Prediction model for gestational diabetes mellitus using the XG Boost machine learning algorithm

被引:5
作者
Hu, Xiaoqi [1 ]
Hu, Xiaolin [2 ]
Yu, Ya [3 ]
Wang, Jia [4 ]
机构
[1] Yantian Dist Peoples Hosp, Dept Nursing, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Sch Basic Med Sci, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Guangzhou First Peoples Hosp, Dept Nursing, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Shenzhen Hosp Southern Med Univ, Dept Nursing, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
gestational diabetes mellitus; machine learning; prediction model; extreme gradient boosting; logistic regression; RISK; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.3389/fendo.2023.1105062
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo develop the extreme gradient boosting (XG Boost) machine learning (ML) model for predicting gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) compared with a model using the traditional logistic regression (LR) method. MethodsA case-control study was carried out among pregnant women, who were assigned to either the training set (these women were recruited from August 2019 to November 2019) or the testing set (these women were recruited in August 2020). We applied the XG Boost ML model approach to identify the best set of predictors out of a set of 33 variables. The performance of the prediction model was determined by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) to assess discrimination, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test and calibration plots to assess calibration. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was introduced to evaluate the clinical use of each of the models. ResultsA total of 735 and 190 pregnant women were included in the training and testing sets, respectively. The XG Boost ML model, which included 20 predictors, resulted in an AUC of 0.946 and yielded a predictive accuracy of 0.875, whereas the model using a traditional LR included four predictors and presented an AUC of 0.752 and yielded a predictive accuracy of 0.786. The HL test and calibration plots show that the two models have good calibration. DCA indicated that treating only those women whom the XG Boost ML model predicts are at risk of GDM confers a net benefit compared with treating all women or treating none. ConclusionsThe established model using XG Boost ML showed better predictive ability than the traditional LR model in terms of discrimination. The calibration performance of both models was good.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Risk factors associated with gestational diabetes mellitus: The role of pregnancy-induced hypertension and physical inactivity
    Aburezq, Maryam
    AlAlban, Fatima
    Alabdulrazzaq, Maryam
    Badr, Hanan
    [J]. PREGNANCY HYPERTENSION-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH, 2020, 22 : 64 - 70
  • [2] Bhaskaran K, 2018, LANCET DIABETES ENDO, V6, P944, DOI [10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30288-2, 10.1016/s2213-8587(18)30288-2]
  • [3] Elevated blood pressure in pregnant women with gestational diabetes according to the WHO criteria: importance of overweight
    Birukov, Anna
    Glintborg, Dorte
    Schulze, Matthias B.
    Jensen, Tina K.
    Kuxhaus, Olga
    Andersen, Louise B.
    Kraeker, Kristin
    Polemiti, Elli
    Jensen, Boye L.
    Jorgensen, Jan S.
    Dechend, Ralf
    Andersen, Marianne S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2022, 40 (08) : 1614 - 1623
  • [4] Introduction to Machine Learning, Neural Networks, and Deep Learning
    Choi, Rene Y.
    Coyner, Aaron S.
    Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree
    Chiang, Michael F.
    Campbell, J. Peter
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 9 (02):
  • [5] Machine Learning Models to Predict Childhood and Adolescent Obesity: A Review
    Colmenarejo, Gonzalo
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2020, 12 (08) : 1 - 31
  • [6] Predictive model for acute respiratory distress syndrome events in ICU patients in China using machine learning algorithms: a secondary analysis of a cohort study
    Ding, Xian-Fei
    Li, Jin-Bo
    Liang, Huo-Yan
    Wang, Zong-Yu
    Jiao, Ting-Ting
    Liu, Zhuang
    Yi, Liang
    Bian, Wei-Shuai
    Wand, Shu-Peng
    Zhu, Xi
    Sun, Tong-Wen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 17 (01)
  • [7] Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in mainland China: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gao, Chenghan
    Sun, Xin
    Lu, Li
    Liu, Fangwei
    Yuan, Jing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2019, 10 (01) : 154 - 162
  • [8] Improving the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for gestational diabetes prevention: a meta-analysis and meta-regression
    Guo, X-Y
    Shu, J.
    Fu, X-H
    Chen, X-P
    Zhang, L.
    Ji, M-X
    Liu, X-M
    Yu, T-T
    Sheng, J-Z
    Huang, H-F
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 (03) : 311 - 320
  • [9] Hod M, 2015, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V131, pS173, DOI [10.1016/S0020-7292(15)30007-2, 10.1016/S0020-7292(15)30033-3]
  • [10] International Diabetes Federation, 2019, IDF Diabetes Atlas, V9th ed