Performance monitoring of constructed floating wetlands: Treating stormwater runoff during the construction phase of an urban residential development

被引:8
作者
Schwammberger, Peter F. [1 ]
Tondera, Katharina [2 ]
Headley, Tom R. [3 ]
Borne, Karine E. [4 ]
Yule, Catherine M. [1 ]
Tindale, Neil W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sunshine Coast, Sch Sci Technol & Engn, Maroochydore, Qld 4558, Australia
[2] REVERSAAL, INRAE, F-69625 Villeurbanne, France
[3] Wetland & Ecol Treatment Syst Ltd, Nelson Bay, NSW 2315, Australia
[4] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res, Private Bag 99940,Viaduct Harbour, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
关键词
Floating treatment wetlands; Stormwater pollution; Urban runoff; Pollutant treatment; Water sensitive urban design; Best Management Practices; Nature-based solution; REMOVAL; MANAGEMENT; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161107
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the context of climate change and global trend towards greenfield urbanisation, stormwater and transported pollutants are expected to increase, impairing receiving environments. Constructed floating wetlands (CFWs) can improve stormwater retention pond performance. However, performance data are currently largely restricted to mesocosm experiments, limiting design enhancement fit for field implementation. The present 12-month field study aims to fill part of these gaps by identifying limitations and necessary design improvements for CFWs on a large retention pond/lake. Water in a 2.6-ha lake receiving stormwater from a 45-ha urban area under development in subtropical Queensland, Australia, was recirculated during dry weather periods to minimise algal growth and the risks of blooms. Pollutant removal efficiencies of two full-scale CFWs were evaluated during storm events and dry weather periods as a function of inlet and outlet pollutant concentrations, flow and rainfall. Inlet TSS and TN concentrations in runoff during the construction phase of the development exceeded required water quality limits while TP inflow concentrations were low and often below the detection limit. Median pollutant load reduction efficiencies during storm-events were - 20 % TSS, -2 % TN and 22 % TP at CFW1 and 51 % TSS, 3 % TN and 17 % TP at CFW2, respectively. TSS and TN concentration removal efficiencies at CFW1 were low and highly variable, partly due to low inlet concentrations, high flow velocities and short hydraulic retention times (<1 day). However, CFW1 significantly reduced TSS concentrations during dry weather periods. In contrast, CFW2 significantly reduced TSS concentrations during both storm events and during inter-event periods. This study highlights treatment limitations associated to the operational conditions of CFWs at field-scale not identifiable in a mesocosm-scale study. Further research is necessary to investigate treatment performance of CFWs during the operational phase of the development with higher nutrient levels.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Characterization of wash-off from urban impervious surfaces and SuDS design criteria for source control under semi-arid conditions [J].
Andres-Domenech, Ignacio ;
Hernandez-Crespo, Carmen ;
Martin, Miguel ;
Andres-Valeri, Valerio C. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 612 :1320-1328
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Tropical Cyclone Debbie Technical Report
[3]  
BoM, 2019, MEAN ANN RAINF REC 1
[4]  
Boonsong K., 2008, Assumption University: Journal of Technology, V12, P73
[5]  
Borne K., 2013, THESIS U AUCKLAND NZ
[6]   Stormwater nitrogen removal performance of a floating treatment wetland [J].
Borne, Karine E. ;
Tanner, Chris C. ;
Fassman-Beck, Elizabeth A. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 68 (07) :1657-1664
[7]   Floating treatment wetlands: A review and bibliometric analysis [J].
Colares, Gustavo S. ;
Dell'Osbel, Naira ;
Wiesel, Patrik G. ;
Oliveira, Gislayne A. ;
Lemos, Pedro Henrique Z. ;
da Silva, Fagner P. ;
Lutterbeck, Carlos A. ;
Kist, Lourdes T. ;
Machado, Enio L. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 714
[8]  
Department of Planning and Local Government (DPLG), 2010, WATER SENSITIVE URBA
[9]  
Eaton A., 2005, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater
[10]   Evaluation of hydraulic performance indices for retention ponds [J].
Farjood, Arash ;
Melville, Bruce W. ;
Shamseldin, Asaad Y. ;
Adams, Keith N. ;
Khan, Sher .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 72 (01) :10-21