Green initiative in a two-echelon Supply chain with co-ordination and contract

被引:0
作者
Ghosh, Santanu Kumar [1 ]
Goswami, Palash [2 ]
机构
[1] Kazi Nazrul Univ, Dept Math, Asansol 713340, W Bengal, India
[2] Michael Madhusudan Mem Coll, Dept Math, Durgapur 713216, W Bengal, India
关键词
Supply chain; co-ordination; environmental sustainability; green marketing; DESIGN; CONFIGURATION; ENVIRONMENT; FRAMEWORK; POLICIES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1051/ro/2024025
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In recent times, environmental responsibility is an important factor that determines the success of a Supply Chain. In this study, we have considered green production in the light of various co-ordinations and contracts. This is a two-echelon Supply chain consisting of one manufacturer who designs and develops a green product and the retailer sells it to the environmentally aware customers and the awareness is converted to actual purchasing behaviour by the retailers marketing strategy and the manufacturer's product design and development which includes technology usage to develop the greenness,packaging and several other factors which were not studied earlier. All these factors are involved in our demand function which is distinct from the existing literature. The model is developed under three contracts, Price-only, green marketing cost sharing and two-part tariff contracts. This is an well-established fact that co-ordination enhances the economic benefits to every tier member of a chain. Our findings also establish that co-ordination and co-operation among members will enhance their environmental sustainability. In this way they can carry out their social responsibilities towards our environment. It is also noticed that as the environmental consciousness of the consumers increases, the cost sharing contract is more profitable for manufacturer than that for retailer whereas the price only contract is profitable for the retailer.
引用
收藏
页码:1147 / 1161
页数:15
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Atasu A, 2009, PROD OPER MANAG, V18, P243, DOI [10.3401/poms.1080.01004, 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01004.x]
  • [2] Cachon GP, 2003, HDBK OPER R, V11, P229, DOI 10.1016/s0927-0507(03)11006-7
  • [3] A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory
    Carter, Craig R.
    Rogers, Dale S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2008, 38 (5-6) : 360 - 387
  • [4] Design for the environment: A quality-based model for green product development
    Chen, CL
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (02) : 250 - 263
  • [5] Cherian J., 2012, Asian Social Science, V8, P117, DOI [10.5539/ass.v8n12p117, DOI 10.5539/ASS.V8N12P117]
  • [6] COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review
    Chowdhury, Priyabrata
    Paul, Sanjoy Kumar
    Kaisar, Shahriar
    Moktadir, Md. Abdul
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2021, 148
  • [7] Elkin T., 2001, Advert. Age, P4
  • [8] A tradeoff model for green supply chain planning: A leanness-versus-greenness analysis
    Fahimnia, Behnam
    Sarkis, Joseph
    Eshragh, Ali
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 54 : 173 - 190
  • [9] Closed-loop supply chain configuration for new and reconditioned products: An integrated optimization model
    Gaur, Jighyasu
    Amini, Mehdi
    Rao, A. K.
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2017, 66 : 212 - 223
  • [10] Design for the environment: Impact of regulatory policies on product development
    Gouda, Sirish Kumar
    Jonnalagedda, Sreelata
    Saranga, Haritha
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 248 (02) : 558 - 570