Implementation and evaluation of an intelligent automatic treatment planning robot for prostate cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy

被引:5
作者
Gao, Yin [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Chenyang [1 ,2 ]
Jia, Xun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Park, Yang Kyun [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Innovat Technol Radiotherapy Computat & Hardware i, Dallas, TX USA
[2] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol & Mol Radiat Sci, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Automatic Treatment Planning; Artificial Intelligence; Stereotactic Radiotherapy; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM; PARAMETER OPTIMIZATION; IMRT; VARIABILITY; QUALITY; WEIGHTS; HEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109685
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We previously developed a virtual treatment planner (VTP), an artificial intelligence robot, oper-ating a treatment planning system (TPS). Using deep reinforcement learning guided by human knowl-edge, we trained the VTP to autonomously adjust relevant parameters in treatment plan optimization, similar to a human planner, to generate high-quality plans for prostate cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). This study describes the clinical implementation and evaluation of VTP.Materials and methods: We integrate VTP with Eclipse TPS using scripting Application Programming Interface. VTP observes dose-volume histograms of relevant structures, decides how to adjust dosimetric constraints, including doses, volumes, and weighting factors, and applies the adjustments to the TPS interface to launch the optimization engine. This process continues until a high-quality plan is achieved. We evaluated VTP's performance using the prostate SBRT case from the 2016 American Association of Medical Dosimetrist/Radiosurgery Society plan study with its plan scoring system, and compared to human-generated plans submitted to the challenge. Using the same scoring system, we also compared the plan quality of 36 prostate SBRT cases (20 planned with IMRT and 16 planned with VMAT) treated at our institution for both VTP and human-generated plans.Results: In the plan study case, VTP achieved a score of 142.1/150.0, ranking the third in the competition (median 134.6). For the clinical cases, VTP achieved 110.6 +/- 6.5 for 20 IMRT plans and 126.2 +/- 4.7 for 16 VMAT plans, similar to scores of human-generated plans with 110.4 +/- 7.0 for IMRT plans and 125.4 +/- 4.4 for VMAT plans. The workflow, plan quality and planning time of VTP were reviewed to be satisfactory by experienced physicists.Conclusion: We successfully implemented VTP to operate a TPS for autonomous human-like treatment planning for prostate SBRT.(c) 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V. Radiotherapy and Oncology 184 (2023) 109685
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Bellman R, 1964, DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING
  • [2] Interobserver variability in radiation therapy plan output: Results of a single-institution study
    Berry, Sean L.
    Boczkowski, Amanda
    Ma, Rongtao
    Mechalakos, James
    Hunt, Margie
    [J]. PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 6 (06) : 442 - 449
  • [3] Evaluation of fully automated a priori MCO treatment planning in VMAT for head-and-neck cancer
    Biston, Marie-Claude
    Costea, Madalina
    Gassa, Frederic
    Serre, Anne-Agathe
    Voet, Peter
    Larson, Randy
    Gregoire, Vincent
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 87 : 31 - 38
  • [4] Models for predicting objective function weights in prostate cancer IMRT
    Boutilier, Justin J.
    Lee, Taewoo
    Craig, Tim
    Sharpe, Michael B.
    Chan, Timothy C. Y.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (04) : 1586 - 1595
  • [5] Craft David L, 2012, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, V82, pe83, DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.007
  • [6] 3D radiotherapy dose prediction on head and neck cancer patients with a hierarchically densely connected U-net deep learning architecture
    Dan Nguyen
    Jia, Xun
    Sher, David
    Lin, Mu-Han
    Iqbal, Zohaib
    Liu, Hui
    Jiang, Steve
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (06)
  • [7] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription, recording, and delivery: Patterns of variability among institutions and treatment planning systems
    Das, Indra J.
    Cheng, Chee-Wai
    Chopra, Kashmiri L.
    Mitra, Raj K.
    Srivastava, Shiv P.
    Glatstein, Eli
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (05): : 300 - 307
  • [8] Modeling physician's preference in treatment plan approval of stereotactic body radiation therapy of prostate cancer
    Gao, Yin
    Shen, Chenyang
    Gonzalez, Yesenia
    Jia, Xun
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (11)
  • [9] Knowledge-based planning for intensity-modulated radiation therapy: A review of data-driven approaches
    Ge, Yaorong
    Wu, Q. Jackie
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : 2760 - 2775
  • [10] The use of a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm to increase flexibility in the search for better IMRT plans
    Holdsworth, Clay
    Kim, Minsun
    Liao, Jay
    Phillips, Mark
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (04) : 2261 - 2274