Evaluation of Student Engagement, Communication, and Collaboration during Online Group Work: Experiences of Fourth Year Veterinary Medicine Students

被引:3
作者
Jahns, Hanne [1 ]
Zintl, Annetta [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Vet Sci Ctr, UCD Sch Vet Med, Vet Pathobiol Sect,Vet Pathol, Belfield 4, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Vet Sci Ctr, UCD Sch Vet Med, Vet Pathobiol Sect, Dublin 4, Ireland
关键词
collaborative learning; case-based learning; peer assessment; communication; online group work; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.3138/jvme-2022-0041
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, online teaching has become widely established in higher education in recent years. However, little is known about the influence of the online environment on collaborative student activities which are an integral part of veterinary education. This study explored engagement, collaboration, and communication among fourth-year veterinary students working in groups on online case-based learning (CBL) activities. Data were collected by questionnaire (93/135) and anonymous peer assessment (98/135) at the end of the trimester. While most students (67%) enjoyed group work and 75% considered it of benefit to their learning, the results indicated that the students' interaction was mainly limited to task management and collating individual answers on shared documents. Rather than meeting online, students communicated by chat and messenger apps. Agreement of roles, rules, and the group contract were largely treated as box-ticking exercises. The conflict was the only factor that affected group work satisfaction and was largely avoided rather than addressed. Interestingly lack of student engagement in group work was not related to overall academic performance and had no impact on their end-of-term exam results. This study highlights high student satisfaction and engagement with online group CBL activities even when collaboration and communication was limited. Achieving higher levels of collaborative learning involving co-regulation of learning and metacognitive processing of learning content may require more specific, formal training in relevant skill sets from an early stage of the veterinary curriculum.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 140
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Anonymous, 2020, UCD TEACHING LEARNIN
[2]  
Anonymous, 2016, ENTRANCE FUTURE ED E
[3]   When smart groups fail [J].
Barron, B .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2003, 12 (03) :307-359
[4]  
Burdett J., 2003, International Education Journal, V4, P177
[5]  
Burdett J, 2009, J UNIV TEACH LEARN P, V6
[6]   When Group Work Doesn't Work: Insights from Students [J].
Chang, Yunjeong ;
Brickman, Peggy .
CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2018, 17 (03)
[7]   What makes a 'good group'? Exploring the characteristics and performance of undergraduate student groups [J].
Channon, S. B. ;
Davis, R. C. ;
Goode, N. T. ;
May, S. A. .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2017, 22 (01) :17-41
[8]   Evaluation of student attitudes to cooperative learning in undergraduate veterinary medicine [J].
Dale, VHM ;
Nasir, L ;
Sullivan, M .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2005, 32 (04) :511-516
[9]   Blended learning in health education: three case studies [J].
de Jong, Nynke ;
Savin-Baden, Maggi ;
Cunningham, Anne Marie ;
Verstegen, Danielle M. L. .
PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2014, 3 (04) :278-288
[10]   Optimizing collaborative learning in online courses [J].
de Nooijer, Jascha ;
Schneider, Francine ;
Verstegen, Danielle M. L. .
CLINICAL TEACHER, 2021, 18 (01) :19-23