Flexible structure learning under uncertainty

被引:1
作者
Wang, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Gates, Vael [3 ]
Shen, Yuan [4 ]
Tino, Peter [5 ]
Kourtzi, Zoe [6 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, CAS Ctr Excellence Brain Sci & Intelligence Techno, State Key Lab Brain & Cognit Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Dept Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Stanford Univ, Inst Human Ctr AI, Stanford, CA USA
[4] Nottingham Trent Univ, Sch Sci & Technol, Nottingham, England
[5] Univ Birmingham, Sch Comp Sci, Birmingham, England
[6] Univ Cambridge, Dept Psychol, Cambridge, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
structure learning; uncertainty; perceptual decisions; decision strategy; vision; OF-VIEW TEST; NEURONAL OSCILLATIONS; TEMPORAL STRUCTURE; WORKING-MEMORY; ATTENTION; STRATEGY; FEEDBACK; BRAIN; DYNAMICS; ACCOUNT;
D O I
10.3389/fnins.2023.1195388
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Experience is known to facilitate our ability to interpret sequences of events and make predictions about the future by extracting temporal regularities in our environments. Here, we ask whether uncertainty in dynamic environments affects our ability to learn predictive structures. We exposed participants to sequences of symbols determined by first-order Markov models and asked them to indicate which symbol they expected to follow each sequence. We introduced uncertainty in this prediction task by manipulating the: (a) probability of symbol co-occurrence, (b) stimulus presentation rate. Further, we manipulated feedback, as it is known to play a key role in resolving uncertainty. Our results demonstrate that increasing the similarity in the probabilities of symbol co-occurrence impaired performance on the prediction task. In contrast, increasing uncertainty in stimulus presentation rate by introducing temporal jitter resulted in participants adopting a strategy closer to probability maximization than matching and improving in the prediction tasks. Next, we show that feedback plays a key role in learning predictive statistics. Trial-by-trial feedback yielded stronger improvement than block feedback or no feedback; that is, participants adopted a strategy closer to probability maximization and showed stronger improvement when trained with trial-by-trial feedback. Further, correlating individual strategy with learning performance showed better performance in structure learning for observers who adopted a strategy closer to maximization. Our results indicate that executive cognitive functions (i.e., selective attention) may account for this individual variability in strategy and structure learning ability. Taken together, our results provide evidence for flexible structure learning; individuals adapt their decision strategy closer to probability maximization, reducing uncertainty in temporal sequences and improving their ability to learn predictive statistics in variable environments.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   On the Origins of Suboptimality in Human Probabilistic Inference [J].
Acerbi, Luigi ;
Vijayakumar, Sethu ;
Wolpert, Daniel M. .
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2014, 10 (06)
[2]   When less is more: Enhanced statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies after disruption of bilateral DLPFC [J].
Ambrus, Geza Gergely ;
Vekony, Teodora ;
Janacsek, Karolina ;
Trimborn, Anna B. C. ;
Kovacs, Gyula ;
Nemeth, Dezso .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2020, 114
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Theoretical neuroscience: Computationl and mathematical modeling of neural systems
[5]   Statistical Learning: From Acquiring Specific Items to Forming General Rules [J].
Aslin, Richard N. ;
Newport, Elissa L. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 21 (03) :170-176
[6]   Interactions between attention and working memory [J].
Awh, E ;
Vogel, EK ;
Oh, SH .
NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 139 (01) :201-208
[7]   Knowing how much you don't know: a neural organization of uncertainty estimates [J].
Bach, Dominik R. ;
Dolan, Raymond J. .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 13 (08) :572-586
[8]   Learning to predict is spared in mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease [J].
Baker, Rosalind ;
Bentham, Peter ;
Kourtzi, Zoe .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2015, 233 (10) :2859-2867
[9]   Online neural monitoring of statistical learning [J].
Batterink, Laura J. ;
Paller, Ken A. .
CORTEX, 2017, 90 :31-45
[10]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436