Robust construction of differential emission measure profiles using a regularized maximum likelihood method

被引:5
作者
Massa, Paolo [1 ]
Emslie, A. Gordon [1 ]
Hannah, Iain G. [2 ]
Kontar, Eduard P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Western Kentucky Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, 1906 Coll Hts Blvd, Bowling Green, KY 42101 USA
[2] Univ Glasgow, SUPA Sch Phys & Astron, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland
关键词
Sun: corona; Sun: UV radiation; methods: numerical; CORONAL DIAGNOSTIC SPECTROMETER; ACTIVE-REGION LOOPS; PLASMA TEMPERATURE; EXPECTATION MAXIMIZATION; FUNDAMENTAL LIMITATIONS; IMAGING SPECTROMETER; MEASURE INVERSION; ITERATIVE METHOD; MASS EJECTION; LINE SPECTRA;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361/202345883
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Context. Extreme-ultraviolet (EUV) observations provide considerable insight into evolving physical conditions in the active solar atmosphere. For a prescribed density and temperature structure, it is straightforward to construct the corresponding differential emission measure profile ?(t), such that ?(t) dT is proportional to the emissivity from plasma in the temperature range [T, T + dT]. Here we study the inverse problem of obtaining a valid ?(T) profile from a set of EUV spectral line intensities observed at a pixel within a solar image.Aims. Our goal is to introduce and develop a regularized maximum likelihood (RML) algorithm designed to address the mathematically ill-posed problem of constructing differential emission measure profiles from a discrete set of EUV intensities in specified wavelength bands, specifically those observed by the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) on the NASA Solar Dynamics Observatory.Methods. The RML method combines features of maximum likelihood and regularized approaches used by other authors. It is also guaranteed to produce a positive definite differential emission measure profile.Results. We evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the method against other published algorithms, using both simulated data generated from parametric differential emission profile forms, and AIA data from a solar eruptive event on 2010 November 3. Similarities and differences between the differential emission measure profiles and maps reconstructed by the various algorithms are discussed.Conclusions. The RML inversion method is mathematically rigorous, computationally efficient, and produces acceptable measures of performance in the following three key areas: fidelity to the data, accuracy in the reconstruction, and robustness in the presence of data noise. As such, it shows considerable promise for computing differential emission measure profiles from datasets of discrete spectral lines.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 63 条
[21]   An iterative method in a probabilistic approach to the spectral inverse problem Differential emission measure from line spectra and broadband data [J].
Goryaev, F. F. ;
Parenti, S. ;
Urnov, A. M. ;
Oparin, S. N. ;
Hochedez, J. -F. ;
Reale, F. .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2010, 523
[22]  
GREEN PJ, 1990, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V52, P443
[23]   Multi-thermal dynamics and energetics of a coronal mass ejection in the low solar atmosphere [J].
Hannah, I. G. ;
Kontar, E. P. .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2013, 553
[24]   Differential emission measures from the regularized inversion of Hinode and SDO data [J].
Hannah, I. G. ;
Kontar, E. P. .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2012, 539
[25]   The coronal diagnostic spectrometer for the solar and heliospheric observatory [J].
Harrison, RA ;
Sawyer, EC ;
Carter, MK ;
Cruise, AM ;
Cutler, RM ;
Fludra, A ;
Hayes, RW ;
Kent, BJ ;
Lang, J ;
Parker, DJ ;
Payne, J ;
Pike, CD ;
Peskett, SC ;
Richards, AG ;
Culhane, JL ;
Norman, K ;
Breeveld, AA ;
Breeveld, ER ;
ALJanabi, KF ;
Mccalden, AJ ;
Parkinson, JH ;
Self, DG ;
Thomas, PD ;
Poland, AI ;
Thomas, RJ ;
Thompson, WT ;
KjeldsethMoe, O ;
Brekke, P ;
Karud, J ;
Maltby, P ;
Aschenbach, B ;
Brauninger, H ;
Kuhne, M ;
Hollandt, J ;
Siegmund, OHW ;
Huber, MCE ;
Gabriel, AH ;
Mason, HE ;
Bromage, BJI .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 1995, 162 (1-2) :233-290
[26]   THE CHROMOSPHERES AND CORONAE OF 5 G-K MAIN-SEQUENCE STARS [J].
JORDAN, C ;
AYRES, TR ;
BROWN, A ;
LINSKY, JL ;
SIMON, T .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1987, 225 (04) :903-937
[27]   Fundamental limitations of emission-line spectra as diagnostics of plasma temperature and density structure [J].
Judge, PG ;
Hubeny, V ;
Brown, JC .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 475 (01) :275-&
[28]   Markov-chain Monte Carlo reconstruction of emission measure distributions: Application to solar extreme-ultraviolet spectra [J].
Kashyap, V ;
Drake, JJ .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 503 (01) :450-466
[29]  
Kuhn H. W., 2014, Traces and Emergence of Nonlinear Programming, P393, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-0348-0439-4_18, 10.1007/978-3-0348-0439-4_18]
[30]  
Kuhn H.W., 2014, Traces and emergence of nonlinear programming, P247, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-0348-0439-411