Assessing how well students understand the molecular basis of evolution by natural selection

被引:2
作者
Sievers, Matt [1 ]
Reemts, Connor [1 ]
Dickinson, Katherine J. [1 ]
Mukerji, Joya [1 ,2 ]
Beltran, Ismael Barreras [1 ]
Theobald, Elli J. [1 ]
Velasco, Vicente [1 ]
Freeman, Scott [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Biol, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Calif State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Sacramento, CA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Biol, Box 355320, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
E-ACORNS; evolution assessment; molecular synthesis; SENSE EXCEPT; BIOLOGY; EXPLANATIONS; MODELS; CONCEPTIONS; DESIGN; LIGHT; DNA;
D O I
10.1002/bmb.21697
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Researchers have called for undergraduate courses to update teaching frameworks based on the Modern Synthesis with insights from molecular biology, by stressing the molecular underpinnings of variation and adaptation. To support this goal, we developed a modified version of the widely used Assessing Conceptual Reasoning of Natural Selection (ACORNS) instrument. The expanded tool, called the E-ACORNS, is explicitly designed to test student understanding of the connections among genotypes, phenotypes, and fitness. E-ACORNS comprises a slight modification to the ACORNS open-response prompts and a new scoring rubric. The rubric is based on five core concepts in evolution by natural selection, with each concept broken into elements at the novice, intermediate, and expert-level understanding. Initial tests of the E-ACORNS showed that (1) upper-level undergraduates can score responses reliably and quickly, and (2) students who were just starting an introductory biology series for majors do not yet grasp the molecular basis of phenotypic variation and its connection to fitness.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 220
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Development and Validation of Instruments to Measure Learning of Expert-Like Thinking
    Adams, Wendy K.
    Wieman, Carl E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2011, 33 (09) : 1289 - 1312
  • [2] American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2011, Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action
  • [3] Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection
    Anderson, DL
    Fisher, KM
    Norman, GJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2002, 39 (10) : 952 - 978
  • [4] STUDENT CONCEPTIONS OF NATURAL-SELECTION AND ITS ROLE IN EVOLUTION
    BISHOP, BA
    ANDERSON, CW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 1990, 27 (05) : 415 - 427
  • [5] Bray Speth Elena, 2009, Evolution Education and Outreach, V2, P415
  • [6] How Students Think about Experimental Design: Novel Conceptions Revealed by in-Class Activities
    Brownell, Sara E.
    Wenderoth, Mary Pat
    Theobald, Roddy
    Okoroafor, Nnadozie
    Koval, Mikhail
    Freeman, Scott
    Walcher-Chevillet, Cristina L.
    Crowe, Alison J.
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 2014, 64 (02) : 125 - 137
  • [7] Developing the Physics Teacher Education Program Analysis rubric: Measuring features of thriving programs
    Chasteen, Stephanie, V
    Scherr, Rachel E.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2020, 16 (01):
  • [8] Chown M., 2013, What a Wonderful World: One Man's Attempt to Explain the Big Stuff
  • [9] Relations between Intuitive Biological Thinking and Biological Misconceptions in Biology Majors and Nonmajors
    Coley, John D.
    Tanner, Kimberly
    [J]. CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2015, 14 (01):
  • [10] CENTRAL DOGMA OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
    CRICK, F
    [J]. NATURE, 1970, 227 (5258) : 561 - &