Are multiword frequency effects stronger in non-native than in native speakers?

被引:0
作者
Ishida, Tomomi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nihon Fukushi Univ, Mihama, Aichi, Japan
[2] 35-6 Egemae, Okuda, Mihama cho, Chita, Aichi 4703233, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Multiword frequency effects; Grammaticality judgment tasks; Vocabulary knowledge; Processing advantage; VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION; EYE-MOVEMENTS; FORMULAIC SEQUENCES; 2ND-LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE; LEARNERS; LENGTH; LINKS; L1;
D O I
10.1017/S1366728923000548
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This study investigated whether non-native English speakers showed a processing advantage for high-frequency multiword units (multiword frequency effects), and whether the effects differed between native and non-native speakers. Such a difference has been identified in relation to single-word processing. Native English speakers and intermediate learners of English with languages of different scripts (native speakers of Japanese and German) judged whether English multiword units were grammatical. A significant processing advantage was identified for both native and non-native participants. More importantly, the multiword frequency effects were stronger among non-native than native speakers. The discrepancy persisted even after including individual vocabulary knowledge as a predictor in the mixed-effect models. Furthermore, there was no significant different impact of the effects between two non-native groups, even though German participants responded quicker than Japanese participants. This indicates that the varying influence between L1 and L2 could be explained by within-language, not between-language, variables.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 305
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Altenberg B., 1998, Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications, P101, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780198294252.003.0005
[2]   Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items [J].
Baayen, R. H. ;
Davidson, D. J. ;
Bates, D. M. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) :390-412
[3]   A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English Multi-word patterns in speech and writing [J].
Biber, Douglas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CORPUS LINGUISTICS, 2009, 14 (03) :275-311
[4]  
BNC Consortium, 2001, BRIT NAT CORP 2 VERS
[5]   Visual word recognition in a second language: A test of the lexical entrenchment hypothesis with lexical decision times [J].
Brysbaert, Marc ;
Lagrou, Evelyne ;
Stevens, Michael .
BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2017, 20 (03) :530-548
[6]   Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers [J].
Conklin, Kathy ;
Schmitt, Norbert .
APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2008, 29 (01) :72-89
[7]   Processing of idioms by L2 learners of English [J].
Cooper, TC .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 1999, 33 (02) :233-262
[8]   Frequency effects in monolingual and bilingual natural reading [J].
Cop, Uschi ;
Keuleers, Emmanuel ;
Drieghe, Denis ;
Duyck, Wouter .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2015, 22 (05) :1216-1234
[9]  
Davies Mark., 2008, The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), DOI DOI 10.1017/9781108770750.002
[10]   The word frequency effect in first- and second-language word recognition: A lexical entrenchment account [J].
Diependaele, Kevin ;
Lemhofer, Kristin ;
Brysbaert, Marc .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 66 (05) :843-863