Comparative performance analysis of frontier-based efficiency measurement methods-A Monte Carlo simulation

被引:11
作者
Ahn, Heinz [1 ]
Clermont, Marcel [2 ]
Langner, Julia [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Dept Business Sci, Fallersleber Tor Wall 23, D-38100 Braunschweig, Germany
[2] Cooperat Univ Gera Eisenach, Wartenberg 2, D-99817 Eisenach, Germany
关键词
Data envelopment analysis; Stochastic frontier analysis; Stochastic non -smooth envelopment of data; Performance comparison; Monte Carlo simulation; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC FRONTIER; EXOGENOUS VARIABLES; COST-EFFICIENCY; MODELS; DEA; ESTIMATORS; SFA; BENCHMARKING; COLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2022.09.039
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In the last decades, various frontier-based efficiency measurement methods have been developed. So far, there is only limited knowledge with respect to the question to what extent a certain method is advan-tageous in different scenarios. We address this issue by a simulation study. In the respective scenarios, nine parameters are varied that reflect the specific structure of the data and knowledge about the com-petitive environment of the units to be evaluated. In contrast to other studies, we consider, e.g., multiple inputs and outputs. Furthermore, among other things, we assume lower levels of efficiency to reflect characteristics of markets with weaker competition. The methods compared are Data Envelopment Anal-ysis, Stochastic Frontier Analysis, Stochastic Non-Smooth Envelopment of Data, and Normalized Additive Analysis. They are assessed with respect to two main purposes of efficiency measurement, the correct es-timation of the efficiency degrees as well as the accurate determination of the ranking of the compared units. It is shown that, depending on the chosen purpose and the data scenario, there are major differ-ences regarding the performance of the methods. The results of our study provide a comprehensive basis for selecting between the methods. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 312
页数:19
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Comparing efficiency in a cross-country perspective: the case of Italian and Spanish state universities [J].
Agasisti, Tommaso ;
Perez-Esparrells, Carmen .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 59 (01) :85-103
[2]  
Ahn H., 2007, Z BETRIEBSWIRT, V77, P615, DOI [10.1007/s11573-007-0046-z, DOI 10.1007/S11573-007-0046-Z]
[3]  
Ahn H., 2022, CURR CONTENTS, V92, P1303, DOI [10.1007/s11573-022-01099-4, DOI 10.1007/S11573-022-01099-4]
[4]  
Ahn H., 2012, CURR CONTENTS, V7, P110
[5]  
Aigner D. J., 1977, J. Econ, V6, P21, DOI [10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5, DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5]
[6]  
Andor M., 2011, A Monte Carlo Simulation comparing DEA, SFA and two simple approaches to combine efficiency estimates
[7]   Pseudolikelihood estimation of the stochastic frontier model [J].
Andor, Mark ;
Parmeter, Christopher .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2017, 49 (55) :5651-5661
[8]   The StoNED age: the departure into a new era of efficiency analysis? A monte carlo comparison of StoNED and the "oldies" (SFA and DEA) [J].
Andor, Mark ;
Hesse, Frederik .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2014, 41 (01) :85-109
[9]   Combining uncertainty with uncertainty to get certainty? Efficiency analysis for regulation purposes [J].
Andor, Mark A. ;
Parmeter, Christopher ;
Sommer, Stephan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 274 (01) :240-252
[10]   CAPITAL-LABOR SUBSTITUTION AND ECONOMIC-EFFICIENCY [J].
ARROW, KJ ;
CHENERY, HB ;
MINHAS, BS ;
SOLOW, RM .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1961, 43 (03) :225-250