A US-based national surveillance study for the susceptibility and epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile isolates with special reference to ridinilazole: 2020-2021

被引:9
作者
Snydman, D. R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mcdermott, L. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Thorpe, C. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Goldstein, E. J. C. [4 ]
Schuetz, A. N. [5 ]
Johnson, S. [6 ,7 ]
Gerding, D. N. [6 ]
Gluck, L. [8 ]
Bourdas, D. [8 ]
Carroll, K. C. [9 ]
Lancaster, C. K. [10 ]
Garey, K. W. [10 ]
Wang, Q. [11 ]
Walk, S. T. [11 ]
Duperchy, E. [12 ]
Silverman, Jared A.
机构
[1] Tufts Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02155 USA
[3] Stuart B Levy Ctr Integrated Management Antimicrob, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[4] Kindred Hlth Care Syst, Rancho Cucamonga, CA USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Sch Med & Sci, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Edward Hines Jr VA Hosp, Hines, IL USA
[7] Loyola Univ Med Ctr, Marywood, IL USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[9] Univ Houston, Coll Pharm, Houston, TX 77004 USA
[10] Summit Oxford Ltd, Abingdon, England
[11] Montana State Univ, Bozeman, MT USA
[12] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
ridinilazole; in vitro activity; Clostridioides difficile; US surveillance studies; ribotyping; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1128/aac.00349-23
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
We have previously reported on the susceptibility and epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile isolates from six geographically dispersed medical centers in the United States. This current survey was conducted with isolates collected in 2020-2021 from six geographically dispersed medical centers in the United States, with specific attention to susceptibility to ridinilazole as well as nine comparators. C. difficile isolates or stools from patients with C. difficile antibiotic-associated diarrhea were collected and referred to a central laboratory. After species confirmation of 300 isolates at the central laboratory, antibiotic susceptibilities were determined by the agar dilution method [M11-A9, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)] against the 10 agents. Ribotyping was performed by PCR capillary gel electrophoresis on all isolates. Ridinilazole had a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 90 of 0.25 mcg/mL, and no isolate had an MIC greater than 0.5 mcg/mL. In comparison, fidaxomicin had an MIC 90 of 0.5 mcg/mL. The vancomycin MIC 90 was 2 mcg/mL with a 0.7% resistance rate [both CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) criteria]. The metronidazole MIC 90 was 1 mcg/mL, with none resistant by CLSI criteria, and a 0.3% resistance rate by EUCAST criteria. Among the 50 different ribotypes isolated in the survey, the most common ribotype was 014-020 (14.0%) followed by 106 (10.3%), 027 (10%), 002 (8%), and 078-126 (4.3%). Ridinilazole maintained activity against all ribotypes and all strains resistant to any other agent tested. Ridinilazole showed excellent in vitro activity against C. difficile isolates collected between 2020 and 2021 in the United States, independent of ribotype.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Subtyping and antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 078/126 isolates of human and animal origin [J].
Alvarez-Perez, Sergio ;
Blanco, Jose L. ;
Harmanus, Celine ;
Kuijper, Ed ;
Garcia, Marta E. .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 199 :15-22
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANC
[3]   Detection of Mixed Populations of Clostridium difficile from Symptomatic Patients Using Capillary-Based Polymerase Chain Reaction Ribotyping [J].
Behroozian, Adam A. ;
Chludzinski, Jeffrey P. ;
Lo, Eugene S. ;
Ewing, Sarah A. ;
Waslawski, Sheila ;
Newton, Duane W. ;
Young, Vincent B. ;
Aronoff, David M. ;
Walk, Seth T. .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 34 (09) :961-966
[4]   The emergence of Clostridium difficile infection in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence and impact [J].
Borren, Nienke Z. ;
Ghadermarzi, Shadi ;
Hutfless, Susan ;
Ananthakrishnan, Ashwin N. .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (05)
[5]  
Burke KE, 2014, GUT LIVER, V8, P1, DOI [10.5009/gn1.2014.8.1.1, 10.5009/gnl.2014.8.1.1]
[6]  
CDC, 2019, Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, DOI DOI 10.15620/CDC:82532
[7]  
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2018, Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria
[8]  
CLSI, 2020, CLSI supplement M100, V30th
[9]  
Duperchy E., 2022, Ri-codify phase 3, randomized, double blind study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ridinilazole compared to vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection
[10]  
GEORGE WL, 1979, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V9, P214