Is the Robotic Assisted Hybrid Approach Increasing the MIS efficiency for Pancreaticoduodenectomy?

被引:0
作者
Copaescu, Catalin [1 ,2 ]
Dumbrava, Bogdan [1 ]
机构
[1] Ponderas Acad Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Bucharest, Romania
[2] Ponderas Acad Hosp, Surg, Nicolae Caramfil St 85 A,Dist 1, Bucharest, Romania
关键词
pancreaticoduodenectomy; minimal-invasive; robotic-assisted; hybrid; laparoscopy; LAPAROSCOPIC PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PANCREATECTOMY; METAANALYSIS; EXPERIENCE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.21614/chirurgia.2023.v.118.i.3.p.302
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Pancreaticoduodenectomy, commonly known as the Whipple procedure, is a complex surgical technique employed for the treatment of various pancreatic and periampullary pathologies. Minimally invasive PD was created in an attempt to enhance the outcomes of the traditional, open technique. However, the reconstruction phase has been recognized as a substantial barrier to widespread adoption of the laparoscopic technique. Several research appraisals and case studies recommend the robotic technique as a facilitator during the reconstruction steps. We propose a hybrid approach to combine the versatility of laparoscopy and the visual and motor advantages of the DaVinci Xi in order to maximize the precision of the reconstruction. Our suggestion is based on the experience that our institution has had with the standardization of different surgical procedures and protocols.Methods: This article is focused on the outcomes of robotic assisted PD in our institution. Eleven patients underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic PD between 1st January, 2020 and 7th March, 2023 (N=11). There were two approaches involved: hybrid PD type A (N=6) and hybrid PD type B (N=5). Of the eleven patients who underwent hybrid PD, most of them were men (81.8%) and mean age was 61.9 years-old (range 45 to 75 years). The mean operative duration was 618 minutes (range 480 to 780 minutes). Mean blood loss was 159 mL (range 50 to 350 mL). Ten operations were performed for malignancy and one for neuroendocrine duodenal tumour; the mean number of lymph nodes retrieved was 16.2 (range 11 to 24 nodes) and all the specimens were reported by pathology as R0. Mean hospital stay was 18 days (range 8 to 40 days). Reoperations were necessary in five patients (N=5), all from the type A group, and mortality occurred in one (N=1) patient. There were no conversions to open surgery during the index procedures as well as no clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulae. Thirty-day mortality was nil, with 1 mortality at 90-days due to massive pulmonary embolism.Conclusions: The hybrid approach facilitates the advantages of both laparoscopic and robotic approaches. While laparoscopy is safer in manipulating the bowel and allows the Roux en Y reconstruction and gastro-pancreatic anastomosis, the robotic assistance enables the surgeon to perform delicate anastomosis with a high accuracy. The learning curve's most important element is standardization and careful patient selection along with a stepwise approach.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 313
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [11] Improvement of surgical results for pancreatic cancer
    Hartwig, Werner
    Werner, Jens
    Jaeger, Dirk
    Debus, Juergen
    Buechler, Markus W.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (11) : E476 - E485
  • [12] Pancreatic Anastomotic Failure Rate after Pancreaticoduodenectomy Decreases with Microsurgery
    Hashimoto, Yasushi
    Traverso, L. William
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2010, 211 (04) : 510 - 521
  • [13] Robotic surgery of the pancreas
    Joyce, Daniel
    Morris-Stiff, Gareth
    Falk, Gavin A.
    El-Hayek, Kevin
    Chalikonda, Sricharan
    Walsh, R. Matthew
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (40) : 14726 - 14732
  • [14] Early experience of laparoscopic and robotic hybrid pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Kim, Hongbeom
    Kim, Jae Ri
    Han, Youngmin
    Kwon, Wooil
    Kim, Sun-Whe
    Jang, Jin-Young
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2017, 13 (03)
  • [15] Total robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review of the literature
    Kornaropoulos, Michail
    Moris, Demetrios
    Beal, Eliza W.
    Makris, Marinos C.
    Mitrousias, Apostolos
    Petrou, Athanasios
    Felekouras, Evangelos
    Michalinos, Adamantios
    Vailas, Michail
    Schizas, Dimitrios
    Papalampros, Alexandros
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (11): : 4382 - 4392
  • [16] Kvasivka O, 2022, European Journal of Surgical Oncology, V48, pe128
  • [17] Robotic and laparoscopic surgery of the pancreas: an historical review
    Alan Kawarai Lefor
    [J]. BMC Biomedical Engineering, 1 (1):
  • [18] Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Robotic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Low-Risk Surgical Candidates A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study
    Liu, Qu
    Zhao, Zhiming
    Zhang, Xiuping
    Wang, Wei
    Han, Bing
    Chen, Xiong
    Tan, Xiaodong
    Xu, Shuai
    Zhao, Guodong
    Gao, Yuanxing
    Gan, Qin
    Yuan, Jianlei
    Ma, Yuntao
    Dong, Ye
    Liu, Zhonghua
    Wang, Hailong
    Fan, Fangyong
    Liu, Jianing
    Lau, Wan Yee
    Liu, Rong
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2023, 277 (04) : e864 - e871
  • [19] International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery
    Liu, Rong
    Wakabayashi, Go
    Palanivelu, Chinnusamy
    Tsung, Allan
    Yang, Kehu
    Goh, Brian K. P.
    Chong, Charing Ching-Ning
    Kang, Chang Moo
    Peng, Chenghong
    Kakiashvili, Eli
    Han, Ho-Seong
    Kim, Hong-Jin
    He, Jin
    Lee, Jae Hoon
    Takaori, Kyoichi
    Marino, Marco Vito
    Wang, Shen-Nien
    Guo, Tiankang
    Hackert, Thilo
    Huang, Ting-Shuo
    Anusak, Yiengpruksawan
    Fong, Yuman
    Nagakawa, Yuichi
    Shyr, Yi-Ming
    Wu, Yao-Ming
    Zhao, Yupei
    [J]. HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION, 2019, 8 (04) : 345 - 360
  • [20] First experience with robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in Singapore
    Low, Tze-Yi
    Koh, Ye-Xin
    Goh, Brian K. P.
    [J]. SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 61 (11) : 598 - 604