Tax incentive, R&D manipulation and enterprises' innovation performance: the moderating role of political connections

被引:12
作者
Xiong, Ran [1 ]
Wei, Ping [1 ]
Yang, Jingyi [1 ]
Cristofini, Luis Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ, Wuhan, Peoples R China
关键词
the recognition of HTEs; innovation performance; political connections; R&D manipulation; REAL EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; CORPORATE INNOVATION; PUBLIC SUBSIDIES; CREDITS; FIRMS; GOVERNMENT; FINANCE; ACCESS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1504/IJTM.2023.128795
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Mainland China has a tax incentive named the policy of recognising HTEs that provides a 15% preferential tax rate to enterprises whose investment in R & D exceeds a given notch. We evaluate how recognising HTEs affects enterprises' innovation performance and explore the moderating role of political connections and R & D manipulation. Results show that the recognition of HTEs relates positively to enterprises' innovation performance but that political connections negatively moderate the relationship between recognising HTEs and enterprises' innovation performance. However, the moderating effect exists only in regions with more government intervention, less financial development, and less protection for intellectual property. Further analysis shows that political connections significantly increase enterprises' efforts to manipulate reports of their R & D expenses, and such manipulation weakens the relationship between their R & D investment and output. Our conclusions provide evidence of the distortion created by this tax incentive, and they offer a theoretical reference for improving the policy of recognising HTEs.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 285
页数:23
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Innovation, Reallocation, and Growth [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Akcigit, Ufuk ;
Alp, Harun ;
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Kerr, William .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2018, 108 (11) :3450-3491
[2]  
Adler PaulS., 2002, ACAD MANAGE REV, V27, P17, DOI [DOI 10.2307/4134367, 10.5465/amr.2002.5922314]
[3]   Law, finance, and economic growth in China [J].
Allen, F ;
Qian, J ;
Qian, MJ .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 77 (01) :57-116
[4]   Persistence in R&D Performance and its Implications for the Granting of Subsidies [J].
Arque-Castells, Pere .
REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2013, 43 (03) :193-220
[5]   Innovation on demand-Can public procurement drive market success of innovations? [J].
Aschhoff, Birgit ;
Sofka, Wolfgang .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (08) :1235-1247
[6]   PUBLIC R&D POLICIES AND PRIVATE R&D INVESTMENT: A SURVEY OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE [J].
Becker, Bettina .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2015, 29 (05) :917-942
[7]   Cooperative R&D and firm performance [J].
Belderbos, R ;
Carree, M ;
Lokshin, B .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2004, 33 (10) :1477-1492
[8]   The Real Effects of Real Earnings Management: Evidence from Innovation [J].
Bereskin, Frederick L. ;
Hsu, Po-Hsuan ;
Rotenberg, Wendy .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2018, 35 (01) :525-557
[9]   Banking deregulation and industry structure: Evidence from the French banking reforms of 1985 [J].
Bertrand, Marianne ;
Schoar, Antoinette ;
Thesmar, David .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2007, 62 (02) :597-628
[10]   Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979-1997 [J].
Bloom, N ;
Griffith, R ;
Van Reenen, J .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2002, 85 (01) :1-31