Correlation and causality between carbon and energy markets: a complexity perspective

被引:6
作者
Yin, Jiuli [1 ]
Zhu, Yan [1 ]
Fan, Xinghua [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ, Ctr Energy Dev & Environm Protect Strategy Res, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon market; Energy market; Complexity; Critical time delay; Correlation; Causality; STOCK-MARKET; VOLATILITY SPILLOVER; INFORMATION-FLOW; PHASE-II; ELECTRICITY; PRICES; FUEL; COAL;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-24122-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Global warming obliges humans to focus on the relationships between carbon and energy markets. This study considers the relationship between carbon and energy markets from a complexity perspective. Chinese carbon prices and four energy indexes are selected as empirical variables. First, the complexities of carbon and energy markets are measured by multi-scale fuzzy entropy. The critical time delay of the series is then obtained by maximizing the Pearson coefficients between these markets. Further, analysis of the detrended cross-correlation coefficient confirms the existence of time delay. Finally, transfer entropy is applied to investigate the causality pertaining to dynamic complexity. Results of fuzzy entropy analysis reveal that the carbon market has lower complexity than energy markets. Meanwhile, multi-scale results indicate greater complexity on the small time scales in all markets than on the large time scales. The critical time delay is found to be about 50, which maximizes the correlation coefficient. Finally, causality between carbon and energy markets varies. Expectations in the carbon market impact oil gas and coal markets; electricity and new energy affect the carbon market; and cross-causality exists in the relationship between coal and carbon markets. The participants should focus on the information transmission between carbon and energy markets.
引用
收藏
页码:28597 / 28608
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Price determination in the EU ETS market: Theory and econometric analysis with market fundamentals
    Aatola, Piia
    Ollikainen, Markku
    Toppinen, Anne
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 36 : 380 - 395
  • [2] Benesty J., 2009, Springer topics in signal processing, VVolume 2, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-00296-0_5, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-00296-0_5, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-00296-0_5/COVER]
  • [3] Bunn D.W., 2008, Markets for Carbon and Power Pricing in Europe: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Analysis, P145
  • [4] Busch C., 2022, CHINAS EMISSIONS TRA
  • [5] When carbon emission trading meets a regulated industry: Evidence from the electricity sector of China
    Cao, Jing
    Ho, Mun S.
    Ma, Rong
    Teng, Fei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2021, 200
  • [6] Measuring complexity using FuzzyEn, ApEn, and SampEn
    Chen, Weiting
    Zhuang, Jun
    Yu, Wangxin
    Wang, Zhizhong
    [J]. MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2009, 31 (01) : 61 - 68
  • [7] VOLATILITY SPILLOVER AND DYNAMIC CORRELATION BETWEEN THE CARBON MARKET AND ENERGY MARKETS
    Chen, Yufeng
    Qu, Fang
    Li, Wenqi
    Chen, Minghui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 20 (05) : 979 - 999
  • [8] Forecast of the time lag effect of carbon emissions based on a temporal input -output approach
    Cheng, Yongwei
    Wang, Chao
    Fan, Tijun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 293
  • [9] Carbon price drivers: Phase I versus Phase II equilibrium?
    Creti, Anna
    Jouvet, Pierre-Andre
    Mignon, Valerie
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (01) : 327 - 334
  • [10] The electricity market in a renewable energy system
    Djorup, Soren
    Thellufsen, Jakob Zinck
    Sorknaes, Peter
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 162 : 148 - 157