Simulating benefits, costs and trade-offs of spatial management in marine social-ecological systems

被引:3
作者
Ovando, Daniel [1 ,6 ,7 ]
Bradley, Darcy [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Burns, Echelle [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Thomas, Lennon [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Thorson, James [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Aquat & Fishery Sci, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Marine Sci Inst, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Bren Sch Environm Sci & Management, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Environm Markets Lab, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[5] NOAA, Habitat & Ecol Proc Res Program, Alaska Fisheries Sci Ctr, NMFS,NOAA, Seattle, WA USA
[6] Univ Washington, Sch Aquat & Fishery Sci, 1122 NE Boat St Box 355020, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[7] Interamer Trop Tuna Commiss, La Jolla, CA USA
关键词
bio-economic modelling; conservation planning; fisheries; marine protected areas; marine spatial planning; spatio-temporal modelling; PROTECTED AREAS; STOCK ASSESSMENT; FLEET DYNAMICS; MODEL; RESERVES; FISH; ECOSYSTEM; CONSEQUENCES; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1111/faf.12804
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Designing effective spatial management strategies is challenging because marine ecosystems are highly dynamic and opaque, and extractive entities such as fishing fleets respond endogenously to ecosystem changes in ways that depend on ecological and policy context. We present a modelling framework, marlin, that can be used to efficiently simulate the bio-economic dynamics of marine systems in support of both management and research. We demonstrate marlin's capabilities by focusing on two case studies on the conservation and food production impacts of marine protected areas (MPAs): a coastal coral reef and a pelagic tuna fishery. In the coastal coral reef example, we explore how heterogeneity in species distributions and fleet preferences can affect distributional outcomes of MPAs. In the pelagic case study, we show how our model can be used to assess the climate resilience of different MPA design strategies, as well as the climate sensitivity of different fishing fleets. This paper demonstrates how intermediate complexity simulation of coupled bio-economic dynamics can help communities predict and potentially manage trade-offs among conservation, fisheries yields and distributional outcomes of management policies affected by spatial bio-economic dynamics.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 234
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluating Linked Social-Ecological Systems in Marine Protected Areas
    Lopez-Angarita, Juliana
    Moreno-Sanchez, Rocio
    Higinio Maldonado, Jorge
    Sanchez, Juan A.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2014, 7 (03): : 241 - 252
  • [22] Holistic management approach for social-ecological systems in Iran
    Kolahi, Mahdi
    Abdollahzadeh, Amir Hossein
    Noori, Roohollah
    ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS, 2025, 33
  • [23] Trade-Offs in Values Assigned to Ecological Goods and Services Associated with Different Coral Reef Management Strategies
    Hicks, Christina C.
    McClanahan, Tim R.
    Cinner, Joshua E.
    Hills, Jeremy M.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2009, 14 (01):
  • [24] Attending to spatial social-ecological sensitivities to improve trade-off analysis in natural resource management
    Okamoto, Daniel K.
    Poe, Melissa R.
    Francis, Tessa B.
    Punt, Andre E.
    Levin, Phillip S.
    Shelton, Andrew O.
    Armitage, Derek R.
    Cleary, Jaclyn S.
    Dressell, Sherri C.
    Jones, Russ
    Kitka, Harvey
    Lee, Lynn C.
    MacCall, Alec D.
    McIsaac, Jim A.
    Reifenstuhl, Steve
    Silver, Jennifer J.
    Schmidt, Joern O.
    Thornton, Thomas F.
    Voss, Ruediger
    Woodruff, John
    FISH AND FISHERIES, 2020, 21 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [25] Forest landscapes as social-ecological systems and implications for management
    Fischer, Alexandra Paige
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2018, 177 : 138 - 147
  • [26] Applying a Social-Ecological Systems Approach to Understanding Local Marine Management Trajectories in Northern Mozambique
    Osuka, Kennedy
    Rosendo, Sergio
    Riddell, Michael
    Huet, Jeremy
    Daide, Mario
    Chauque, Ercilio
    Samoilys, Melita
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (09)
  • [27] Delineating boundaries of social-ecological systems for landscape planning: A comprehensive spatial approach
    Martin-Lopez, Berta
    Palomo, Ignacio
    Garcia-Llorente, Marina
    Iniesta-Arandia, Irene
    Castro, Antonio J.
    Garcia Del Amo, David
    Gomez-Baggethun, Erik
    Montes, Carlos
    LAND USE POLICY, 2017, 66 : 90 - 104
  • [28] New Directions for Understanding the Spatial Resilience of Social-Ecological Systems
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    Morrison, Tiffany H.
    Hughes, Terence P.
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2017, 20 (04) : 649 - 664
  • [29] Dealing with the Social-Ecological Obstacle: Review of Decision-Making Approaches in Marine Management
    Zhou, Wei
    Chen, Yan
    Shu, Qiu
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [30] Simulating social-ecological systems: the Island Digital Ecosystem Avatars (IDEA) consortium
    Davies, Neil
    Field, Dawn
    Gavaghan, David
    Holbrook, Sally J.
    Planes, Serge
    Troyer, Matthias
    Bonsall, Michael
    Claudet, Joachim
    Roderick, George
    Schmitt, Russell J.
    Zettler, Linda Amaral
    Berteaux, Veronique
    Bossin, Herve C.
    Cabasse, Charlotte
    Collin, Antoine
    Deck, John
    Dell, Tony
    Dunne, Jennifer
    Gates, Ruth
    Harfoot, Mike
    Hench, James L.
    Hopuare, Marania
    Kirch, Patrick
    Kotoulas, Georgios
    Kosenkov, Alex
    Kusenko, Alex
    Leichter, James J.
    Lenihan, Hunter
    Magoulas, Antonios
    Martinez, Neo
    Meyer, Chris
    Stoll, Benoit
    Swalla, Billie
    Tartakovsky, Daniel M.
    Murphy, Hinano Teavai
    Turyshev, Slava
    Valdvinos, Fernanda
    Williams, Rich
    Wood, Spencer
    GIGASCIENCE, 2016, 5