Survival in stage IV ovarian cancer with increased use of debulking surgery and bevacizumab

被引:3
|
作者
Verleye, Leen [1 ]
Castanares-Zapatero, Diego [1 ]
Devos, Carl [1 ]
De Gendt, Cindy [2 ]
Silversmit, Geert [2 ]
Van Damme, Nancy [2 ]
Hulstaert, Frank [1 ]
Thiry, Nancy [1 ]
Neyt, Mattias [1 ]
机构
[1] Belgian Hlth Care Knowledge Ctr, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Belgian Canc Registry, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Ovarian Cancer; Surgery; Medical Oncology; OPEN-LABEL; STANDARD CHEMOTHERAPY; EPITHELIAL OVARIAN; TRIAL; OUTCOMES; ICON7;
D O I
10.1136/ijgc-2022-003813
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives Advanced ovarian cancer has a poor prognosis, with a 5 year survival probability of <30%. Attempts to improve survival have focused on debulking surgery and systemic therapy. We assessed the evolution of treatment patterns and survival of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with specific attention to changes in survival after introducing bevacizumab. Methods Population based data from the Belgian Cancer Registry were coupled with administrative reimbursement data from the compulsory health insurance organizations and the national database where date of death is registered, based on the patient's unique national number. Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer stage IV diagnosed in 2004-17 were included. The proportion of patients who underwent debulking surgery and received bevacizumab was calculated per incidence year. Survival was compared for the three incidence periods (2004-08, 2009-13, 2014-17) and before and after the introduction of bevacizumab. Results 2034 patients with stage IV epitheial ovarian cancer were included. From 2012 onwards, uptake of bevacizumab increased, with 50% of patients with stage IV ovarian cancer diagnosed in 2017 receiving bevacizumab. The proportion of stage IV patients who underwent debulking surgery also increased over time, from 21.1% in 2004-08 to 50.4% and 45.4% in 2009-13 and 2014-17, respectively. The 3 year observed survival probability fluctuated between 27% and 42% without a trend over time. The increase in debulking surgery was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79 to 0.98) but the introduction of bevacizumab was not (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.03). For patients diagnosed in 2004, the mean cost per patient treated with oncological drugs was about (sic)12 500, which doubled to about (sic)25 000 for patients diagnosed in 2014 or later. Conclusions Despite a rise in the use of debulking surgery and the introduction of bevacizumab into clinical practice, no improvement in 3 year survival probability was observed for patients with advanced ovarian cancer in Belgium.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 548
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Rethinking Radical Surgery in Interval Debulking Surgery for Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Lee, Yong Jae
    Lee, Jung-Yun
    Nam, Eun Ji
    Kim, Sang Wun
    Kim, Sunghoon
    Kim, Young Tae
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (04)
  • [22] An Audit on Factors Delaying Time to Chemotherapy in Stage IIB-IV Ovarian Cancer Patients After Primary Debulking Surgery
    Modi, Kanika Batra
    Batra, Sandeep
    Sardana, Shefali
    Sharma, Nagender
    Pandey, Shubham
    Chaturvedi, Harit Kumar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 22 (02)
  • [23] Experience with PlasmaJet™ in debulking surgery in 87 patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer
    Volcke, Alexander
    Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els
    Han, Sileny
    Salihi, Rawand
    Van Gorp, Toon
    Vergote, Ignace
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 123 (04) : 1109 - 1114
  • [24] The role of interval debulking surgery in ovarian cancer
    Maria E. L. van der Burg
    Ignace Vergote
    Current Oncology Reports, 2003, 5 (6) : 473 - 481
  • [25] Is increased chronological age a contraindication to debulking surgery for elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer?
    Park, Soo Jin
    Mun, Jaehee
    Yim, Ga Won
    Lee, Maria
    Chung, Hyun Hoon
    Kim, Jae Weon
    Park, Noh Hyun
    Song, Yong Sang
    Kim, Hee Seung
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 42 (07) : 3254 - 3259
  • [26] Radical surgery versus standard surgery for primary cytoreduction of bulky stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer: an observational study
    Ren, Yulan
    Jiang, Rong
    Yin, Sheng
    You, Chao
    Liu, Dongli
    Cheng, Xi
    Tang, Jie
    Zang, Rongyu
    BMC CANCER, 2015, 15
  • [27] Prediction of optimal debulking surgery in ovarian cancer
    Song, Yong Jung
    GLAND SURGERY, 2021, 10 (03) : 1173 - 1181
  • [28] Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage in Ovarian Cancer Debulking Surgery and Its Impact on Overall Survival
    Koscielny, Arne
    Ko, Anna
    Egger, Eva K.
    Kuhn, Walter
    Kalff, Joerg C.
    Keyver-Paik, Mignon-Denise
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 39 (09) : 5209 - 5218
  • [29] Impact of delay in interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy on survival in ovarian cancer
    Khalil, Kheyal Azam
    Habib, Maria
    Usmani, Afshan Saeed
    Shah, Muhammad Ansab
    Anwer, Abdul Wahid
    Syed, Aamir Ali
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2025, 75 (04) : 583 - 586
  • [30] Use of ablation and ultrasonic aspiration at primary debulking surgery in advanced stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer
    Li, Sue
    Manning-Geist, Beryl
    Gockley, Allison
    Ramos, Amanda
    Sisodia, Rachel C.
    Del Carmen, Marcela
    Growdon, Whitfield B.
    Horowitz, Neil
    Berkowitz, Ross
    Worley Jr, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 (07) : 1052 - 1057