The potential of microbiota information to better predict efficiency traits in growing pigs fed a conventional and a high-fiber diet

被引:1
作者
Deru, Vanille [1 ,2 ]
Tiezzi, Francesco [3 ]
Carillier-Jacquin, Celine [1 ]
Blanchet, Benoit [4 ]
Cauquil, Laurent [1 ]
Zemb, Olivier [1 ]
Bouquet, Alban [5 ]
Maltecca, Christian [6 ]
Gilbert, Helene [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse, GenPhySE, INRAE, ENVT, Castanet Tolosan, France
[2] France Genet Porc, F-35651 Le Rheu, France
[3] Univ Florence, Dept Agr Food Environm & Forestry, I-50144 Florence, Italy
[4] Domaine Prise, INRAE, UE3P, F-35590 Saint Gilles, France
[5] IFIP Inst Porc, F-35651 Le Rheu, France
[6] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Raleigh, NC USA
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
FECAL MICROBIOTA; FEED-EFFICIENCY; GENOME; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1186/s12711-023-00865-4
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Background Improving pigs' ability to digest diets with an increased dietary fiber content is a lever to improve feed efficiency and limit feed costs in pig production. The aim of this study was to determine whether information on the gut microbiota and host genetics can contribute to predict digestive efficiency (DE, i.e. digestibility coefficients of energy, organic matter, and nitrogen), feed efficiency (FE, i.e. feed conversion ratio and residual feed intake), average daily gain, and daily feed intake phenotypes. Data were available for 1082 pigs fed a conventional or high-fiber diet. Fecal samples were collected at 16 weeks, and DE was estimated using near-infrared spectrometry. A cross-validation approach was used to predict traits within the same diet, for the opposite diet, and for a combination of both diets, by implementing three models, i.e. with only genomic (Gen), only microbiota (Micro), and both genomic and microbiota information (Micro+Gen). The predictive ability with and without sharing common sires and breeding environment was also evaluated. Prediction accuracy of the phenotypes was calculated as the correlation between model prediction and phenotype adjusted for fixed effects.Results Prediction accuracies of the three models were low to moderate (< 0.47) for growth and FE traits and not significantly different between models. In contrast, for DE traits, prediction accuracies of model Gen were low (< 0.30) and those of models Micro and Micro+Gen were moderate to high (> 0.52). Prediction accuracies were not affected by the stratification of diets in the reference and validation sets and were in the same order of magnitude within the same diet, for the opposite diet, and for the combination of both diets. Prediction accuracies of the three models were significantly higher when pigs in the reference and validation populations shared common sires and breeding environment than when they did not (P < 0.001).Conclusions The microbiota is a relevant source of information to predict DE regardless of the diet, but not to predict growth and FE traits for which prediction accuracies were similar to those obtained with genomic information only. Further analyses on larger datasets and more diverse diets should be carried out to complement and consolidate these results.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [21] Host contributes to longitudinal diversity of fecal microbiota in swine selected for lean growth
    Lu, Duc
    Tiezzi, Francesco
    Schillebeeckx, Constantino
    McNulty, Nathan P.
    Schwab, Clint
    Shull, Caleb
    Maltecca, Christian
    [J]. MICROBIOME, 2018, 6
  • [22] Predicting Growth and Carcass Traits in Swine Using Microbiome Data and Machine Learning Algorithms
    Maltecca, Christian
    Duc Lu
    Schillebeeckx, Constantino
    McNulty, Nathan P.
    Schwab, Clint
    Shull, Caleb
    Tiezzi, Francesco
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [23] phyloseq: An R Package for Reproducible Interactive Analysis and Graphics of Microbiome Census Data
    McMurdie, Paul J.
    Holmes, Susan
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (04):
  • [24] Environmentally-acquired bacteria influence microbial diversity and natural innate immune responses at gut surfaces
    Mulder, Imke E.
    Schmidt, Bettina
    Stokes, Christopher R.
    Lewis, Marie
    Bailey, Mick
    Aminov, Rustam I.
    Prosser, James I.
    Gill, Bhupinder P.
    Pluske, John R.
    Mayer, Claus-Dieter
    Musk, Corran C.
    Kelly, Denise
    [J]. BMC BIOLOGY, 2009, 7
  • [25] A review of feed efficiency in swine: biology and application
    Patience, John F.
    Rossoni-Serao, Mariana C.
    Gutierrez, Nestor A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 6
  • [26] Genome-Wide Regression and Prediction with the BGLR Statistical Package
    Perez, Paulino
    de los Campos, Gustavo
    [J]. GENETICS, 2014, 198 (02) : 483 - U63
  • [27] Opportunities and limits of combining microbiome and genome data for complex trait prediction
    Perez-Enciso, Miguel
    Zingaretti, Laura M.
    Ramayo-Caldas, Yuliaxis
    de Los Campos, Gustavo
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2021, 53 (01)
  • [28] PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses
    Purcell, Shaun
    Neale, Benjamin
    Todd-Brown, Kathe
    Thomas, Lori
    Ferreira, Manuel A. R.
    Bender, David
    Maller, Julian
    Sklar, Pamela
    de Bakker, Paul I. W.
    Daly, Mark J.
    Sham, Pak C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2007, 81 (03) : 559 - 575
  • [29] A global comparison of the microbiome compositions of three gut locations in commercial pigs with extreme feed conversion ratios
    Quan, Jianping
    Cai, Gengyuan
    Ye, Jian
    Yang, Ming
    Ding, Rongrong
    Wang, Xingwang
    Zheng, Enqin
    Fu, Disheng
    Li, Shaoyun
    Zhou, Shenping
    Liu, Dewu
    Yang, Jie
    Wu, Zhenfang
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [30] The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools
    Quast, Christian
    Pruesse, Elmar
    Yilmaz, Pelin
    Gerken, Jan
    Schweer, Timmy
    Yarza, Pablo
    Peplies, Joerg
    Gloeckner, Frank Oliver
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2013, 41 (D1) : D590 - D596