A Comprehensive Review of Various Machine Learning Techniques used in Load Forecasting

被引:2
作者
Mohan, Divya Priyadharshini [1 ]
Subathra, M. S. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Karunya Inst Technol Sci, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Coimbatore, India
关键词
Artificial neural networks; deep learning; load forecasting; machine learning; computational modeling; NYISO dataset; NEURAL-NETWORK; SYSTEM; MODEL; REGRESSION; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.2174/2352096515666220930144336
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Background Load forecasting is a crucial element in power utility business load forecasting and has influenced key decision-makers in the industry to predict future energy demand with a low error percentage to supply consumers with load-shedding-free and uninterruptible power. By applying the right technique, utility companies may save millions of dollars by using load prediction with a lower proportion of inaccuracy. Aims This study paper aims to analyse the recently published papers (using the New York Independent System Operator's database) on load forecasting and find the most optimised forecasting method for electric load forecasting. Methods An overview of existing electric load forecasting technology with a complete examination of multiple load forecasting models and an in-depth analysis of their MAPE benefits, challenges, and influencing factors is presented. The paper reviews hybrid models created by combining two or more predictive models, each offering better performance due to their algorithm's merits. Hybrid models outperform other machine learning (ML) approaches in accurately forecasting power demand. Results Through the study, it is understood that hybrid methods show promising features. Deep learning algorithms were also studied for long-term forecasting. Conclusion In the future, we can extend the study by extensively studying deep learning methods.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 210
页数:14
相关论文
共 140 条
[81]  
Lu N., 2009, 2009 INT C INFORM EN, P1, DOI [10.1109/ICIECS.2009.5366400, DOI 10.1109/ICIECS.2009.5366400]
[82]  
Marwala L., 2017, P 9 IEEE GCC C EXH G, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/IEEEGCC.2017.8448125
[83]  
Medykovskvi M., 2018, P 2018 IEEE 13 INT S, P432, DOI 10.1109/STC-CSIT.2018.8526617
[84]  
Mori H., 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL), P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/PESGM.2012.6345687
[85]   Improving Load Forecasting Process for a Power Distribution Network Using Hybrid AI and Deep Learning Algorithms [J].
Motepe, Sibonelo ;
Hasan, Ali N. ;
Stopforth, Riaan .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :82584-82598
[86]  
Naz A, 2020, INT WIREL COMMUN, P2124, DOI 10.1109/IWCMC48107.2020.9148094
[87]  
Naz A, 2018, 2018 IEEE 21ST INTERNATIONAL MULTI-TOPIC CONFERENCE (INMIC)
[88]  
Niu DX, 2007, PROCEEDINGS OF 2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-7, P2719
[89]   Mid-term load forecasting based on dynamic least squares SVMs [J].
Niu, Dong-Xiao ;
Li, Wei ;
Cheng, Li-Min ;
Gu, Xi-Hua .
PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-7, 2008, :800-+
[90]  
Niu DX, 2005, Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Vols 1-9, P4260