Critical method of document analysis

被引:13
作者
Sankofa, Nicole [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Texas, Dept Educ Psychol, 1300 W Highland St, Denton, TX 76201 USA
关键词
Critical theory; document analysis; qualitative; documentality;
D O I
10.1080/13645579.2022.2113664
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
While critical methods have gained popularity in recent times, analysis of documents remains an under-explored area for developing methods of elevating the perspectives of oppressed populations. This is important given the agentic role documents play in systemic and institutionalized oppression. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to use a critical paradigmatic approach, combined with hermeneutic and phenomenological procedures, to develop the Critical Method of Document Analysis (CMDA). This four-stage method is developed using an exemplar study examining historical tools of oppression in a Southern metropolitan area's city-planning documents. CMDA provides a systematic process for investigating documents using the perspectives of marginalized communities. The article concludes with a discussion of the significance, limitations, and implications of CMDA.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 757
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Documenting Napping: The Agentic Force of Documents and Human Action [J].
Alasuutari, Maarit .
CHILDREN & SOCIETY, 2015, 29 (03) :219-230
[2]   Voicing the child? A case study in Finnish early childhood education [J].
Alasuutari, Maarit .
CHILDHOOD-A GLOBAL JOURNAL OF CHILD RESEARCH, 2014, 21 (02) :242-259
[3]   Tracking discourse and qualitative document analysis [J].
Altheide, DL .
POETICS, 2000, 27 (04) :287-299
[4]  
Andina T., 2016, ONTOLOGY SOCIAL REAL, P57, DOI [10.1057/978-1-137-47244-1_2, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-47244-1_2]
[5]  
Atkinson P., 2004, QUALITATIVE RES THEO, V2nd, P56, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446282243.N25
[6]  
Atkinson P.A., 1997, Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice, P45
[7]  
Bernal D.D., 2002, Qualitative Inquiry, V8, P105, DOI [10.1177/107780040200800107, DOI 10.1177/107780040200800107]
[8]   Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method [J].
Bowen, Glenn A. .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (02) :27-+
[9]  
Cowie SarahE., 2011, The Plurality of Power, P105, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-8306-0_6
[10]  
Ferraris M, 2018, LAW TEXT CULT, V22, P21