Catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with an irrigated contact-force sensing radiofrequency ablation catheter

被引:6
作者
Panday, Priya [1 ]
Holmes, Douglas [1 ]
Park, David S. [1 ]
Jankelson, Lior [1 ]
Bernstein, Scott A. [1 ]
Knotts, Robert [1 ]
Kushnir, Alexander [1 ]
Aizer, Anthony [1 ]
Chinitz, Larry A. [1 ]
Barbhaiya, Chirag R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] New York Univ, Langone Hlth New York, Leon H Charney Div Cardiol, Grossman Sch Med, New York, NY USA
[2] New York Univ, Leon H Charney Div Cardiol, Grossman Sch Med, 550 1st Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; irrigated catheter; radiofrequency ablation; slow pathway modification;
D O I
10.1111/jce.15849
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) slow pathway modification for catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is traditionally performed using a 4-mm nonirrigated (NI) RF ablation catheter. Slow pathway modification using irrigated, contact-force sensing (ICFS) RFA catheters has been described in case reports, but the outcomes have not been systematically evaluated. MethodsAcute procedural outcomes of 200 consecutive patients undergoing slow pathway modification for AVNRT were analyzed. A 3.5-mm ICFS RFA catheter (ThermoCool SmartTouch STSF, Biosense Webster, Inc.) was utilized in 134 patients, and a 4-mm NI RFA catheter (EZ Steer, Biosense Webster, Inc.) was utilized in 66 patients. Electroanatomic maps were retrospectively analyzed in a blinded fashion to determine the proximity of ablation lesions to the His region. ResultsThe baseline characteristics of patients in both groups were similar. Total RF time was significantly lower in the ICFS group compared to the NI group (5.53 +/- 4.6 vs. 6.24 +/- 4.9 min, p = 0.03). Median procedure time was similar in both groups (ICFS, 108.0 (87.5-131.5) min vs. NI, 100.0 (85.0-125.0) min; p = 0.2). Ablation was required in closer proximity to the His region in the NI group compared to the ICFS group (14.4 +/- 5.9 vs. 16.7 +/- 6.4 mm, respectively, p = 0.01). AVNRT was rendered noninducible in all patients, and there was no arrhythmia recurrence during follow-up in both groups. Catheter ablation was complicated by AV block in one patient in the NI group. ConclusionSlow pathway modification for catheter ablation of AVNRT using an ICFS RFA catheter is feasible, safe, and may facilitate shorter duration ablation while avoiding ablation in close proximity to the His region.
引用
收藏
页码:942 / 946
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] New Criteria During Right Ventricular Pacing to Determine the Mechanism of Supraventricular Tachycardia
    AlMahameed, Soufian T.
    Buxton, Alfred E.
    Michaud, Gregory F.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 3 (06) : 578 - 584
  • [2] Entrainment for Distinguishing Atypical Atrioventricular Node Reentrant Tachycardia From Atrioventricular Reentrant Tachycardia Over Septal Accessory Pathways With Long Right Ventricular Tachycardia
    Bennett, Matthew T.
    Leong-Sit, Peter
    Gula, Lorne J.
    Skanes, Allan C.
    Yee, Raymond
    Krahn, Andrew D.
    Hogg, Elaina C.
    Klein, George J.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 4 (04) : 506 - 509
  • [3] Efficacy and safety of catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia by means of flexible-tip irrigated catheters
    Bertini, Matteo
    Brieda, Alessandro
    Balla, Cristina
    Pollastrelli, Annalisa
    Smarrazzo, Vittorio
    Francesco, Vitali
    Malagu, Michele
    Ferrari, Roberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (01) : 61 - 67
  • [4] Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease using cooled radiofrequency energy - Results of a prospective multicenter study
    Calkins, H
    Epstein, A
    Packer, D
    Arria, AM
    Hummel, J
    Gilligan, DM
    Trusso, J
    Carlson, M
    Luceri, R
    Kopelman, H
    Wilber, D
    Wharton, JM
    Stevenson, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (07) : 1905 - 1914
  • [5] Current management and clinical outcomes for catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia
    Chrispin, Jonathan
    Misra, Satish
    Marine, Joseph E.
    Rickard, John
    Barth, Andreas
    Kolandaivelu, Aravindan
    Ashikaga, Hiroshi
    Tandri, Harikrishna
    Spragg, David D.
    Crosson, Jane
    Berger, Ronald D.
    Tomaselli, Gordon
    Calkins, Hugh
    Sinha, Sunil K.
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2018, 20 (04): : E51 - E59
  • [6] Contino Chase J, 2020, J Innov Card Rhythm Manag, V11, P4297, DOI 10.19102/icrm.2020.111103
  • [7] BASIC ASPECTS OF RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION
    NATH, S
    DIMARCO, JP
    HAINES, DE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 5 (10) : 863 - 876
  • [8] Soejima K, 2001, CIRCULATION, V103, P1858
  • [9] RF catheter ablation: Lessons on lesions
    Wittkampf, Fred H. M.
    Nakagawa, Hirosh
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 29 (11): : 1285 - 1297