Does implementation of a environmental protection tax reduce energy consumption: evidence from China

被引:1
作者
Li, Xing [1 ]
Xu, Shulin [1 ]
Xiong, Yunjun [2 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Cultural Tourism & Geog, Guangzhou 510320, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Econ & Adm, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental protection tax; Green energy consumption; Green finance; Technology innovation; Industrial structure upgrading; Tax collection intensity; EFFICIENCY; SYSTEMS; TRADE;
D O I
10.1007/s10479-023-05805-5
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Environmental friendliness and energy conservation are good guarantees and driving forces for the sustainable development. How to coordinate the relationship between the two is crucial for building a "resource saving" and "environmentally friendly" society. This article uses the data from Chinese cities from 2010 to 2021 to explore whether environmental protection tax (EPT) could reduce energy consumption. Baseline regression found that EPT significantly reduced China's energy consumption and achieved a "resource saving" society. The EPT shows obvious heterogeneity characteristics, significantly reducing energy consumption in the central and western regions and the two-controlled areas, while the policy effect on the eastern region and non two-controlled areas is not significant. In addition, EPT has effectively reduced China's energy consumption by enhancing investment in urban research and development innovation, optimizing industrial structure, and strengthening tax collection intensity. The conclusion is helpful in achieving the construction of an "environmentally friendly" society.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Unveiling the heterogeneous impacts of environmental taxes on energy consumption and energy intensity: Empirical evidence from OECD countries [J].
Bashir, Muhammad Farhan ;
Ma, Benjiang ;
Shahbaz, Muhammad ;
Shahzad, Umer ;
Vo, Xuan Vinh .
ENERGY, 2021, 226 (226)
[3]   How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Duflo, E ;
Mullainathan, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) :249-275
[4]   The Contours of "Cap and Trade": The Evolution of Emissions Trading Systems for Greenhouse Gases [J].
Betsill, Michele ;
Hoffmann, Matthew J. .
REVIEW OF POLICY RESEARCH, 2011, 28 (01) :83-106
[5]   Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China's thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model [J].
Bi, Gong-Bing ;
Song, Wen ;
Zhou, P. ;
Liang, Liang .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 66 :537-546
[6]   Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods [J].
Callaway, Brantly ;
Sant'Anna, Pedro H. C. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2021, 225 (02) :200-230
[7]   Industrial activity and the environment in China: An industry-level analysis [J].
Cole, Matthew A. ;
Elliott, Robert J. R. ;
Wu, Shanshan .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 19 (03) :393-408
[8]   The determinants of citizen complaints on environmental pollution: an empirical study from China [J].
Dong, Yanli ;
Ishikawa, Masanobu ;
Liu, Xianbing ;
Hamori, Shigeyuki .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011, 19 (12) :1306-1314
[9]   Why are firms that export cleaner? International trade, abatement and environmental emissions [J].
Forslid, Rikard ;
Okubo, Toshihiro ;
Ulltveit-Moe, Karen Helene .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 91 :166-183
[10]   Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on energy efficiency in the industrial sector: Evidence from Chinese provincial data [J].
Guo, Ran ;
Yuan, Yijun .
ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 145