Implementing a Rapid Response Team A Quality Improvement Project in a Low- to Middle-Income Country

Background: The benefits of rapid response teams (RRTs) have been controversial with few studies conducted in low- to middle-income countries.Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of implementing an RRT on 4 patient outcomes.Methods: We conducted a quality improvement pre-and-post design using the Plan-Do-Study-Act model in a tertiary hospital in a low- to middle-income country. We collected data before and after implementing the RRT in 4 phases and over 4 years.Results: Survival to discharge after cardiac arrest was 25.0% per 1000 discharges in 2016 and increased to 50% in 2019, a 50% increase. The rate of activations per 1000 discharges was 20.45% for the code team in 2016 and 33.6% for the RRT team in 2019. Thirty-one patients who arrested were transferred to a critical care unit before implementing the RRT, and 33% of such patients were transferred after. The time it took the code team to arrive at the bedside was 3.1 minutes in 2016 and decreased to 1.7 minutes for the RRT team to arrive in 2019, a 46% decrease.Discussion and Clinical Implications: Implementing an RTT led by nurses in a low- to middle-income country increased the survival rate of patients who had a cardiac arrest by 50%. The role of nurses in improving patient outcomes and saving lives is substantial and empowers nurses to call for assistance to save patient lives who show early signs of a cardiac arrest. Hospital administrators should continue to use strategies to improve nurses' timely response to the clinical deterioration of patients and to continue to collect data to assess the effect of the RRT over time.