Neoliberalization and urban redevelopment: the impact of public policy on multiple dimensions of spatial inequality

被引:13
作者
Uitermark, Justus [1 ,2 ]
Hochstenbach, Cody [1 ]
Groot, Jolien [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Inst Social Sci Res, Ctr Urban Studies, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Inst Social Sci Res, Ctr Urban Studies, POB 15629, NL-1001 NC Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Spatial inequality; segregation; urban policy; neoliberalism; Amsterdam; Rotterdam; NEW-BUILD GENTRIFICATION; SOCIAL MIX; HOUSING POLICY; NEIGHBORHOODS; SEGREGATION; LONDON; POLARIZATION; MODEL; CITY;
D O I
10.1080/02723638.2023.2203583
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This paper examines the impact of public policy on different dimensions of spatial inequality. We not only study residential segregation but also housing market access and inequality in terms of neighborhood status. We chart the impact of urban redevelopment policies in two Dutch cities-Amsterdam and Rotterdam-through a unique longitudinal and full-population dataset that enables us to distinguish the contributions of demolition, new construction, and tenure conversion to various dimensions of spatial inequality. We find that policy measures that reduce segregation may reduce access to housing (as happened in Amsterdam) while measures that promote upgrading may exacerbate inequalities between neighborhoods (as happened in Rotterdam). Distinguishing between different kinds of policy measures and dimensions of spatial inequality, we argue, allows for a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of urban redevelopment and better insight into the trade-offs involved in policy decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 564
页数:24
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Nuancing the international debate on social mix: evidence from Copenhagen [J].
Alves, Sonia .
HOUSING STUDIES, 2019, :1174-1197
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Inequality in the gentrifying European city
[3]   Mixed-Tenure Neighbourhoods in London: Policy Myth or Effective Device to Alleviate Deprivation? [J].
Arbaci, Sonia ;
Rae, Ian .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH, 2013, 37 (02) :451-479
[4]  
August M., 2008, CANADIAN J URBAN RES, V17, P82
[5]   How spatial segregation changes over time: sorting out the sorting processes [J].
Bailey, Nick .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 2012, 44 (03) :705-722
[6]  
Bernt Matthias., 2022, The Commodification Gap: Gentrification and Public Policy in London, V1st
[7]   AFTER URBAN RESTRUCTURING: RELOCATIONS AND SEGREGATION IN DUTCH CITIES [J].
Bolt, Gideon ;
Van Kempen, Ronald ;
Van Weesep, Jan .
TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR ECONOMISCHE EN SOCIALE GEOGRAFIE, 2009, 100 (04) :502-518
[8]   Housing Liberalisation and Gentrification: The Social Effects of Tenure Conversions in Amsterdam [J].
Boterman, Willem R. ;
van Gent, Wouter P. C. .
TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR ECONOMISCHE EN SOCIALE GEOGRAFIE, 2014, 105 (02) :140-160
[9]  
Boterman Willem R., 2023, TIJDSCHR ECON SOC GE
[10]  
Brenner Neil., 2004, New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood