The WHO Foundation in global health governance: Depoliticizing corporate philanthropy

被引:3
作者
Ralston, Rob [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Wagner-Rizvi, Tracey [1 ,3 ]
van Schalkwyk, May CI. [2 ]
Maani, Nason [1 ]
Collin, Jeff [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Social & Polit Sci, Global Hlth Policy Unit, Social Policy, Edinburgh, Scotland
[2] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Fac Publ Hlth & Policy, London, England
[3] SPECTRUM Consortium, London, England
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Social & Polit Sci, Social Policy, Chrystal Macmillan Bldg Room 2-27,15a George Sq, Edinburgh EH8 9LD, Scotland
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
Philanthropy; WHO Foundation; Global health governance; Depoliticisation; World Health Organization; Commercial determinants of health; Political determinants of health;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116515
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The creation of the WHO Foundation during the COVID-19 pandemic represents a significant institutional development in the politics of financing the World Health Organization (WHO). In the context of longstanding acute financial pressures, the objective of the WHO Foundation is to widen WHO's resource base by attracting philanthropic donations from the commercial sector. In placing funding decisions 'at one remove' from WHO, the stated expectation is that the WHO Foundation will act as an intermediary, insulating the WHO from potential conflicts of interest and reputational risk through a combination of strategic distance from WHO and proximity with its norms and rules of engagement with non-state actors. Yet, whether this model has translated into practice remains understudied. In this article, we focus on emerging institutional practices within the WHO Foundation, highlighting a drift from its stated governance model. Based on analysis of WHO Foundation documents, we demonstrate how due diligence and transparency practices within the Foundation have been redesigned in ways that contradict or subvert its claims to applying alignment with WHO's governance norms, notably relating to its engagement with health harming industries such as alcohol and petrochemical companies. While this situation may seem paradoxical, we argue that, in placing funding decisions 'at one remove' from the formal institutions and structures of WHO, the creation of the Foundation has served to displace this issue to a more secluded arena where drifts in practice are less exposed to political oversight and scrutiny. Focusing on the discursive aspects of this process of depoliticisation, we contend that the Foundation has strategically managed 'fictional expectations' of accountable and transparent governance in order to mitigate concerns about its mandate and functions. This assessment provides new and important insights into the depoliticizing functions of the WHO Foundation and the significant implications this may have for global health governance.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, Social Medicine
  • [2] The political economy of infant and young child feeding: confronting corporate power, overcoming structural barriers, and accelerating progress
    Baker, Phillip
    Smith, Julie P.
    Garde, Amandine
    Grummer-Strawn, Laurence M.
    Wood, Benjamin
    Sen, Gita
    Hastings, Gerard
    Perez-Escamilla, Rafael
    Ling, Chee Yoke
    Rollins, Nigel
    McCoy, David
    [J]. LANCET, 2023, 401 (10375) : 503 - 524
  • [3] Globalization, first-foods systems transformations and corporate power: a synthesis of literature and data on the market and political practices of the transnational baby food industry
    Baker, Phillip
    Russ, Katheryn
    Kang, Manho
    Santos, Thiago M.
    Neves, Paulo A. R.
    Smith, Julie
    Kingston, Gillian
    Mialon, Melissa
    Lawrence, Mark
    Wood, Benjamin
    Moodie, Rob
    Clark, David
    Sievert, Katherine
    Boatwright, Monique
    McCoy, David
    [J]. GLOBALIZATION AND HEALTH, 2021, 17 (01)
  • [4] (De)politicisation and the Father's Clause parliamentary debates
    Bates, Stephen
    Jenkins, Laura
    Amery, Fran
    [J]. POLICY AND POLITICS, 2014, 42 (02): : 243 - 258
  • [5] Imagined futures: fictional expectations in the economy
    Beckert, Jens
    [J]. THEORY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 42 (03) : 219 - 240
  • [6] Between Participation and Capture in International Rule-Making: The WHO Framework of Engagement with Non-State Actors
    Berman, Ayelet
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2021, 32 (01) : 227 - 254
  • [7] Beveridge R, 2014, POLICY POLIT, V42, P275, DOI 10.1332/030557312X655918
  • [8] Consultants, depoliticization and arena-shifting in the policy process: privatizing water in Berlin
    Beveridge, Ross
    [J]. POLICY SCIENCES, 2012, 45 (01) : 47 - 68
  • [9] Understanding institutional dynamics in participatory governance: how rules, practices and narratives combine to produce stability or diverge to create conditions for change
    Blanco, Ismael
    Lowndes, Vivien
    Salazar, Yunailis
    [J]. CRITICAL POLICY STUDIES, 2022, 16 (02) : 204 - 223
  • [10] Blyth Mark., 2011, Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199736430.003.0005, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199736430.003.0005]