A dichotomy between democracy and personal freedom on the spread of COVID-19

被引:1
作者
Ang, Joshua Ping [1 ]
Gao, Guanlin [2 ,3 ]
Sparks, Andrew [4 ]
机构
[1] Rogers State Univ, Dept Business, Claremore, OK USA
[2] Chaminade Univ Honolulu, Sch Business & Commun, Honolulu, HI 96816 USA
[3] Chaminade Univ Honolulu, Econ Educ Ctr Excellence, Honolulu, HI 96816 USA
[4] Colorado State Univ Pueblo, Dept Business, Pueblo, CO USA
关键词
COVID-19; Pandemic; Personal freedom; Democracy; Regional effects;
D O I
10.1108/IJSE-12-2021-0769
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The authors analyze the effects of political freedom and personal freedom on the spread of COVID-19 in a cross-country study. The authors also investigate how income inequality, urbanization and previous experience with a similar respiratory epidemic/pandemic, such as SARS and MERS, affect the spread of COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach - The authors employ data from 102 countries to examine the relationship of countries' economic and sociopolitical factors, such as political freedom and personal freedom and their COVID-19 infection cases per million population at 120 days, 150 days and 180 days after the reported 10th infection case. The authors also include the log term of real GDP per capita to control for counties' economic development and regional dummies to control for regional-specific effects. Findings - Results of this study show that personal freedom, rather than democracy, has a significant positive effect on countries' COVID-19 infection cases. On the contrary, democracy has a negative impact on the infection rate. The authors also find that socioeconomic factors such as higher income inequality and urbanization rate adversely affect the COVID-19 infection cases. A larger older population is associated with fewer infection cases, holding everything else equal. Previous experiences with the coronavirus crisis affect countries only at the 120 days mark. Real GDP per capita has no significant effect. Originality/value - The main contribution of this paper is to jointly explore personal freedom, which implies a social framework with more emphasis on self-value and self-realization and political freedom, that is, democracy. The authors show that it is personal freedom, rather than democracy, that contributes to higher COVID-19 infection cases. Democracy, on the other hand, reduces the number of infection cases. Peer review - The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-12-2021-0769
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 334
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] COVID-19: Lessons for an Urban(izing) World
    Acuto, Michele
    [J]. ONE EARTH, 2020, 2 (04): : 317 - 319
  • [2] The Efficacy of Lockdown Against COVID-19: A Cross-Country Panel Analysis
    Alfano, Vincenzo
    Ercolano, Salvatore
    [J]. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2020, 18 (04) : 509 - 517
  • [3] The Effects and Counter-Effects of Unemployment and Stringency Responses to COVID-19: An International Analysis Using Simultaneous Equations Models
    Ang, Joshua Ping
    Dong, Fang
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2022, 54 (11) : 1278 - 1300
  • [4] Education in Mathematics and the Spread of COVID-19
    Ang, Joshua Ping
    Murray, Tim
    [J]. EASTERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2021, 47 (04) : 571 - 589
  • [5] COVID-19: effectiveness of socioeconomic factors in containing the spread and mortality
    Ang, Joshua Ping
    Dong, Fang
    Patalinghug, Jason
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2021, 35 (02) : 164 - 187
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2022, MULT IND CLUST SURV
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2021, OECD Stat
  • [8] Barro R.J., 2018, DATASET ED ATTAINMEN
  • [9] Benfer EA., 2020, Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, V19, P122, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3636975
  • [10] Brown Caitlin S., 2020, 27549 NBER