Evaluation of an AI Model to Assess Future Breast Cancer Risk

被引:27
作者
Damiani, Celeste [1 ,2 ]
Kalliatakis, Grigorios [3 ]
Sreenivas, Muthyala [4 ]
Al-Attar, Miaad [5 ]
Rose, Janice [6 ]
Pudney, Clare [6 ]
Lane, Emily F. [2 ]
Cuzick, Jack [2 ]
Montana, Giovanni [7 ]
Brentnall, Adam R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ist Italiano Tecnol, Ctr Human Technol, Via Melen 83, I-16152 Genoa, Italy
[2] Queen Mary Univ London, Wolfson Inst Populat Hlth, London, England
[3] Fdn Res & Technol Hellas, Inst Comp Sci ICS, Iraklion, Crete, Greece
[4] Univ Hosp Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust Coven, Joint Director Breast Screening, Coventry, England
[5] Univ Hosp Leicester NHS Trust, Dept Oncoplast Breast Surg, Leicester, England
[6] Natl Inst Canc Res, Breast Grp, London, England
[7] Univ Warwick WMG, Coventry, England
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.222679
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Accurate breast cancer risk assessment after a negative screening result could enable better strategies for early detection. Purpose: To evaluate a deep learning algorithm for risk assessment based on digital mammograms. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational matched case-control study was designed using the OPTIMAM Mammography Image Database from the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme in the United Kingdom from February 2010 to September 2019. Patients with breast cancer (cases) were diagnosed following a mammographic screening or between two triannual screening rounds. Controls were matched based on mammography device, screening site, and age. The artificial intelligence (AI) model only used mammograms at screening before diagnosis. The primary objective was to assess model performance, with a secondary objective to assess heterogeneity and calibration slope. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was estimated for 3-year risk. Heterogeneity according to cancer subtype was assessed using a likelihood ratio interaction test. Statistical significance was set at P <.05. Results: Analysis included patients with screen-detected (median age, 60 years [IQR, 55-65 years]; 2044 female, including 1528 with invasive cancer and 503 with ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]) or interval (median age, 59 years [IQR, 53-65 years]; 696 female, including 636 with invasive cancer and 54 with DCIS) breast cancer and 1:1 matched controls, each with a complete set of mammograms at the screening preceding diagnosis. The AI model had an overall AUC of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.70), with no evidence of a significant difference between interval and screen-detected (AUC, 0.69 vs 0.67; P =.085) cancer. The calibration slope was 1.13 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.26). There was similar performance for the detection of invasive cancer versus DCIS (AUC, 0.68 vs 0.66; P =.057). The model had higher performance for advanced cancer risk (AUC, 0.72 >= stage II vs 0.66 <stage II; P =.037). The AUC for detecting breast cancer in mammograms at diagnosis was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.91). Conclusion: The AI model was found to be a strong predictor of breast cancer risk for 3-6 years following a negative mammographic screening. (c) RSNA, 2023
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, R LANG ENV STAT COMP, V2014
[2]   Interval cancers in the NHS breast cancer screening programme in England, Wales and Northern Ireland [J].
Bennett, R. L. ;
Sellars, S. J. ;
Moss, S. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 104 (04) :571-577
[3]   A case-control evaluation of 143 single nucleotide polymorphisms for breast cancer risk stratification with classical factors and mammographic density [J].
Brentnall, Adam R. ;
van Veen, Elke M. ;
Harkness, Elaine F. ;
Rafiq, Sajjad ;
Byers, Helen ;
Astley, Susan M. ;
Sampson, Sarah ;
Howell, Anthony ;
Newman, William G. ;
Cuzick, Jack ;
Evans, Dafydd Gareth R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 146 (08) :2122-2129
[4]   Risk Models for Breast Cancer and Their Validation [J].
Brentnall, Adam R. ;
Cuzick, Jack .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 35 (01) :14-30
[5]   A concordance index for matched case-control studies with applications in cancer risk [J].
Brentnall, Adam R. ;
Cuzick, Jack ;
Field, John ;
Duffy, Stephen W. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (03) :396-405
[6]  
Damiani C, 2022, STAT ANAL PLAN VALID
[7]   A clinical model for identifying the short-term risk of breast cancer [J].
Eriksson, Mikael ;
Czene, Kamila ;
Pawitan, Yudi ;
Leifland, Karin ;
Darabi, Hatef ;
Hall, Per .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 19
[8]  
GOV.UK, 2024, Guidance Breast Screening: Programme Overview
[9]   OPTIMAM Mammography Image Database: A Large-Scale Resource of Mammography Images and Clinical Data [J].
Halling-Brown, Mark D. ;
Warren, Lucy M. ;
Ward, Dominic ;
Lewis, Emma ;
Mackenzie, Alistair ;
Wallis, Matthew G. ;
Wilkinson, Louise S. ;
Given-Wilson, Rosalind M. ;
McAvinchey, Rita ;
Young, Kenneth C. .
RADIOLOGY-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 3 (01)
[10]   Risk-based breast cancer screening strategies in women [J].
Harkness, Elaine F. ;
Astley, Susan M. ;
Evans, D. Gareth .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 65 :3-17