/OnlineGreenCom.2013.6731048
[2]  
Abo-Zahhad M, 2015, 2015 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY AWARE COMPUTING SYSTEMS & APPLICATIONS (ICEAC)
[3]   Network information flow [J].
Ahlswede, R ;
Cai, N ;
Li, SYR ;
Yeung, RW .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2000, 46 (04) :1204-1216
[4]   A Novel Blockchain Based Secured and QoS Aware IoT Vehicular Network in Edge Cloud Computing [J].
Ahmed, Adeel ;
Abdullah, Saima ;
Iftikhar, Saman ;
Ahmad, Israr ;
Ajmal, Siddiqa ;
Hussain, Qamar .
IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 :77707-77722
[5]  
Akkaya K., 2005, Ad Hoc Networks, V3, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.adhoc.2003.09.010
[6]   A survey on sensor networks [J].
Akyildiz, IF ;
Su, WL ;
Sankarasubramaniam, Y ;
Cayirci, E .
IEEE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE, 2002, 40 (08) :102-114
[7]  
Al-Hawri E., 2020, P 11 DOCT C COMP EL, P129
[8]  
Alharthi SA, 2016, 2016 24TH TELECOMMUNICATIONS FORUM (TELFOR), P148
[9]  
Amru M, 2020, INTEL SYST REF LIBR, V172, P125, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-32644-9_14
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Network coding: an introduction