Using Recovery Capital to Predict Retention and Change in Recovery Residences in Virginia, USA

被引:13
作者
Best, David [1 ,5 ]
Sondhi, Arun [2 ]
Best, Jessica [3 ]
Lehman, John [3 ]
Grimes, Anthony [4 ]
Conner, Matthew [4 ]
DeTriquet, Robert [4 ]
机构
[1] Leeds Trinity Univ Coll, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Leeds, England
[2] Therapeut Solut, London, England
[3] Recovery Outcomes Inst, Boynton Beach, FL USA
[4] Virginia Assoc Recovery Residences, Richmond, VA USA
[5] Leeds Trinity Univ Coll, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Leeds LS18 5HD, England
关键词
Recovery residences; recovery capital; retention; barriers to recovery; MULTIPLE IMPUTATION; VALIDATION; ALCOHOL;
D O I
10.1080/07347324.2023.2182246
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Interest in recovery capital has been growing and there have been increased attempts to quantify this concept. The current paper uses the REC-CAP, a standardized assessment of recovery capital, to predict retention across multiple recovery residence settings and quantify changes in recovery capital and barriers to recovery over the initial period of residence. The REC-CAP was administered by peer navigators at admission and at 90-day intervals thereafter in recovery residences in Virginia, US. Strong effects predicting retention, changes in barriers and recovery capital growth were reported based on risk-taking and addressing acute housing concerns. The strongest effects predicting retention in recovery residences were for people not using substances and not being Black or African American. Reducing barriers to recovery and to improving recovery capital focused on avoiding ongoing substance use, lack of support needs around accommodation, higher psychological wellbeing and measures associated with social support and quality of life. There is a need to develop a holistic, tailored package of support for people in recovery residents to address these core concerns.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 262
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, SAMHSAS WORKING DEFI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Prison Reform Trust Bromley Prisons Briefings Factfile
[3]   Defining and operationalizing the phenomena of recovery: a working definition from the recovery science research collaborative [J].
Ashford, Robert D. ;
Brown, Austin ;
Brown, Tiffany ;
Callis, Jason ;
Cleveland, H. Harrington ;
Eisenhart, Emily ;
Groover, Hillary ;
Hayes, Nicholas ;
Johnston, Teresa ;
Kimball, Thomas ;
Manteuffel, Brigitte ;
McDaniel, Jessica ;
Montgomery, Lindsay ;
Phillips, Shane ;
Polacek, Michael ;
Statman, Matt ;
Whitney, Jason .
ADDICTION RESEARCH & THEORY, 2019, 27 (03) :179-188
[4]   Multiple imputation by chained equations: what is it and how does it work? [J].
Azur, Melissa J. ;
Stuart, Elizabeth A. ;
Frangakis, Constantine ;
Leaf, Philip J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2011, 20 (01) :40-49
[5]   The science of recovery capital: where do we go from here? [J].
Best, David ;
Hennessy, Emily A. .
ADDICTION, 2022, 117 (04) :1139-1145
[6]  
Bourdieu P., 1984, Distinction: a social critique of the judgment of taste
[7]   Psychometric Properties of the Assessment of Recovery Capital (ARC) Instrument in a Diverse Low-Income Sample [J].
Bowen, Elizabeth A. ;
Scott, Carol F. ;
Irish, Andrew ;
Nochajski, Thomas H. .
SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, 2020, 55 (01) :108-118
[8]  
Brown H., 2015, Applied mixed models in medicine, V3
[9]   Can Recovery Capital Predict Addiction Problem Severity? [J].
Burns, John ;
Marks, Douglas .
ALCOHOLISM TREATMENT QUARTERLY, 2013, 31 (03) :303-320
[10]   Recovery capital pathways: Modelling the components of recovery wellbeing [J].
Cano, Ivan ;
Best, David ;
Edwards, Michael ;
Lehman, John .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2017, 181 :11-19